Test Charts / Auto Bild
2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 225/45 R17
- Tyres tested
- 20
- Disciplines
- 10
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 34.2 m | Best | |
| 34.7 m | +0.50 m | |
| 34.9 m | +0.70 m | |
| 35.1 m | +0.90 m | |
| 35.1 m | +0.90 m | |
| 35.2 m | +1.00 m | |
| 35.2 m | +1.00 m | |
| 35.2 m | +1.00 m | |
| 35.2 m | +1.00 m | |
| 35.3 m | +1.10 m | |
| 35.4 m | +1.20 m | |
| 35.6 m | +1.40 m | |
| 35.7 m | +1.50 m | |
| 35.8 m | +1.60 m | |
| 35.9 m | +1.70 m | |
| 36 m | +1.80 m | |
| 36.3 m | +2.10 m | |
| 36.3 m | +2.10 m | |
| 37.1 m | +2.90 m | |
| 37.1 m | +2.90 m |
The difference between best and worst was 8.5% (2.9 m ≈ 0.6 Car Lengths).
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 118 km/h | Best | |
| 117.7 km/h | -0.30 km/h | |
| 117.5 km/h | -0.50 km/h | |
| 117.4 km/h | -0.60 km/h | |
| 117.1 km/h | -0.90 km/h | |
| 117 km/h | -1.00 km/h | |
| 116.9 km/h | -1.10 km/h | |
| 116.8 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
| 116.8 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
| 116.4 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 116.3 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 116.3 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 116.3 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 116.2 km/h | -1.80 km/h | |
| 116 km/h | -2.00 km/h | |
| 115.8 km/h | -2.20 km/h | |
| 115.7 km/h | -2.30 km/h | |
| 115.6 km/h | -2.40 km/h | |
| 115.6 km/h | -2.40 km/h | |
| 115.3 km/h | -2.70 km/h |
All the tyres in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.
Wet
3Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 28.7 m | Best | |
| 28.8 m | +0.10 m | |
| 28.9 m | +0.20 m | |
| 29 m | +0.30 m | |
| 29.6 m | +0.90 m | |
| 29.7 m | +1.00 m | |
| 29.9 m | +1.20 m | |
| 30.3 m | +1.60 m | |
| 30.8 m | +2.10 m | |
| 30.9 m | +2.20 m | |
| 31 m | +2.30 m | |
| 31.4 m | +2.70 m | |
| 31.6 m | +2.90 m | |
| 31.7 m | +3.00 m | |
| 32 m | +3.30 m | |
| 32 m | +3.30 m | |
| 32.1 m | +3.40 m | |
| 32.8 m | +4.10 m | |
| 32.9 m | +4.20 m | |
| 33.2 m | +4.50 m |
The difference between best and worst was 15.7% (4.5 m ≈ 1 Car Lengths).
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 76.5 km/h | Best | |
| 75.9 km/h | -0.60 km/h | |
| 75.7 km/h | -0.80 km/h | |
| 74.9 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 74.7 km/h | -1.80 km/h | |
| 74.5 km/h | -2.00 km/h | |
| 74.4 km/h | -2.10 km/h | |
| 74 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 73.8 km/h | -2.70 km/h | |
| 73.3 km/h | -3.20 km/h | |
| 73.2 km/h | -3.30 km/h | |
| 73.2 km/h | -3.30 km/h | |
| 73 km/h | -3.50 km/h | |
| 72.9 km/h | -3.60 km/h | |
| 72.8 km/h | -3.70 km/h | |
| 72.3 km/h | -4.20 km/h | |
| 72.2 km/h | -4.30 km/h | |
| 72.1 km/h | -4.40 km/h | |
| 72 km/h | -4.50 km/h | |
| 71.6 km/h | -4.90 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 6.4% (4.9 Km/H).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 99.7 km/h | Best | |
| 96.8 km/h | -2.90 km/h | |
| 96.1 km/h | -3.60 km/h | |
| 95.7 km/h | -4.00 km/h | |
| 95.6 km/h | -4.10 km/h | |
| 95.5 km/h | -4.20 km/h | |
| 95.1 km/h | -4.60 km/h | |
| 95 km/h | -4.70 km/h | |
| 94.9 km/h | -4.80 km/h | |
| 94.6 km/h | -5.10 km/h | |
| 94.5 km/h | -5.20 km/h | |
| 94 km/h | -5.70 km/h | |
| 93.8 km/h | -5.90 km/h | |
| 92.3 km/h | -7.40 km/h | |
| 92.2 km/h | -7.50 km/h | |
| 91.8 km/h | -7.90 km/h | |
| 91.7 km/h | -8.00 km/h | |
| 91.1 km/h | -8.60 km/h | |
| 90.8 km/h | -8.90 km/h | |
| 90.7 km/h | -9.00 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 9% (9 Km/H).
Comfort
2Subj. Comfort
Subjective Comfort Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -3.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -3.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -3.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -3.00 Points | |
| 5 Points | -4.00 Points | |
| 5 Points | -4.00 Points | |
| 5 Points | -4.00 Points | |
| 5 Points | -4.00 Points | |
| 5 Points | -4.00 Points | |
| 2 Points | -7.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 77.8% (7 Points).
Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 71.3 dB | Best | |
| 71.4 dB | +0.10 dB | |
| 71.5 dB | +0.20 dB | |
| 71.6 dB | +0.30 dB | |
| 71.7 dB | +0.40 dB | |
| 71.8 dB | +0.50 dB | |
| 71.8 dB | +0.50 dB | |
| 71.9 dB | +0.60 dB | |
| 72.2 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 72.2 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 72.3 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 72.6 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 72.6 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 72.6 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 72.7 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 73 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 73 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 73.5 dB | +2.20 dB | |
| 74.1 dB | +2.80 dB | |
| 75 dB | +3.70 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 5.2% (3.7 dB).
Value
3Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 54,210 KM | Best | |
| 51,090 KM | -3,120 KM | |
| 50,700 KM | -3,510 KM | |
| 44,850 KM | -9,360 KM | |
| 41,730 KM | -12,480 KM | |
| 41,370 KM | -12,840 KM | |
| 41,340 KM | -12,870 KM | |
| 40,560 KM | -13,650 KM | |
| 39,390 KM | -14,820 KM | |
| 39,050 KM | -15,160 KM | |
| 38,610 KM | -15,600 KM | |
| 38,220 KM | -15,990 KM | |
| 37,440 KM | -16,770 KM | |
| 35,880 KM | -18,330 KM | |
| 35,880 KM | -18,330 KM | |
| 35,490 KM | -18,720 KM | |
| 35,490 KM | -18,720 KM | |
| 30,420 KM | -23,790 KM | |
| 28,080 KM | -26,130 KM | |
| 26,520 KM | -27,690 KM |
The difference between best and worst was 51.1% (27,690 KM).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 km |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.47 Price/1000 | Best | €14.12 | |
| 8.09 Price/1000 | +1.62 Price/1000 | €12.08 | |
| 8.38 Price/1000 | +1.91 Price/1000 | €15.33 | |
| 8.45 Price/1000 | +1.98 Price/1000 | €13.88 | |
| 8.76 Price/1000 | +2.29 Price/1000 | €17.55 | |
| 8.77 Price/1000 | +2.30 Price/1000 | €16.24 | |
| 9.11 Price/1000 | +2.64 Price/1000 | €17.62 | |
| 9.19 Price/1000 | +2.72 Price/1000 | €17.90 | |
| 9.32 Price/1000 | +2.85 Price/1000 | €25.24 | |
| 9.4 Price/1000 | +2.93 Price/1000 | €18.91 | |
| 9.48 Price/1000 | +3.01 Price/1000 | €16.55 | |
| 9.59 Price/1000 | +3.12 Price/1000 | €11.36 | |
| 9.59 Price/1000 | +3.12 Price/1000 | €18.36 | |
| 9.72 Price/1000 | +3.25 Price/1000 | €12.40 | |
| 10.28 Price/1000 | +3.81 Price/1000 | €19.20 | |
| 11.04 Price/1000 | +4.57 Price/1000 | €23.40 | |
| 11.43 Price/1000 | +4.96 Price/1000 | €18.98 | |
| 11.83 Price/1000 | +5.36 Price/1000 | €25.34 | |
| 12.07 Price/1000 | +5.60 Price/1000 | €27.29 | |
| 12.26 Price/1000 | +5.79 Price/1000 | €24.01 |
The difference between best and worst was 89.5% (5.79 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Bridgestone Turanza T005) works out €637 cheaper than the most expensive (Kumho Ecsta PS71).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2019 test; financing costs are excluded.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.49 kg/t | Best | £0 | |
| 7.69 kg/t | +0.20 kg/t | £12 | |
| 8.23 kg/t | +0.74 kg/t | £44 | |
| 8.47 kg/t | +0.98 kg/t | £58 | |
| 8.97 kg/t | +1.48 kg/t | £87 | |
| 8.99 kg/t | +1.50 kg/t | £88 | |
| 9.08 kg/t | +1.59 kg/t | £94 | |
| 9.09 kg/t | +1.60 kg/t | £94 | |
| 9.22 kg/t | +1.73 kg/t | £102 | |
| 9.43 kg/t | +1.94 kg/t | £114 | |
| 9.48 kg/t | +1.99 kg/t | £117 | |
| 9.48 kg/t | +1.99 kg/t | £117 | |
| 9.49 kg/t | +2.00 kg/t | £118 | |
| 9.61 kg/t | +2.12 kg/t | £125 | |
| 9.8 kg/t | +2.31 kg/t | £136 | |
| 10.27 kg/t | +2.78 kg/t | £164 | |
| 10.29 kg/t | +2.80 kg/t | £165 | |
| 10.67 kg/t | +3.18 kg/t | £187 | |
| 11.06 kg/t | +3.57 kg/t | £210 | |
| 11.49 kg/t | +4.00 kg/t | £235 |
The difference between best and worst was 53.4% (4 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti uses about 162 L (£235) more fuel than the Bridgestone Turanza T005.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout
225/45 R1745 tyres tested
20 of these 20 tyres tested again
2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test
245/45 R1849 tyres tested
15 of these 20 tyres tested again
2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
245/45 R1820 tyres tested
13 of these 20 tyres tested again
Continental Premium Contact 6 / Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
This test’s winner finished 3rd there
