Menu

Vredestein Sportrac 2

The Vredestein Sportrac 2 is a High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.2
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
76%
Wet Grip
86%
Road Feedback
77%
Handling
79%
Wear
87%
Comfort
66%
Buy again
76%
7 Reviews
78% Average
138,500 miles driven
Vredestein Sportrac 2

Vredestein Sportrac 2

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
7.2 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 7
Avg Rating: 77.9%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 2.16
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Vredestein Sportrac 2

Questions and Answers for the Vredestein Sportrac 2

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Vredestein Sportrac 2. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Vredestein Sportrac 2 Reviews

Given 70% while driving a Skoda Fabia 1.2 (205/50 R17) on mostly motorways for 3,000 average miles
The Sportrak 2 are very noisy especially when you are slowing down
Ask a question | Helpful 783
April 23, 2025
Given 100% while driving a Ford Granada Scorpio Mk 3 2.9i 24V V6 Cosworth (BOA) (205/50 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 40,000 average miles
Vehicle: 1994 Ford Granada Mk3 Scorpio 2.9i 24V V6 Cosworth (BOA)
Tyres : Vredestein Sportrac 2 205/50/16

Had the same Vredestein Sportrac 2 tyres fitted on my Ford Granada for over 10 years! Probably covered around circ. 40,000 miles. Broken bottle in road punctured the offside front tyre immediately. Never had any issues with the tyres, always good grip on road, never felt car wheel spin or loose traction. Driven car many times during frost, ice and snow on road--never felt car loose grip. Just purchased new tyres. This time trying the Vredestien Sportrac 5 205/45/16.
March 26, 2015
Given 79% while driving a BMW E34 5 Series (225/60 R15 W) on mostly town for 40,000 spirited miles
good tyre for its price!
April 11, 2012
Have you driven on the Vredestein Sportrac 2 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Vredestein Sportrac 2? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Vredestein Sportrac 2 >

Latest Vredestein Sportrac 2 Reviews

Given 37% while driving a Lexus GS300 (225/55 R16 W) on a combination of roads for 1,500 average miles
Abslotue Rubbish in all aspects, stay awy from this.
Poor traction, Poor braking and handling, Poor feedback, Noisy.
Only thing is that they are comfy and cushion the ride but because of this you lose a lot os precision and feel
Cannot say anything about wear i changed after 1500 miles (they were fitted when i bought my car.

Vredestein is a dutch product and regarded as 'just below premium'over here and generally do well in tests and beig dutch I really wanted to like them but I really cannot, they just lack all the qualities you need in a tyre for a vehicle of the size, weight and power that mine has.
December 27, 2010
Given 91% while driving a Volvo 850 T5 Estate (205/50 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 18,000 spirited miles
I have to say after having these tyres and running for 18k miles on them, my friend, a tyre specialist suggested I replace them with just over 2mm left on the front ones, the rear ones hardly looked used, having 5-6mm on them! Sounds like not a lot I changed them for Goodyear Eagles. Boy did I regret that, I should haave stayed with the ST2's. I have had close shaves in braaking on the ST2's and you know they are good when the ABS doesn't kick in and the tyres actually stop the car. This wasn't the case on the eagles with the same weather and road conditions.... Get these tyres, they are superb in the wet/dry and are budget price for a superb tyre. I have even had my auto (without traction control) pull in the snow with little hassle. From a company who make the space savers for 911 porsches, yes, you will trust them now.....
October 27, 2008
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 74% while driving a Rover MG ZR 120 (205/50 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 30,000 spirited miles
Fitted the Vredestein sporttrack2's after a terrible time with the factory fit Michelin Pilot Exalto's. I was looking for a tyre that provided predictable, reponsive behavior in both wet and dry conditions without sacrificing too much in terms of tyre life.

The ST2s ticked most boxes and are generally a superb tyre, living up to the hype of professional tyre testing.

Wet grip is the best I've tried. High speed motorway running in severe conditions (traffic permitting) resulted in a rock solid straight line performace, with good feel and never aquaplaning unit hitting some serious standing water. Running in the truck ruts of the inside lane of most British motorways at 70mph in moderate rain was never an issue. On back roads, good feedback and excellent lateral grip resulted in cornering speeds far higher than I had thought possible, and only a little slower than possible in the dry. When limits were broached, the breakaway point was easy to feel and progressive.

No 'non-snow' tyre is that good in the white stuff, but for a summer tyre, I never got suck in upto 6" of the stuff & the progressive breakaway is great fun! ;-)

Dry handling was good, but the open tread pattern that is so good in the wet robs the tyre of outright grip in the dry, probably the reason for such little difference in wet and dry cornering. (also consider the ZR is setup to understeer like mad probably does not help this).

The ST2s weak point is comfort and noise. The side wall is stiff, resulting in great feedback but an uncomfortable ride. The ST2 is also notable noiser than the pervious Michelin, Perelli, BFGoodrich and Dunlops used.

Tyre life of 30,000 isn't bad considering 50% of this has been some very spirited B road driving. This compares to 47,000 for the OE fit Michelins.

Would I recommend them, yes but now the ST3 is out it is probably better bet. I'm moving onto the Ultrac in search of better dry cornering & someting quieter.


August 28, 2008