Menu
Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 View Gallery (2)
165-205/45-70 R13-17 107 sizes 2012

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150

The Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 is a Premium Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.5
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
75%
Wet Grip
68%
Road Feedback
67%
Handling
67%
Wear
65%
Comfort
68%
Buy again
52%
69 Reviews
66% Average
1,184,552 miles driven
2 Tests (avg: 3rd)
Bridgestone Ecopia EP150

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150

Summer Premium
BETA
6.5 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 2
Publications: 1
Period: 2011 - 2014
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 69
Avg Rating: 66%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.13
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2014 ADAC 175/65 R14 Summer Tyre Test ADAC 2014 175/65 R14 4/16 0 metrics
2011 European Summer Tyre Test - 195/65 R15 ADAC 2011 195/65 r15 2/14 0 metrics
2
Tests
3rd
Average
2nd
Best
4th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
4th/16
Very balanced tire with top grade on dry pavement, good in the wet
Slightly higher fuel consumption and wear
Very balanced tyre, scores well in all safety related tests.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
14 inch
185/70 R14 88 H E D 70
175/65 R14 82 S D C 67
175/65 R14 82 T E D 67
185/70 R14 88 H E D 70
175/65R14 82 H B C 69
185/60R14 82 H B C 67
185/70R14 88 T B C 67
175/65 R14 82 H C C 70
185/70R14 88 H D A 70
175/65R14 82 H D A 70
175/65R14 82 H D D 70
15 inch
185/65 R15 88 H D C 68
185/65 R15 88 H A B 70
185/65 R15 88 H A B 70
195/65 R15 91 T A A 69
195/65 R15 91 T A A 69
185/65 R15 88 H D C 68
195/65 R15 91 H B C 68
185/65 R15 88 H A B 70
185/65 R15 88 H A B 70
185/65R15 88 H D C 68
185/65R15 88 H D C 68
195/65R15 91 H B A 71
195/65R15 95 H XL A A 68
195/65 R15 91 H B B 70
195/65 R15 91 H B B 70
195/65 R15 91 H A C 70
195/65 R15 91 H A C 70
195/65 R15 91 H A B 70
195/65 R15 91 H A B 70
195/65 R15 91 H A C 70
195/65 R15 91 H B C 69
195/65 R15 91 T B B 69
195/65R15 91 H C A 70
185/65R15 88 H C A 70
195/65 R15 91 H B C 69
195/65 R15 91 H A B 70
195/65 R15 91 H A B 70
195/65 R15 91 H A B 70
185/65R15 88 H D C 68
16 inch
205/60 R16 92 H B B 71
205/55R16 91 V B A 70
205/55R16 91 V B B 70
205/55 R16 91 V B B 71
205/55 R16 91 V B B 71
205/55 R16 91 V B B 71
205/55R16 91 V B A 71
205/55R16 91 V B B 71
205/55 R16 91 V B B 71
205/55 R16 91 V B B 71
205/55 R16 91 V B B 70
205/55R16 91 V C C 70
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 >>

Questions and Answers for the Bridgestone Ecopia EP150

Ask a question
August 12, 2017

Is this tyre strong or it can be cut easily

As a low rolling resistance tyre the Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 will have thinner sidewalls than "normal" tyres, which could mean it punctures more easily than you are used to.
October 2, 2018

Hi, I plan to buy a Suzuki Ignis in France. Apparently, this awd model (allgrip) comes with Ecopia EP150 175/60 R16 82H. I just had a chat with Firestone in the USA. They sent me a link saying those Ecopia are all-seasons tires!!! Everywhere I read the contrary. Should I urgently change my glasses? Could you please confirm me this information?

As listed on Tyre Reviews, the Ecopia EP150 is a summer tyre. While it is fine for 3 seasons in Paris, it will not perform in snow and ice so if you need this capability you should fit an all season or winter tyre.
June 25, 2025

My Corolla E170 has a heavy steering as per the design. If i need slightly less heavy steering, then is Ecopia 150 a good choice? It’s available in the size otherwise it’s XM2+, UC6, Alnac 4G, Turanza t001 Also what factors mentioned in this website are the most important like less rolling resistance, handling , dry grip etc? Thanks in advance

We have not tested the EP150 directly but your theory that a low rolling resistance tyre should offer lighter steering is a good one. That said, the difference a tyre can make to overall steering weight is pretty small so don't expect a drastic change!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Size Price Range  
185/55 R16 £141.99 - £141.99 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
205/55 R16 £104.99 - £104.99 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
Available in 5 tyre sizes - View all.

Review Summary

Based on 59 user reviews

Drivers report that the Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 excels in comfort, low rolling resistance for some, and often delivers long tread life, with several high-mileage owners praising durability and quietness when new. However, many users-especially in lower- and mid-scoring reviews-criticize wet grip, noting wheelspin, understeer, and unsafe feeling in rain, along with increasing noise over time and mixed wear results. Fuel economy benefits are inconsistent, with some seeing savings and others reporting no improvement or worse MPG. Overall sentiment is mixed, skewing slightly negative due to widespread wet-performance complaints despite a solid minority of very positive long-wear experiences.

Strengths
  • Comfort
  • Dry grip (moderate-driving)
  • Tread life/durability (many high-mileage reports)
  • Low rolling resistance/fuel economy (some users)
  • Quiet when new
Areas for Improvement
  • Wet grip/traction (wheelspin
  • Understeer)
  • Road noise increases with wear
  • Inconsistent/fast wear for some users
  • Fuel economy benefits inconsistent

Top 3 Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 Reviews

Given 61% while driving a Volkswagen 2016 Beetle 1.4 twincharged 210hp (215/60 R16) on a combination of roads for 12,000 spirited miles
Really comfy tire, good wear, but at 32 psi I would lose traction in wet conditions without even going full throttle, in first and second gear, also in dry conditions sometimes. If turning a bit fast in the wet the tire just don't grip that well and understeer a quiet a bit more than what I would be comfortable with. This tire is good if u want something comfortable that would last a decent time and you don't push or throw your car around
July 31, 2025
Given 59% while driving a Toyota Yaris (175/65 R14) on mostly town for 10 average miles
Ecopia 150 is a fuel economy tyre with less rolling resistance. So, do not expect this tyre to well perform in wet weather! I got this experience from a minor accident during rainny days. Now, I am changing to Dunlop SP Sport J6
March 1, 2025
Given 74% while driving a Toyota Corolla (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 37,282 spirited miles
Ive used this tyre for 32 miles / 65KM and it was very good overall compared to my aggressive driving style with sharp maneuvering and high speeds on highways reaching 180km/hr, it was very good in dry asphalt conditions, good in wet with easy comfort driving supposedly we should be careful in wet conditions, very good in handling as the wear is very good as it lasted till 32 miles without cracking or tearing apart. However there are better model options from Hankook ventuse prime 3 ive used for the same milage that I highly recommend.
April 25, 2025

How would you rate the Bridgestone Ecopia EP150?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 Reviews

Given 51% while driving a Toyota Corolla (205/55 R16) on mostly country roads for 40,000 average miles
I have driven 40,000 km, I got them installed on a new Toyota Corolla 1.5, I drive a little above average dynamically mostly on out-of-town roads and highways. They are good for average driving in the rain carefully, wear is satisfactory, they are quite loud, I have not had any defects, I will not buy them again, the price is high compared to the competition, now they still have 1-2 mm to the mark worn.
October 31, 2025
Given 61% while driving a Toyota Corolla (225/55 R16) on mostly motorways for 20,000 easy going miles
It’s definitely a comfort-biased tire, an OE set on a Toyota Corolla. The wet grip is nice and especially the rolling resistance is good, with very little feedback from the steering. The wear isn’t great but it probably had a very low starting tread depth anyway, so I won’t buy it again as I think there are more longer-lasting touring tires out there that’ll provide a more engaging driving experience.
April 11, 2025
Given 91% while driving a Toyota Prius (195/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 90,000 easy going miles
These tyres were on my car from new and were replaced when needed with same - 90,000 miles over 3 years. No complaints at all and were very quiet and effective throughout - I will use them again happily.
December 25, 2024
Given 100% while driving a Renault Clio 900cc Authentique 5dr (66kw) (185/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
I love these tyres, bought my car with them, my car is over 4 years old with 90 000km's and the tyres are close to being replaced now but not worn.
I've hit so many ugly potholes and where people got flat tyres mine is still 100%.
December 5, 2024
Given 60% while driving a Toyota Yaris (185/60 R15) on mostly town for 30,000 average miles
Driven 50k kilometers for 7 years. Tyre is generally Ok. Still have 4 mm tread depth. Still no grip issue but considering replace due to micro cracks seen on tread.
October 30, 2024
Given 39% while driving a Suzuki XBEE (175/60 R16) on a combination of roads for 19,000 average miles
This was the oem tyre for my car. It had decent grip for my driving need. Wore out quickly. Had uneven wearing though.
August 27, 2024
Given 79% while driving a Suzuki Baleno (185/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 0 spirited miles
The grip and handling, at the120-180 km/t is quite good(if the tracking and balancing of the wheels is in order)
Changing tires now, after 65.000km, over the last 7 years ..mostly due to the age of the tires)
June 17, 2024
Given 33% while driving a Toyota Corolla Altis (205/55 R16) on mostly town for 9,000 easy going miles
One of the worst tyre I've ever use

15.000 km and already cracked
March 29, 2024
Given 81% while driving a Nissan tida (185/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 0 easy going miles
Very pleased always try to buy these tyre for my 2 Nissan Tilda no more bumpy rides 100/PC please
March 20, 2024
Given 20% while driving a Toyota 2006 Avalon (205/55 R16) on mostly motorways for 2,200 easy going miles
Hey folks please don’t buy It, It is very inappropriate specially for their robustness, poor in grip as well, I had upload my damaged tyre and it’s been 2 months old only and I have drive car purposefully 35-40 km per day average. Its only run 3300 kilometres and Results could see in images.
March 12, 2024
Given 67% while driving a Suzuki Swift (185/55 R16) on mostly motorways for 900 easy going miles
Hard to say about grip in wet and dry they seem OK and wear who knows but it's a new car they are OE factory fitted, the car ride is comfortable handles well with modest roll then again its a light modestly powered car. The mpg is around 60 the biggest downside is the noise on some road surfaces it might be made worse on s light car like this bit it's the worst of our cars.
November 26, 2023
Given 59% while driving a (175/65 R14) on mostly town for 7,000 spirited miles
Good budget tyre. But noisy, yet still comfort. In terms of handling it's worse than the stock tyre ATLAS. Understeer a bit when taking corners. Wet grip is okay and better than my old stock tyre.
October 7, 2023
Rate the Bridgestone Ecopia EP150