Menu

155/65 R14 Tyres

Everything we know about the 155/65 R14 tyre size: 37 owner reviews covering 187,617 miles of driving, and EU label data for the tyres you can actually buy in it.

  • 37owner reviews
  • 187,617 milescovered on them
  • 467tyres made in this size
155/65 R14 To scale, mm
Ø 557 155 101 14" 101

The quick answer

The quick answer - 155/65 R14
Season Owners' pick Owner rating Latest test winner
Winter Continental WinterContact TS 800 8 Current version: Continental WinterContact TS 870 86% from 3 reviews -

Owner picks are the highest weighted owner score in 155/65 R14; test winners come from the most recent independent test conducted in this size. The full evidence is below.

The best rated 155/65 R14 tyres

Rated only by drivers running this size. Each tyre needs at least 3 reviews in 155/65 R14 to be ranked; the order weights a tyre's score by how many reviews back it, so one glowing review cannot top a table.

Winter tyres

The highest rated Winter tyre in 155/65 R14 is the Continental WinterContact TS 800 - 86% from 3 owner reviews in this size. The current tyre in that line is now the Continental WinterContact TS 870.

Winter tyres ranked by owner rating in 155/65 R14
# Tyre Owner rating Reviews Distance reviewed TR Score
1 Continental WinterContact TS 800 Replaced by Continental WinterContact TS 870 86% 3 20,000 miles 8

Want test data as well as owner opinion? Best Winter Tyres → Test winner: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3

TR Score is the tyre's overall Tyre Reviews rating out of 10, built from independent test results and every owner review of that tyre - not just the reviews from this car. The owner rating column is this car only.

155/65 R14 EU tyre label data

EU label values are declared for each individual size, so the figures here are exact for 155/65 R14 rather than a range across a model. 335 tyres carry label data in this size. The most common load index is 75 (up to 387 kg per tyre). Speed ratings on offer: H (210 km/h), T (190 km/h), S (180 km/h), Q (160 km/h). 210 tyres in this size carry the 3PMSF severe snow marking.

A Best wet grip

11 tyres in this size hold the top EU wet grip rating, class A. The highest scoring on Tyre Reviews:

B Lowest rolling resistance

The most fuel efficient choice: 3 tyres in this size reach rolling resistance class B. The highest scoring on Tyre Reviews:

67dB Quietest tyres

The quietest 155/65 R14 tyres are labelled at 67 dB external noise:

Label values come from the EU EPREL database and apply to the EU market versions of each tyre. Wet grip and rolling resistance run from class A (best) to E; noise is the measured drive-by figure. A good label is a floor, not a verdict - the tests and owner ratings above tell you far more.

What does 155/65 R14 mean?

A 155/65 R14 tyre is 155 mm wide, its sidewall is 65% of that width (101 mm) tall, and it fits a 14 inch wheel. That gives an overall diameter of roughly 557 mm.

155/65 R14 nominal dimensions
Section width155 mm
Sidewall height101 mm
Rim diameter14" (356 mm)
Overall diameter≈ 557 mm
Circumference≈ 1,750 mm
Revolutions per km≈ 571
Revolutions per mile≈ 920

Also written as

155/65R14 155/65 ZR14 155-65-14 155 65 14

Figures are calculated from the nominal size. A loaded, rolling tyre runs a few percent smaller, and true widths vary slightly between makes.

Comparing two sizes? Use the tyre size calculator →

Every tyre reviewed in 155/65 R14

The complete record, including discontinued tyres and tyres with too few reviews to rank, ordered by the amount of evidence. A further 28 tyres have a single review each; they count toward the totals but are not listed.

All tyres reviewed in 155/65 R14
Tyre Season Owner rating Reviews Distance reviewed
Continental WinterContact TS 800 Replaced by Continental WinterContact TS 870 Winter 86% 3 20,000 miles
Rotalla RH02 E Pace Summer 88% 2 1,000 miles
Nexen N Blue ECO Summer 75% 2 21,838 miles
Falken Sincera SN832 Ecorun Replaced by Falken Sincera SN110 Ecorun Summer 68% 2 18,010 miles

Reviews only cover part of the market: 467 tyres are made in 155/65 R14. Browse every 155/65 R14 tyre →

What drivers say about their 155/65 R14 tyres

The most recent owner reviews fitted in this size, in their own words.

49%
Fulda EcoControl HP 155/65 R14 Peugeot 107 2,000 miles April 28, 2026
Got these tyres on a used car mostly for driving around town, they were 5 years old with no visible wear. On dry roads it had okayish grip .Absolutely horrible in wet, on anything but asphalt road, you can expect ABS triggering when braking little bit harder or understeer when turning into a harder corner. Had them on the car for the few months in late summer, early autumn. Got rid of them happily in favour of winter tyres (Hankook winter i*cept RS2) which felt much better. Maybe on a heavier car wet grip could be little bit better, but it would probably still be quite bad.
80%
Hankook Winter i cept RS2 155/65 R14 Peugeot 107 2,000 miles April 28, 2026
Had this tyre on two small cars both 14 inches radius, but different widths, mostly for driving around town in central/southeast Europe with quite some rainy days, there were also some highway stints with no observed drawbacks. Decent dry and wet grip for winter tyres at lower speeds. Snow grip was better than expected and you can feel confident in the grip for everyday driving. Did not notice a lot of difference between summer and this tyre regarding noise in the cabin.
80%
Falken Sincera SN110 Ecorun 155/65 R14 Citroën C1 10,000 miles August 7, 2025
First mounted on the rear 30,000 km ago, then now on all 4 wheels for about 15,000 km. It is difficult to find quality tires that are safe in my size.
The price/quality ratio is quite good, but the wear is a little too fast if you drive dynamically. After 15,000 km they are about 75% worn. You can't have everything.

On dry ground they are difficult to fault, on wet ground you feel the limit arrive more quickly, but it is progressive. The rear axle is simply unbreakable regardless of the road conditions and the driving style adopted.
The front axle was mounted in "Feu Vert Efficiency", the road holding of the Falken is generally a little better in the wet, but really superior in the dry.

When they are completely worn out, I definitely plan to get the same ones again.
83%
Michelin Energy Saver 4 155/65 R14 Subaru 04 baja 500 miles April 28, 2024
I'm reviewing it base on it price and other interchangeable tires.
My tires were 145/80r12 to begin with, Yokohama Job, RY52 with 8000km. A decent truck eco tire.
Car is Subaru Sambar van, a rebadged Daihatsu Hijet cargo.

I'm reviewing with all traction control and stability control off.
Dry grip, is way better. With the RY52, rear slides when I wanted it to. With Energy saver4, it just won't slide even I give full gas out of a tight corner. This van doesn't have enough power to power slide Energy saver4 on high grip surface.
Wet grip, is also better but mostly in lateral grip. RY52 have very good vertical grip ( accelerate and decelerate ). I haven't try to slide it yet in wet surface.

Feed back, is surprisingly out of my expectation. Best tire pressure for RY52 is F/R: 45/45 psi. For Energy saver is F/R: 45/48 psi.
RY52 have a larger range of tire pressure that can be driven, Front pressure is good from 42-45. Rear is good from 40-50. With 50PSI in the rear, I do feel a bit on the edge in the wet.
Energy saver4 however, is very tricky to set tire pressure.
Front can not be lower than 45. There will be no feed back. Rear can not be higher than 48, it will produce lots of noise.
Rear is best setting at 45 (or lower) but with F/R both 45, the car wants to understeer. Therefore I've settled with F 45. R 48.
Another thing is RY52 have way better handling feed back mid corner. I feel every bit of the tire, with Energy saver4, I know the general direction but not which part of the tire is gripping exactly. I don't think Energy Saver4 is to blame here, since RY52 is super hard LT tire.

Handling, it's higher than the testing vehicle. I'm at jail speed with 53 horse power on all the route ( mountain and twisting ) with +30km/hr faster than RY52, still I'm only afraid of the van rolling over , and not even a squeak heard. I don't think this van needs better grip than Energy saver.

Comfort, is something that you instantly feel, I feel it, my wife feels it. It way quieter and softer than RY52. I would say this aspect is what most people feels.

Finally, fuel economy. The wheel + tire set up is 6kg heavier per corner (12 to 14, RY52 to Energy saver), which is 24kg heavier for four wheels.
It is a lot heavier. In the stop and go city, fuel economy drops 1-2%. On mountain road it's within margin of error ( Screen shows better). On 60-90km/hr highway, it is 3-5% better.
There is no other way around the weight. During stop and go, you need more energy. During climbing, you need more energy.
But the eco compound that Michelin uses does provide lower friction therefore the fuel economy haven't worsen.
50%
Nexen N Blue ECO 155/65 R14 Citroën 1.0 petrol 10,000 miles August 27, 2023
Bad tyre, no fuel saving and only 15000 km normal driving and rubber is cracking. Still 3 mm on it or so but will replace it. Never buying again.
89%
Goodyear EfficientGrip Compact 155/65 R14 Hyundai Getz 1,000 miles March 2, 2022
Great tires for small cars with low hp, especially if u use small size of this tire. Good dry and wet grip even though they need a little time to warm up. The best thing about these tires that i was really astonished is their braking power especially on dry, it's like dropping anchor when i hit the brakes. Fuel economy is great too. I'm not that sure though about handling on higher speeds but yet again this tire in not meant to be for spirited driving like i am into so if u drive normally for everyday use like it was build for then is more than enough. Definitely recommend them!
84%
Pirelli Cinturato P1 Verde 155/65 R14 Hyundai Getz 1,000 miles April 19, 2021
Fit a couple of used ones in the front and i must say these tires was a pleasant surprise. Never had driven Pirelli tyres before and i was a bit hesitant about them. Even-though they were used (but in decent condition) the dry grip was very good and the dry braking was absolutely astonishing, despite the small size i used the car was braking in very short distances! Fuel efficiency improved too as i expected. Solid rubber that will do the job just fine. I recommend them!
91%
Kumho Solus HA31 155/65 R14 Peugeot 107 2,679 miles February 10, 2021
Running these on a peugeot 107. I've had kumhos on larger cars before. For my daily commuter, I thought for the price I'd give the all seasons a go to avoid a second set of winter wheels again. Over the last month the snow has been heavy, over taking slow struggling cars has a breeze. They do feel soft when warm, but the cold weather and wet grip makes up for the warm short fall. The aggressive pattern does cause a slightly higher than normal road noise at 70mph. When these wear out, I'll be buying another set. For the price on a small car, I would definitely recommend them to anyone.

Drive on 155/65 R14 tyres?

Review your tyres and help the next driver choose. It takes about five minutes, and every review on this page came from a driver who took them.

Review Your Tyres

Where this data comes from

Owner ratings are submitted through the review form on this site, naming the tyre, the size and the distance covered, and are checked by hand before publication. Test results come from independent published tyre tests indexed by size, and label values from the EU EPREL database.

About the TR Score

The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 using independent test results and the full body of owner reviews, so you can check a car-specific ranking against the wider evidence.

Who does the testing

Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.