Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat
The Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat is a Max Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Car
This tyre has been replaced by the Continental Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flat
Show All
Tyre review data from 6 tyre reviews averaging 80% over 110,000 miles driven.
Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat
Sorry, we don't currently have any label data for the Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question
We will never publish or share your email address
Top Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat Review
Given
51%
while driving a
BMW E91 325i
(225/45 R17 W) on
mostly motorways
for 12,000
easy going miles
This tyre lies in the front of my car, wears very unevenly and generates terribly loud noise. It has rim protection that didn't fully stop my whe els from kissing the curb. It is very old tyres design, even its successor CSC3 is being replaced by CSC5. So luckily I don't have to buy this tyre again.
Latest Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat Reviews
Given
57%
while driving a
BMW 325i M Sport
(225/45 R17) on
mostly motorways
for 15,000
spirited miles
Fitted to E90 M Sport. Front tyres wore uneven and wore out of round resulting it having to be replaced after just 25000km. Rear tyres wore down to limit after 30000km. Tyre has much better grip and comfort than Bridgestone RE050A RFT.
Given
84%
while driving a
BMW 320i Touring
(205/55 R16 W) on
a combination of roads
for 60,000
spirited miles
These tyres lasted about 30,000 miles on my BMW 320. Some criticise the comfort of run flat tyres but car has a very good ride - probably because the tyres are the standard higher profile ones that come on 16 inch wheels as opposed to the more "macho" low profile tyres that feature on higher spec BMW's.
Trying to pick the very best winter tyre? Watch this!
Given
99%
while driving a
BMW 118d M Sport
(225/45 R17 V) on
mostly motorways
for 8,000
average miles
Brilliant tyres very grippy in the dry and excellent in the wet, wearing well too they are down to 7mm after 8k.
Given
51%
while driving a
BMW E91 325i
(225/45 R17 W) on
mostly motorways
for 12,000
easy going miles
This tyre lies in the front of my car, wears very unevenly and generates terribly loud noise. It has rim protection that didn't fully stop my whe els from kissing the curb. It is very old tyres design, even its successor CSC3 is being replaced by CSC5. So luckily I don't have to buy this tyre again.
Given
91%
while driving a
BMW 320D
(225/45 R17) on
mostly country roads
for 5,000
average miles
Having suffered with Bridgestone Potenza Runflats when the car was new I replaced the rears at 16000 miles with these Conti SportContact 2 SSR Runflats and what a fabulous difference. Car now sticks to road like glue, ride comfort very much better and am no longer frightened of driving on wet roads, of which we have too much in west Scotland.
Why don't BMW fit these as original equipment instead of those dreadful Potenza 's?