155/65 R14 Tyres
Everything we know about the 155/65 R14 tyre size: 37 owner reviews covering 187,617 miles of driving, and EU label data for the tyres you can actually buy in it.
- 37owner reviews
- 187,617 milescovered on them
- 467tyres made in this size
The quick answer
| Season | Owners' pick | Owner rating | Latest test winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winter | Continental WinterContact TS 800 8 Current version: Continental WinterContact TS 870 | 86% from 3 reviews | - |
Owner picks are the highest weighted owner score in 155/65 R14; test winners come from the most recent independent test conducted in this size. The full evidence is below.
The best rated 155/65 R14 tyres
Rated only by drivers running this size. Each tyre needs at least 3 reviews in 155/65 R14 to be ranked; the order weights a tyre's score by how many reviews back it, so one glowing review cannot top a table.
Winter tyres
The highest rated Winter tyre in 155/65 R14 is the Continental WinterContact TS 800 - 86% from 3 owner reviews in this size. The current tyre in that line is now the Continental WinterContact TS 870.
| # | Tyre | Owner rating | Reviews | Distance reviewed | TR Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
86% | 3 | 20,000 miles | 8 |
Want test data as well as owner opinion? Best Winter Tyres → Test winner: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
TR Score is the tyre's overall Tyre Reviews rating out of 10, built from independent test results and every owner review of that tyre - not just the reviews from this car. The owner rating column is this car only.
155/65 R14 EU tyre label data
EU label values are declared for each individual size, so the figures here are exact for 155/65 R14 rather than a range across a model. 335 tyres carry label data in this size. The most common load index is 75 (up to 387 kg per tyre). Speed ratings on offer: H (210 km/h), T (190 km/h), S (180 km/h), Q (160 km/h). 210 tyres in this size carry the 3PMSF severe snow marking.
A Best wet grip
11 tyres in this size hold the top EU wet grip rating, class A. The highest scoring on Tyre Reviews:
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 Winter 8.9
- Falken Sincera SN832 Ecorun Summer 8.8
- Bridgestone Turanza T005 Summer 8.6
- Continental UltraContact Summer 8.5
- Sailun Atrezzo 4Seasons Ultra All Season 8.5
- Norauto Prevensys 4 Summer 8.1
B Lowest rolling resistance
The most fuel efficient choice: 3 tyres in this size reach rolling resistance class B. The highest scoring on Tyre Reviews:
- Michelin e.Primacy Summer 8.2
- Nokian Hakka Green 3 Summer 7.5
- Continental EcoContact 6 Summer 7.5
67dB Quietest tyres
The quietest 155/65 R14 tyres are labelled at 67 dB external noise:
- Linglong Sport Master 4S All Season 8.7
- Nokian WR D4 Winter 8.5
- Linglong Grip Master 4S All Season 8.5
- Michelin e.Primacy Summer 8.2
- Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Summer 8.2
- Nokian iLine Summer 8.2
Label values come from the EU EPREL database and apply to the EU market versions of each tyre. Wet grip and rolling resistance run from class A (best) to E; noise is the measured drive-by figure. A good label is a floor, not a verdict - the tests and owner ratings above tell you far more.
What does 155/65 R14 mean?
A 155/65 R14 tyre is 155 mm wide, its sidewall is 65% of that width (101 mm) tall, and it fits a 14 inch wheel. That gives an overall diameter of roughly 557 mm.
| Section width | 155 mm |
|---|---|
| Sidewall height | 101 mm |
| Rim diameter | 14" (356 mm) |
| Overall diameter | ≈ 557 mm |
| Circumference | ≈ 1,750 mm |
| Revolutions per km | ≈ 571 |
| Revolutions per mile | ≈ 920 |
Also written as
155/65R14 155/65 ZR14 155-65-14 155 65 14
Figures are calculated from the nominal size. A loaded, rolling tyre runs a few percent smaller, and true widths vary slightly between makes.
What cars use 155/65 R14 tyres?
The cars most often running this size in our owner reviews. Each links to the best rated tyres for that exact car.
Every tyre reviewed in 155/65 R14
The complete record, including discontinued tyres and tyres with too few reviews to rank, ordered by the amount of evidence. A further 28 tyres have a single review each; they count toward the totals but are not listed.
| Tyre | Season | Owner rating | Reviews | Distance reviewed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continental WinterContact TS 800 Replaced by Continental WinterContact TS 870 | Winter | 86% | 3 | 20,000 miles |
| Rotalla RH02 E Pace | Summer | 88% | 2 | 1,000 miles |
| Nexen N Blue ECO | Summer | 75% | 2 | 21,838 miles |
| Falken Sincera SN832 Ecorun Replaced by Falken Sincera SN110 Ecorun | Summer | 68% | 2 | 18,010 miles |
Reviews only cover part of the market: 467 tyres are made in 155/65 R14. Browse every 155/65 R14 tyre →
What drivers say about their 155/65 R14 tyres
The most recent owner reviews fitted in this size, in their own words.
The price/quality ratio is quite good, but the wear is a little too fast if you drive dynamically. After 15,000 km they are about 75% worn. You can't have everything.
On dry ground they are difficult to fault, on wet ground you feel the limit arrive more quickly, but it is progressive. The rear axle is simply unbreakable regardless of the road conditions and the driving style adopted.
The front axle was mounted in "Feu Vert Efficiency", the road holding of the Falken is generally a little better in the wet, but really superior in the dry.
When they are completely worn out, I definitely plan to get the same ones again.
My tires were 145/80r12 to begin with, Yokohama Job, RY52 with 8000km. A decent truck eco tire.
Car is Subaru Sambar van, a rebadged Daihatsu Hijet cargo.
I'm reviewing with all traction control and stability control off.
Dry grip, is way better. With the RY52, rear slides when I wanted it to. With Energy saver4, it just won't slide even I give full gas out of a tight corner. This van doesn't have enough power to power slide Energy saver4 on high grip surface.
Wet grip, is also better but mostly in lateral grip. RY52 have very good vertical grip ( accelerate and decelerate ). I haven't try to slide it yet in wet surface.
Feed back, is surprisingly out of my expectation. Best tire pressure for RY52 is F/R: 45/45 psi. For Energy saver is F/R: 45/48 psi.
RY52 have a larger range of tire pressure that can be driven, Front pressure is good from 42-45. Rear is good from 40-50. With 50PSI in the rear, I do feel a bit on the edge in the wet.
Energy saver4 however, is very tricky to set tire pressure.
Front can not be lower than 45. There will be no feed back. Rear can not be higher than 48, it will produce lots of noise.
Rear is best setting at 45 (or lower) but with F/R both 45, the car wants to understeer. Therefore I've settled with F 45. R 48.
Another thing is RY52 have way better handling feed back mid corner. I feel every bit of the tire, with Energy saver4, I know the general direction but not which part of the tire is gripping exactly. I don't think Energy Saver4 is to blame here, since RY52 is super hard LT tire.
Handling, it's higher than the testing vehicle. I'm at jail speed with 53 horse power on all the route ( mountain and twisting ) with +30km/hr faster than RY52, still I'm only afraid of the van rolling over , and not even a squeak heard. I don't think this van needs better grip than Energy saver.
Comfort, is something that you instantly feel, I feel it, my wife feels it. It way quieter and softer than RY52. I would say this aspect is what most people feels.
Finally, fuel economy. The wheel + tire set up is 6kg heavier per corner (12 to 14, RY52 to Energy saver), which is 24kg heavier for four wheels.
It is a lot heavier. In the stop and go city, fuel economy drops 1-2%. On mountain road it's within margin of error ( Screen shows better). On 60-90km/hr highway, it is 3-5% better.
There is no other way around the weight. During stop and go, you need more energy. During climbing, you need more energy.
But the eco compound that Michelin uses does provide lower friction therefore the fuel economy haven't worsen.
Drive on 155/65 R14 tyres?
Review your tyres and help the next driver choose. It takes about five minutes, and every review on this page came from a driver who took them.
Where this data comes from
Owner ratings are submitted through the review form on this site, naming the tyre, the size and the distance covered, and are checked by hand before publication. Test results come from independent published tyre tests indexed by size, and label values from the EU EPREL database.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 using independent test results and the full body of owner reviews, so you can check a car-specific ranking against the wider evidence.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.

