Menu
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 View Gallery (2)
195-255/45-70 R16-20 46 sizes 2019

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61

The Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 is a Premium Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.8
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Medium Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
95%
Wet Grip
89%
Road Feedback
85%
Handling
91%
Wear
86%
Comfort
72%
Buy again
77%
11 Reviews
85% Average
68,602 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 7th)
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
6.8 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Medium Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Comfort
80
0.32x / 2 tests
Dry
63.2
1.8x / 2 tests
Wet
61.3
2x / 5 tests
Value
50.3
0.42x / 4 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Handling
70.5
2 tests
Braking
61.1
2 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 11
Avg Rating: 84.9%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.93
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 EV Tyre Test Auto Bild 2025 215/55 R18 7/8 13 metrics
1
Tests
7th
Average
7th
Best
7th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2025 EV Tyre Test
215/55 R18 • 2025
7th/8
The Yokohama BluEarth-XT recorded the quietest passing noise in the test (68.7 dB at 80 km/h), making it ideal for silent EVs. Its dry performance was reasonable, but wet weather capabilities showed weaknesses, particularly in aquaplaning resistance where it recorded the lowest values. With a projected lifespan of 30,280km and high rolling resistance (7.58 kg/t), its range impact was 373.1km. The tyre received a "satisfactory" rating for its mixed performance profile.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
16 inch
205/60R16 92 V C A 68
215/70R16 100 H C A 68
215/60R16 95 V C A 68
17 inch
215/55R17 94 V C A 68
235/65R17 108 V C A 68
225/60R17 99 V C A 68
18 inch
235/60R18 103 W C A 68
235/60R18 103 H B C 69
20 inch
255/45R20 105 W C A 68
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 >>

Questions and Answers for the Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 10 user reviews

Drivers largely praise the Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 for strong dry and wet grip, stable handling from its stiff sidewalls, and good value, with several noting reduced cabin noise versus previous tyres and reasonable wear. Comfort and noise are the main trade-offs: multiple users report firmness and increased noise on rough or aged surfaces, though a few found it quiet and comfortable on smooth roads.

Strengths
  • Dry grip
  • Wet grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • Stable handling and steering response
  • Value/price
  • Tread wear/longevity
  • Noise levels (on smooth roads)
Areas for Improvement
  • Ride comfort/harshness on rough surfaces
  • Road noise on aged/rough surfaces

Top 3 Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 Reviews

Given 89% while driving a BMW X3 (245/50 R19) on a combination of roads for 3,000 spirited miles
These tyres are pretty amazing. I live in a place with equally wet and hot weather all year round. The price point for these premium brand tyres is the first thing that caught my eye. Following good online reviews, I decided to try it out. Dry grip is great on my SUV. Managing corners at relatively higher speeds had no issues. The harder side walls made handling the car stable. Steering and handling is responsive and sharp. Braking wise the tyres performed pretty well for the traffic I faced. In the wet weather, I encountered zero aquaplaning situations. The tyres performed exactly as what it was rated as. Of course driving in the rain would be more cautious and slower usually, but for me, it was not too much of a difference between wet and dry. The tyres felt pretty comfortable, however, I personally prefer stiffer suspensions and tyres as my driving style is slightly more aggressive. These tyres definitely felt better than the Alenzas I used which were extremely “bouncy”. Hopefully these tyres are as durable as stated. If it’s true, I’ll definitely buy again. Road noise wise it was pretty unnoticeable for my car. I guess it’s also dependent on how soundproof one’s car is.
The other tyre I was comparing it against with is the Giti P10. Might try that next.
February 17, 2025
Given 83% while driving a Suzuki Vitara 2015> (235/55 R18) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
No comment only downside the noise level but still acceptable.
February 6, 2025
Given 92% while driving a Toyota Harrier (225/55 R19) on mostly town for 0 average miles
I am giving this review after driving 6000km i have to say this tyres are very good handling in both dry and wet conditions i also noticed that the car cabin noise decreased from my last tyres which was already quiet the name continental ultra contact 6 overall my car comport increased on smother road and on pothole road it is better than the continental ultracontact on bumpy road so definitely will buy again
December 29, 2024

How would you rate the Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 Reviews

Given 84% while driving a Suzuki grand vitara (235/55 R17) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
Good tyres but I assume the side wall to stiff and noisy is the minus point . The rest of it I’m happy with it .
January 20, 2025
Given 62% while driving a Toyota (215/65 R17) on mostly motorways for 9,000 average miles
When I am look tires for my newly buy used Alphard Hybrid, I was attracted by the ad saying the AE61 is quiet and comfortable. However after trying for 2 months 9000 km. I found it's comfortability and qietness only realize on those newly build road surface. In Japan most road is good but it it not the case in the rest of the world. It is bumpy and noisy on those aged road surface. Grip and handling is ok. Tire wall is too stiff. I will look for another brand after 50k km.
January 28, 2023
Given 94% while driving a Lexus RX300 (235/55 R20) on a combination of roads for 15,000 average miles
Strong grip on dry ground, strong drainage in rainy days, good support, and buy next time
December 18, 2022
Given 84% while driving a Toyota 2006 Avalon (235/55 R19) on mostly town for 13,000 miles
Having tried many types of tyres in my 30+ years of driving, I finally have an opportunity to try out the latest AE61 on my new car. After 22000 km, in wet, ponding and dry weather mainly in city driving. I found it to be very responsive, good performance in wet and dry braking and good stability. Tyre wear is very even and about 55%. So tread-wear is very reasonable for a “performance” tyre. Shoulder is rigid and provide stable cornering even in ponding conditions. It was also cheaper by about 30 USD than the branded tyres I intended to buy. Certainly worth my $ so far. Need to see how will the tyres performed when reaching 20% of tread left. It’s fuel efficient too although my car is a hybrid.
June 30, 2022
Given 80% while driving a Toyota Raize (225/55 R18) on a combination of roads for 3,600 spirited miles
Handling is pretty good,even on wet conditions and not so smooth surface,the grip i would say is amazing the downside is when you go on unpaved road the tire is far from comfortable
June 29, 2022
Given 77% while driving a Kia Motors Sportage (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 miles
This tyre is not gives comfortable feels but road grip is good also one thing more is that feels too much noise in cabin. So I will not purchase again and not recommended these tyres.
March 18, 2022
Given 100% while driving a Ford Ecosport (205/60 R16) on for 10,000 spirited miles
The best tire for my compact SUV. Top grip in dry and wet.
February 27, 2022
Rate the Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61