Honda Fit (Jazz) Tyres
On this page you will find the best real world tyre reviews from owners of the Honda Fit (Jazz).
Do you Drive a Honda Fit (Jazz)? Why not add your own tyre review and help other owners pick the right tyre! After all, who knows what the best tyre for a Fit (Jazz) better than the owners?
| Tyre Reviewed | Dry Grip | Wet Grip | Feedback | Handling | Wear | Comfort |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continental WinterContact TS 800 (12) | 88% | 93% | 86% | 88% | 88% | 89% |
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport (17) | 91% | 86% | 84% | 91% | 76% | 80% |
| Michelin X Ice Snow (16) | 78% | 79% | 75% | 74% | 90% | 88% |
| Nokian WR (8) | 76% | 91% | 79% | 76% | 88% | 79% |
| Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 (21) | 88% | 78% | 86% | 89% | 74% | 76% |
| Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 (43) | 88% | 80% | 80% | 80% | 78% | 86% |
| Yokohama C Drive (45) | 86% | 82% | 83% | 77% | 77% | 86% |
| Yokohama AVS dB v550 (6) | 88% | 77% | 83% | 82% | 67% | 92% |
| Lassa Greenways (18) | 83% | 79% | 79% | 78% | 85% | 79% |
| Bridgestone Adrenalin RE003 (97) | 90% | 78% | 83% | 86% | 70% | 73% |
| Maxxis MA iPro Victra iPro (25) | 88% | 78% | 83% | 84% | 68% | 77% |
| Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 (55) | 83% | 78% | 80% | 80% | 75% | 86% |
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 (67) | 84% | 79% | 81% | 81% | 77% | 76% |
| Continental UltraContact UC6 (52) | 86% | 82% | 73% | 75% | 76% | 81% |
| Bridgestone Potenza RE71R (14) | 99% | 81% | 84% | 92% | 52% | 41% |
| Avon ZV5 (112) | 84% | 78% | 77% | 77% | 71% | 77% |
| GT Radial CHAMPIRO SX2 (20) | 88% | 63% | 81% | 87% | 69% | 65% |
| Nokian One (19) | 89% | 78% | 79% | 71% | 77% | 78% |
| Jinyu YH12 (28) | 81% | 74% | 79% | 69% | 79% | 80% |
| Michelin Energy Saver (136) | 83% | 71% | 74% | 71% | 85% | 80% |
| Michelin Energy XM2 (54) | 80% | 74% | 73% | 74% | 86% | 72% |
| Toyo Proxes TR1 (70) | 84% | 74% | 77% | 80% | 71% | 67% |
| Bridgestone Potenza RE001 (42) | 87% | 72% | 78% | 80% | 70% | 63% |
| Dunlop SP Sport LM704 (27) | 80% | 58% | 75% | 75% | 79% | 79% |
| Yokohama C Drive2 (31) | 79% | 73% | 70% | 69% | 71% | 81% |
| Achilles Platinum (8) | 88% | 76% | 66% | 71% | 74% | 65% |
| Falken Azenis RT 615 K (2) | 85% | 75% | 65% | 90% | 35% | 70% |
| Sailun Atrezzo Elite (23) | 81% | 74% | 72% | 68% | 66% | 71% |
| Maxxis Premitra HP5 (40) | 83% | 75% | 73% | 74% | 63% | 69% |
| Achilles 123S (13) | 91% | 64% | 81% | 82% | 58% | 57% |
| Federal Formoza AZ01 (4) | 88% | 67% | 80% | 73% | 50% | 65% |
| Bridgestone Turanza Serenity Plus (17) | 78% | 68% | 62% | 69% | 93% | 70% |
| Toyo Proxes Sport (22) | 75% | 62% | 70% | 65% | 69% | 69% |
| Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 (69) | 75% | 68% | 67% | 67% | 65% | 68% |
| GT Radial Champiro ECO (12) | 73% | 60% | 61% | 66% | 64% | 64% |
| Maxxis MA Z4S Victra (18) | 89% | 77% | 79% | 78% | 80% | 78% |
| Kumho Ecsta AST KU25 (8) | 83% | 66% | 68% | 65% | 71% | 49% |
| Kumho Ecsta XT KU37 (11) | 72% | 60% | 63% | 60% | 65% | 68% |
| Bridgestone Sporty Style MY02 (8) | 74% | 58% | 63% | 66% | 66% | 63% |
| Kenda KOMET PLUS KR23 (24) | 73% | 55% | 64% | 60% | 70% | 75% |
| Federal Formoza FD1 (15) | 71% | 56% | 49% | 51% | 57% | 58% |
| Bridgestone Supercat (24) | 60% | 34% | 48% | 51% | 70% | 65% |
| Yokohama ICE GUARD IG50 PLUS (3) | 40% | 43% | 43% | 43% | 60% | 53% |
| Event MJ683 (4) | 50% | 35% | 45% | 45% | 23% | 45% |
Honda Fit (Jazz) Tyre Review Highlights
Writing about the Nokian One given 75% (185-65-15)
Driving on mostly country roads for 20000 average miles
Driving on mostly country roads for 20000 average miles
The tire was better than the OEM Continental tires regarding comfort (noise) and grip in the dry. The grip in wet, snow and ice were comparable. After two years and roughly 20.000 miles the tires have worn down to the 60% mark.
All four tires are now showing the beginning of a tread separation in the shoulder area. According to the tire dealer a typical issue of the NOKIAN One tire.
All four tires are now showing the beginning of a tread separation in the shoulder area. According to the tire dealer a typical issue of the NOKIAN One tire.
Writing about the Michelin X Ice Snow given 87% (175-65-15)
Driving on mostly motorways for 100000 spirited miles
Driving on mostly motorways for 100000 spirited miles
This is my third set of Xice tires
Just bought a new set have had two sets previously
Have driven on many different studded tires from cheapest to premium, went to studless as I was doing a long highway commute and was sick of the noise, and legal limits on when to have the tires on and off.
I drive in the worst of Canadian weather in Newfoundland Canada. Snow slush freezing rain we see it all.
The original Xice was better in deep snow
The newest ones are great winter tires but twitchy at the limit of traction
I only miss studs on wet smooth ice
If you drive on a well serviced road these are great tires
Had blizzacks DMV 2 on our van. There better but wear extremely fast
If you get a lot of smooth ice or wet ice go with the studded version or a Hakka 10 studded
Third set debating between Xice studded or Hakkas for my wife’s Subaru as she makes a trip across Newfoundland Canada at least once a winter 1000 km drive.
Just bought a new set have had two sets previously
Have driven on many different studded tires from cheapest to premium, went to studless as I was doing a long highway commute and was sick of the noise, and legal limits on when to have the tires on and off.
I drive in the worst of Canadian weather in Newfoundland Canada. Snow slush freezing rain we see it all.
The original Xice was better in deep snow
The newest ones are great winter tires but twitchy at the limit of traction
I only miss studs on wet smooth ice
If you drive on a well serviced road these are great tires
Had blizzacks DMV 2 on our van. There better but wear extremely fast
If you get a lot of smooth ice or wet ice go with the studded version or a Hakka 10 studded
Third set debating between Xice studded or Hakkas for my wife’s Subaru as she makes a trip across Newfoundland Canada at least once a winter 1000 km drive.
Writing about the Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport given 88% (195-50-16)
Driving on a combination of roads for 500 average miles
Driving on a combination of roads for 500 average miles
Any judgement exists by virtue of context. In my case, the context is the set of OEM tires that came with my car, the Honda Jazz/Fit, 2018 model in Asia. After 5,5 years of ownership, I went through 2 sets of OEM tires: Bridgestone Turanza ER370 185/55/R16, having driven 47700 kilometers/ 29639 miles. In both cases replacement by necessity; dry rot cracking, due to South East Asian climate conditions. Still plenty of tread left actually. Anyway, the Turanza's were pretty decent, but they felt like wobbly balloons. Okay that's an exaggeration, but I was getting a bit tired of the amount of tire deflection during cornering and the wobbling rake during acceleration. If there was any element holding back this car's potential, it was the tires. So I set out to search for something more sporty - and this turned out to be a tougher challenge than I thought because UHP tires in this small size are hard / impossible to find in the Philippines, even if they do exist in the international market (for example; Continental ExtremeContact Sport). Eventually, I found these Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport tires for about 95 USD per tire, which is actually a rational and proportionally justifiable price for a car like the Honda Jazz on Philippines roads (potholes and all). It has to be said, that despite being wobbly balloons, the Turanza's featured excellent dry and wet grip, plenty within the range of Philippines speed limits (100 KPH) and even beyond that. In that sense, the Eagle F1 Sport had to at least perform equally to the Turanza's in order to not feel disappointed. Although I've only done about 500 kilometers so far (both city driving and expressway) I can safely say the Eagle F1 Sport tires exceed the Turanza ER370's; At the very least they match the dry and wet grip, but more important to me is how they changed the handling. And this brings me to the another aspect of my purchase choice; I went from the Turanza's 185/55/R16 to the Eagle F1 Sport in 195/50R16; This means a diameter decrease of 1.39 percent. This accentuates the stiffer sidewall and it also subtly affects the "gearing ratio" (car comes with a CVT). As intended, cornering feels a lot better now thanks to minimal tire deflection. Acceleration also feels better because the chassis rake doesn't wobble as much anymore front to rear axle. And all of this doesn't deteriorate comfort levels as far as I can tell, even with all the potholes and uneven road surfaces here in the Philippines. UTOG treadwear says 300, whereas the Turanza's said 320; but all of this is meaningless to me now because of the UV intense climate here. In fact, I've just purchased UV protective wheel covers to minimize the impact of heat, dampness and UV rays. For 95 USD per tire, I think the Eagle F1 Sport is the sweet-spot choice for this South East Asian scenario.
Writing about the Federal Formoza AZ01 given 77% (185-55-16-)
Driving on mostly country roads for 20000 spirited miles
Driving on mostly country roads for 20000 spirited miles
Being using these tires for the last 4 years, done about 20000km on them and the grip is amazing, its on a Honda Fit RS GP4 and the tires grip really well on the dry. Didn't get a lot of mileage out of it probably because of the way i drive. but i would recommend these tires for someone who drives spiritedly time to time i have confidence of the grip. being through a lot of pot holes because i am from a South Asian country with bad roads but no issues with the tires.
Writing about the Yokohama ICE GUARD IG50 PLUS given 82% (175-65-15-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 23000 easy going miles
Driving on a combination of roads for 23000 easy going miles
I bought my car with these winter tires. They where new... I did approx. 38k with them and there are still at least 10k. Unfortunately almost no snow experience , here in Ireland, just 3-4 days in 2 years. Compared with other winter tires I used ( Pirelli, Kumho and Brigestone ) these were used 2 years continuously , while other were changed : Winter - winter tires , Summer - with summer tires. The only issue, according to me is - fuel consumption. It increased with approx. 1lt/100km.( compared with summer tires )... Otherwise tires are super ! I use them on AWD - all are worn the same, Tires are soft so the grip is perfect, in all seasons, almost no traction control light seen on the board... Comfort - they are noise compared with summer ones but have smooth drive...maybe due to the soft resin.
Writing about the Toyo Proxes Sport given 60% (185-55-16-)
Driving on mostly country roads for 300 average miles
Driving on mostly country roads for 300 average miles
First off, ignore the optimistic reviews on here. They are obvious and sound like Yanks on crack with their excess positivity. Proxes are fine for the money, but pretty hopeless in some situations such as the wet, or over a cattle grid. Nearly lost control on hitting a cattle grid recently at relatively slow speed. I've had Proxes twice and wasn't all that impressed on either occasion in the wet.
Writing about the Falken Azenis RT 615 K given 70% (195-60-14-)
Driving on mostly country roads for 8000 spirited miles
Driving on mostly country roads for 8000 spirited miles
My review is based on the RT615K+ variant.
Not many options in 14" sizing. Glad i went with the Falkens. Because of the high sidewalls their character will be a bit different from more normal sizing.
Really enjoyed having these on. Will likely get them again. Just a very friendly 200TW tyre. Decent dry grip but outshone by other 200TW. Took a little bit too get heat into on the street but easier than RS4 IMO. Wet grip surprisingly good in light to medium rain. Breakaway always very progressive and easy to manage. Lasted 12,000kms on my car with a lot of very heavy miles, one trackday, and bad alignment chewing out the insides.
Worked okay down to 5C, though harder to get fully warm at those Temps.
A good beginner semi-slick or a sporty daily for someone living in warmer climates. Better than RE003/Trackhawk Indy 500. Worse than RS4
Not many options in 14" sizing. Glad i went with the Falkens. Because of the high sidewalls their character will be a bit different from more normal sizing.
Really enjoyed having these on. Will likely get them again. Just a very friendly 200TW tyre. Decent dry grip but outshone by other 200TW. Took a little bit too get heat into on the street but easier than RS4 IMO. Wet grip surprisingly good in light to medium rain. Breakaway always very progressive and easy to manage. Lasted 12,000kms on my car with a lot of very heavy miles, one trackday, and bad alignment chewing out the insides.
Worked okay down to 5C, though harder to get fully warm at those Temps.
A good beginner semi-slick or a sporty daily for someone living in warmer climates. Better than RE003/Trackhawk Indy 500. Worse than RS4
For me it is best budget friendly tire in the market.
Writing about the GT Radial CHAMPIRO SX2 given 74% (195-50-15-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 10000 average miles
Driving on a combination of roads for 10000 average miles
Suprisingly good on dry traction and wear. Keep it well inflated and ensure camber bolts are in the front keeping at least -1.2° and the tyres will last better than RE003. Wet traction is average and tyre feedback is weak. You don't know when you will lose grip.
Writing about the GT Radial CHAMPIRO SX2 given 67% (195-55-15-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 1200 spirited miles
Driving on a combination of roads for 1200 spirited miles
Been using these for a few months now, mostly for daily driving but i also sometimes did some hard touge driving on the weekends, here are my thoughts :
1. Dry grip : it's about the same level as your typical Michelin Pilot Sport 4 which is a little bit disappointing for a "200TW extreme performance track tyre", i was expecting atleast Pilot 4S kind of grip.
2. Wet grip : decent, no issues with aquaplanning but it does have some slight understeer here and there.
3. Road feedback : good, you could feel even the tiny bumps through the steering wheel.
4. Handling : very predictable, you'll know exactly what the car's gonna do, whether it'll do an understeer or oversteer.
5. Wear : I don't know about the wear yet but some guys on the forum said that these tires are really durable.
6. Comfort : Don't buy this if you wanted comfort since the sidewall is quite stiff and the noise is stupid loud, especially on the highway.
7. Buy again : Overall it's a pretty good tyre for the price and what they are. For street use, they have more grip than you need and on the touge it's very predictable and will take some spirited driving abuse. I like them so far, definitely gonna buy again.
Writing about the Bridgestone Adrenalin RE003 given 66% (185-55-15-)
Driving on mostly motorways for 30 average miles
Driving on mostly motorways for 30 average miles
Good for daily drive. Not that good on wet roads. The tire slips when I accelerate on wet road. I used this on my Honda Fit which isn't that powerful. It is also very noisy when the thread is around 50%.
Writing about the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 given 73% (195-50-16-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 15000 spirited miles
Driving on a combination of roads for 15000 spirited miles
For me this tyre is really good with the price given. Early life tyre is so good. I can drove the car at the coner with really good speed. After 1 year of usage can see abit difference, tyre not grip as when it in early life but still ok and good. When u drove at puddle really good due the tyre design.