The 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test reviewed 20 premium touring summer tyres in size 205/55 R16. The test focused on several key performance indicators including dry and wet braking, handling, noise, wear, value, and rolling resistance.

Michelin Primacy 4+ ranked first, demonstrating a balanced performance with short braking distances and high efficiency. Continental PremiumContact 7 and Bridgestone Turanza 6 followed, showing strong wet and dry road performance and low wear levels.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking: 100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking: 100 → 0 km/h

Dry

The Continental PremiumContact 7 and Kumho Ecsta HS52 led dry braking, with the reference budget performing significantly worse.

Dry Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Continental PremiumContact 7	35.4 m	Best	0 km/h
1Kumho Ecsta HS52	35.4 m	Best	0 km/h
3Hankook Ventus Prime 4	35.9 m	+0.50 m	15 km/h
4Vredestein Ultrac	36.1 m	+0.70 m	18 km/h
5Maxxis Premitra HP5	36.2 m	+0.80 m	19 km/h
6Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2	36.3 m	+0.90 m	20 km/h
6Michelin Primacy 4+	36.3 m	+0.90 m	20 km/h
8Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2	36.4 m	+1.00 m	22 km/h
9Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun	36.5 m	+1.10 m	23 km/h
10Firestone RoadHawk	36.6 m	+1.20 m	24 km/h
10Giti GitiSynergyH2	36.6 m	+1.20 m	24 km/h
12Toyo Proxes Comfort	36.7 m	+1.30 m	24 km/h
13Fulda EcoControl HP2	36.8 m	+1.40 m	25 km/h
14Dunlop Sport BluResponse	36.9 m	+1.50 m	26 km/h
14Bridgestone Turanza 6	36.9 m	+1.50 m	26 km/h
16Nexen N Fera Primus	37.2 m	+1.80 m	29 km/h
17GT Radial FE2	37.4 m	+2.00 m	30 km/h
17BFGoodrich Advantage	37.4 m	+2.00 m	30 km/h
17Kleber Dynaxer HP4	37.4 m	+2.00 m	30 km/h
20Uniroyal RainSport 5	37.9 m	+2.50 m	33 km/h
RefReference Budget	39.6 m	+4.20 m	42 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 11.9% (4.2 m ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Uniroyal RainSport 5 would still be travelling at 33 km/h when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The Falken Ziex ZE310 led the way in dry handling with the Vredestein Ultrac close behind.

Dry Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun	116.2 km/h	Best
2Vredestein Ultrac	116.1 km/h	-0.10 km/h
3Kumho Ecsta HS52	116 km/h	-0.20 km/h
3Toyo Proxes Comfort	116 km/h	-0.20 km/h
5Firestone RoadHawk	115.7 km/h	-0.50 km/h
6Hankook Ventus Prime 4	115.6 km/h	-0.60 km/h
7Continental PremiumContact 7	115.5 km/h	-0.70 km/h
8Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2	115.4 km/h	-0.80 km/h
9Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2	115.2 km/h	-1.00 km/h
10Michelin Primacy 4+	115.1 km/h	-1.10 km/h
11BFGoodrich Advantage	114.9 km/h	-1.30 km/h
12Bridgestone Turanza 6	114.7 km/h	-1.50 km/h
13Dunlop Sport BluResponse	114.6 km/h	-1.60 km/h
14GT Radial FE2	114.5 km/h	-1.70 km/h
15Kleber Dynaxer HP4	114.4 km/h	-1.80 km/h
15Nexen N Fera Primus	114.4 km/h	-1.80 km/h
17Giti GitiSynergyH2	114.3 km/h	-1.90 km/h
18Maxxis Premitra HP5	114.1 km/h	-2.10 km/h
19Fulda EcoControl HP2	113.9 km/h	-2.30 km/h
20Uniroyal RainSport 5	113.8 km/h	-2.40 km/h
RefReference Budget	112.9 km/h	-3.30 km/h

All the tyres in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Wet

Continental again led wet braking, this time with a small advantage over Kumho and Vredestein. As in the dry the reference budget tyre was a complete disaster.

Wet Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Continental PremiumContact 7	40.3 m	Best	0 km/h
2Kumho Ecsta HS52	40.8 m	+0.50 m	14 km/h
3Vredestein Ultrac	41.6 m	+1.30 m	23 km/h
4Toyo Proxes Comfort	42.9 m	+2.60 m	32 km/h
5Hankook Ventus Prime 4	43.3 m	+3.00 m	34 km/h
5Michelin Primacy 4+	43.3 m	+3.00 m	34 km/h
5Nexen N Fera Primus	43.3 m	+3.00 m	34 km/h
5Uniroyal RainSport 5	43.3 m	+3.00 m	34 km/h
9Bridgestone Turanza 6	43.6 m	+3.30 m	36 km/h
10Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun	43.7 m	+3.40 m	36 km/h
11Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2	44.4 m	+4.10 m	40 km/h
11Maxxis Premitra HP5	44.4 m	+4.10 m	40 km/h
13Firestone RoadHawk	44.9 m	+4.60 m	42 km/h
14Kleber Dynaxer HP4	45 m	+4.70 m	42 km/h
15BFGoodrich Advantage	45.4 m	+5.10 m	44 km/h
16Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2	45.6 m	+5.30 m	44 km/h
17GT Radial FE2	45.8 m	+5.50 m	45 km/h
18Fulda EcoControl HP2	46.1 m	+5.80 m	46 km/h
19Giti GitiSynergyH2	46.5 m	+6.20 m	47 km/h
20Dunlop Sport BluResponse	46.9 m	+6.60 m	49 km/h
RefReference Budget	52.5 m	+12.20 m	63 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 30.3% (12.2 m ≈ 2.7 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Dunlop Sport BluResponse would still be travelling at 49 km/h when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The Vredestein Ultrac was the fastest around wet handling, with the Kumho again showing well

Wet Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Vredestein Ultrac	76.2 km/h	Best
2Kumho Ecsta HS52	75.7 km/h	-0.50 km/h
3Firestone RoadHawk	75.6 km/h	-0.60 km/h
4Continental PremiumContact 7	75.5 km/h	-0.70 km/h
5Toyo Proxes Comfort	75.4 km/h	-0.80 km/h
6Nexen N Fera Primus	75.3 km/h	-0.90 km/h
7Uniroyal RainSport 5	74.8 km/h	-1.40 km/h
8Bridgestone Turanza 6	74.7 km/h	-1.50 km/h
9Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2	74.6 km/h	-1.60 km/h
10Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun	74.5 km/h	-1.70 km/h
10Giti GitiSynergyH2	74.5 km/h	-1.70 km/h
10Michelin Primacy 4+	74.5 km/h	-1.70 km/h
13Hankook Ventus Prime 4	74.3 km/h	-1.90 km/h
14Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2	74.2 km/h	-2.00 km/h
14GT Radial FE2	74.2 km/h	-2.00 km/h
16Fulda EcoControl HP2	74.1 km/h	-2.10 km/h
17Kleber Dynaxer HP4	73.6 km/h	-2.60 km/h
18BFGoodrich Advantage	73.5 km/h	-2.70 km/h
19Dunlop Sport BluResponse	73.3 km/h	-2.90 km/h
20Maxxis Premitra HP5	73.1 km/h	-3.10 km/h
RefReference Budget	64.7 km/h	-11.50 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 15.1% (11.5 Km/H).

The Vredestein Ultrac was the best in both straight and curved aquaplaning with the Uniroyal Rainsport 5 second in both of the deeper water tests.

Straight Aqua
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Vredestein Ultrac	86.8 km/h	Best
2Uniroyal RainSport 5	85.3 km/h	-1.50 km/h
3Michelin Primacy 4+	85.2 km/h	-1.60 km/h
4Firestone RoadHawk	84.7 km/h	-2.10 km/h
5Bridgestone Turanza 6	84.5 km/h	-2.30 km/h
6Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun	83.4 km/h	-3.40 km/h
7Dunlop Sport BluResponse	83.2 km/h	-3.60 km/h
8Kleber Dynaxer HP4	82.8 km/h	-4.00 km/h
9Continental PremiumContact 7	82.5 km/h	-4.30 km/h
10Kumho Ecsta HS52	82.4 km/h	-4.40 km/h
11Toyo Proxes Comfort	81.9 km/h	-4.90 km/h
12GT Radial FE2	81.7 km/h	-5.10 km/h
13BFGoodrich Advantage	81.4 km/h	-5.40 km/h
14Giti GitiSynergyH2	81.3 km/h	-5.50 km/h
14Hankook Ventus Prime 4	81.3 km/h	-5.50 km/h
14Maxxis Premitra HP5	81.3 km/h	-5.50 km/h
RefReference Budget	81.2 km/h	-5.60 km/h
17Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2	81.1 km/h	-5.70 km/h
18Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2	81 km/h	-5.80 km/h
19Fulda EcoControl HP2	80.6 km/h	-6.20 km/h
20Nexen N Fera Primus	80.2 km/h	-6.60 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 7.6% (6.6 Km/H).

Curved Aquaplaning
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Vredestein Ultrac	5.12 m/sec2	Best
2Uniroyal RainSport 5	5 m/sec2	-0.12 m/sec2
3Fulda EcoControl HP2	4.82 m/sec2	-0.30 m/sec2
4Michelin Primacy 4+	4.79 m/sec2	-0.33 m/sec2
5Dunlop Sport BluResponse	4.77 m/sec2	-0.35 m/sec2
5Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun	4.77 m/sec2	-0.35 m/sec2
7Maxxis Premitra HP5	4.74 m/sec2	-0.38 m/sec2
8Firestone RoadHawk	4.72 m/sec2	-0.40 m/sec2
9BFGoodrich Advantage	4.66 m/sec2	-0.46 m/sec2
9Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2	4.66 m/sec2	-0.46 m/sec2
11Toyo Proxes Comfort	4.51 m/sec2	-0.61 m/sec2
11Continental PremiumContact 7	4.51 m/sec2	-0.61 m/sec2
13Kleber Dynaxer HP4	4.5 m/sec2	-0.62 m/sec2
14Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2	4.49 m/sec2	-0.63 m/sec2
15Giti GitiSynergyH2	4.47 m/sec2	-0.65 m/sec2
16GT Radial FE2	4.45 m/sec2	-0.67 m/sec2
17Nexen N Fera Primus	4.43 m/sec2	-0.69 m/sec2
18Hankook Ventus Prime 4	4.38 m/sec2	-0.74 m/sec2
19Bridgestone Turanza 6	4.26 m/sec2	-0.86 m/sec2
RefReference Budget	4.21 m/sec2	-0.91 m/sec2
20Kumho Ecsta HS52	4.18 m/sec2	-0.94 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 18.4% (0.94 m/sec2).

Comfort

The Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 had the lowest external noise.

Noise
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2	72.3 dB	Best
2Fulda EcoControl HP2	72.5 dB	+0.20 dB
3Michelin Primacy 4+	72.7 dB	+0.40 dB
4Kleber Dynaxer HP4	72.9 dB	+0.60 dB
4Uniroyal RainSport 5	72.9 dB	+0.60 dB
6Toyo Proxes Comfort	73 dB	+0.70 dB
7Kumho Ecsta HS52	73.1 dB	+0.80 dB
8Nexen N Fera Primus	73.2 dB	+0.90 dB
9Hankook Ventus Prime 4	73.3 dB	+1.00 dB
9BFGoodrich Advantage	73.3 dB	+1.00 dB
11Vredestein Ultrac	73.6 dB	+1.30 dB
11Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2	73.6 dB	+1.30 dB
13Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun	73.7 dB	+1.40 dB
14Dunlop Sport BluResponse	73.8 dB	+1.50 dB
15GT Radial FE2	73.9 dB	+1.60 dB
16Bridgestone Turanza 6	74.1 dB	+1.80 dB
16Continental PremiumContact 7	74.1 dB	+1.80 dB
18Maxxis Premitra HP5	74.2 dB	+1.90 dB
RefReference Budget	74.3 dB	+2.00 dB
19Giti GitiSynergyH2	74.4 dB	+2.10 dB
20Firestone RoadHawk	74.5 dB	+2.20 dB

All the tyres in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Value

The Goodyear also proved to have the best tread life on test, significantly ahead of Fulda, Michelin and Bridgestone.

Wear
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2	45,250 KM	Best
2Fulda EcoControl HP2	40,300 KM	-4,950 KM
3Michelin Primacy 4+	38,950 KM	-6,300 KM
4Bridgestone Turanza 6	34,400 KM	-10,850 KM
5Continental PremiumContact 7	30,750 KM	-14,500 KM
6Firestone RoadHawk	29,850 KM	-15,400 KM
7Maxxis Premitra HP5	29,450 KM	-15,800 KM
7GT Radial FE2	29,450 KM	-15,800 KM
9Giti GitiSynergyH2	29,400 KM	-15,850 KM
10Uniroyal RainSport 5	27,650 KM	-17,600 KM
11Dunlop Sport BluResponse	27,600 KM	-17,650 KM
12Kumho Ecsta HS52	27,150 KM	-18,100 KM
13Hankook Ventus Prime 4	26,250 KM	-19,000 KM
14Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun	25,800 KM	-19,450 KM
15BFGoodrich Advantage	25,750 KM	-19,500 KM
16Kleber Dynaxer HP4	25,350 KM	-19,900 KM
17Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2	24,900 KM	-20,350 KM
18Toyo Proxes Comfort	24,450 KM	-20,800 KM
19Nexen N Fera Primus	19,450 KM	-25,800 KM
20Vredestein Ultrac	15,400 KM	-29,850 KM

The difference between best and worst was 66% (29,850 KM).

When you compare the cost of the tyre against the projected tread life the Fulda and Goodyear proved to be the best value, with the Fulda being the only tyre under 8 Euros per 1000/km. The Vredestein was over twice as expensive thanks to very low wear.

Value
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	cost per 1,000 km
1Fulda EcoControl HP2	7.44 Price/1000	Best	€11.12
2Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2	8.29 Price/1000	+0.85 Price/1000	€10.33
3GT Radial FE2	9 Price/1000	+1.56 Price/1000	€14.73
4Maxxis Premitra HP5	9.85 Price/1000	+2.41 Price/1000	€16.99
5Kumho Ecsta HS52	9.94 Price/1000	+2.50 Price/1000	€15.98
6Giti GitiSynergyH2	10.03 Price/1000	+2.59 Price/1000	€18.45
7Firestone RoadHawk	10.05 Price/1000	+2.61 Price/1000	€13.07
8Uniroyal RainSport 5	10.85 Price/1000	+3.41 Price/1000	€14.97
9Michelin Primacy 4+	11.3 Price/1000	+3.86 Price/1000	€15.49
10Hankook Ventus Prime 4	11.43 Price/1000	+3.99 Price/1000	€14.70
11BFGoodrich Advantage	11.46 Price/1000	+4.02 Price/1000	€15.06
12Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun	11.63 Price/1000	+4.19 Price/1000	€16.95
13Kleber Dynaxer HP4	11.64 Price/1000	+4.20 Price/1000	€15.53
14Bridgestone Turanza 6	11.77 Price/1000	+4.33 Price/1000	€15.57
15Toyo Proxes Comfort	12.07 Price/1000	+4.63 Price/1000	€21.03
16Dunlop Sport BluResponse	12.32 Price/1000	+4.88 Price/1000	€14.86
17Continental PremiumContact 7	12.85 Price/1000	+5.41 Price/1000	€17.24
18Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2	14.46 Price/1000	+7.02 Price/1000	€20.37
19Nexen N Fera Primus	14.91 Price/1000	+7.47 Price/1000	€22.46
20Vredestein Ultrac	19.81 Price/1000	+12.37 Price/1000	€29.04

The difference between best and worst was 166.3% (12.37 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2) works out €749 cheaper than the most expensive (Vredestein Ultrac).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2024 test; financing costs are excluded.

The Dunlop Sport BluResponse got its first win with the lowest rolling resistance, narrowly ahead of its sister brand, Goodyear.

Rolling Resistance
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Extra fuel / year
1Dunlop Sport BluResponse	7.48 kg/t	Best	£0
2Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2	7.62 kg/t	+0.14 kg/t	£8
3Hankook Ventus Prime 4	7.65 kg/t	+0.17 kg/t	£10
4Firestone RoadHawk	7.67 kg/t	+0.19 kg/t	£11
5BFGoodrich Advantage	7.73 kg/t	+0.25 kg/t	£15
6Kleber Dynaxer HP4	7.8 kg/t	+0.32 kg/t	£19
7Uniroyal RainSport 5	7.93 kg/t	+0.45 kg/t	£27
8Bridgestone Turanza 6	7.98 kg/t	+0.50 kg/t	£29
9Fulda EcoControl HP2	8.03 kg/t	+0.55 kg/t	£32
10Toyo Proxes Comfort	8.05 kg/t	+0.57 kg/t	£34
11Continental PremiumContact 7	8.08 kg/t	+0.60 kg/t	£35
12Michelin Primacy 4+	8.16 kg/t	+0.68 kg/t	£40
13Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun	8.22 kg/t	+0.74 kg/t	£44
14Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2	8.36 kg/t	+0.88 kg/t	£52
15GT Radial FE2	8.43 kg/t	+0.95 kg/t	£56
16Kumho Ecsta HS52	8.46 kg/t	+0.98 kg/t	£58
17Nexen N Fera Primus	8.6 kg/t	+1.12 kg/t	£66
18Vredestein Ultrac	8.81 kg/t	+1.33 kg/t	£78
19Maxxis Premitra HP5	8.83 kg/t	+1.35 kg/t	£80
RefReference Budget	8.95 kg/t	+1.47 kg/t	£87
20Giti GitiSynergyH2	9.19 kg/t	+1.71 kg/t	£101

The difference between best and worst was 22.9% (1.71 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Giti GitiSynergyH2 uses about 69 L (£101) more fuel than the Dunlop Sport BluResponse.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

Petrol/Diesel Electric

Annual Mileage

19,000 km

km (L)

miles (US gal)

Fuel Price

£1.45/L

GBP (£)

EUR (€)

USD ($)

Set my vehicle consumption

Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Results

Exemplary.

Dry98.3%

Wet95.4%

Comfort99.5%

Value82.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	6^th / 20	36.3 m	+0.90 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 20	115.1 km/h	-1.10 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	5^th / 20	43.3 m	+3.00 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 20	74.5 km/h	-1.70 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	8^th / 20	6.24 m/s	-0.32 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	3^rd / 20	85.2 km/h	-1.60 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	4^th / 20	4.79 m/sec2	-0.33 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	3^rd / 20	72.7 dB	+0.40 dB
WearHigher is better	3^rd / 20	38950 KM	-6,300.00 KM
ValueLower is better	9^th / 20	11.3 Price/1000	+3.86 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	12^th / 20	8.16 kg/t	+0.68 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/69
Price: 440.00

Exemplary.

Dry99.7%

Wet97.8%

Comfort97.6%

Value74.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	1^st / 20	35.4 m	Best in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 20	115.5 km/h	-0.70 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	1^st / 20	40.3 m	Best in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 20	75.5 km/h	-0.70 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	2^nd / 20	6.53 m/s	-0.03 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	9^th / 20	82.5 km/h	-4.30 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	11^th / 20	4.51 m/sec2	-0.61 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	16^th / 20	74.1 dB	+1.80 dB
WearHigher is better	5^th / 20	30750 KM	-14,500.00 KM
ValueLower is better	17^th / 20	12.85 Price/1000	+5.41 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	11^th / 20	8.08 kg/t	+0.60 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/71
Price: 395.00

Exemplary.

Dry97.3%

Wet94.3%

Comfort97.6%

Value78.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	14^th / 20	36.9 m	+1.50 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	12^th / 20	114.7 km/h	-1.50 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	9^th / 20	43.6 m	+3.30 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 20	74.7 km/h	-1.50 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	5^th / 20	6.29 m/s	-0.27 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	5^th / 20	84.5 km/h	-2.30 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	19^th / 20	4.26 m/sec2	-0.86 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	16^th / 20	74.1 dB	+1.80 dB
WearHigher is better	4^th / 20	34400 KM	-10,850.00 KM
ValueLower is better	14^th / 20	11.77 Price/1000	+4.33 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	8^th / 20	7.98 kg/t	+0.50 kg/t

EU Label: B/A/69
Price: 405.00

Good.

Dry98.2%

Wet91.7%

Comfort100%

Value96.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	8^th / 20	36.4 m	+1.00 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 20	115.2 km/h	-1.00 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	16^th / 20	45.6 m	+5.30 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	14^th / 20	74.2 km/h	-2.00 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	17^th / 20	5.92 m/s	-0.64 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	18^th / 20	81 km/h	-5.80 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	14^th / 20	4.49 m/sec2	-0.63 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	1^st / 20	72.3 dB	Best in this discipline
WearHigher is better	1^st / 20	45250 KM	Best in this discipline
ValueLower is better	2^nd / 20	8.29 Price/1000	+0.85 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	2^nd / 20	7.62 kg/t	+0.14 kg/t

EU Label: B/A/69
Price: 375.00

Good.

Dry99.9%

Wet95.8%

Comfort98.9%

Value74.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	1^st / 20	35.4 m	Best in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 20	116 km/h	-0.20 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 20	40.8 m	+0.50 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 20	75.7 km/h	-0.50 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	6^th / 20	6.27 m/s	-0.29 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	10^th / 20	82.4 km/h	-4.40 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	20^th / 20	4.18 m/sec2	-0.94 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	7^th / 20	73.1 dB	+0.80 dB
WearHigher is better	12^th / 20	27150 KM	-18,100.00 KM
ValueLower is better	5^th / 20	9.94 Price/1000	+2.50 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	16^th / 20	8.46 kg/t	+0.98 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/71
Price: 270.00

Good.

Dry98.1%

Wet94.6%

Comfort97.1%

Value79.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	10^th / 20	36.6 m	+1.20 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 20	115.7 km/h	-0.50 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	13^th / 20	44.9 m	+4.60 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 20	75.6 km/h	-0.60 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	9^th / 20	6.21 m/s	-0.35 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	4^th / 20	84.7 km/h	-2.10 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	8^th / 20	4.72 m/sec2	-0.40 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	20^th / 20	74.5 dB	+2.20 dB
WearHigher is better	6^th / 20	29850 KM	-15,400.00 KM
ValueLower is better	7^th / 20	10.05 Price/1000	+2.61 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	4^th / 20	7.67 kg/t	+0.19 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/70
Price: 300.00

Good.

Dry98.5%

Wet94.5%

Comfort98.1%

Value71.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	9^th / 20	36.5 m	+1.10 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 20	116.2 km/h	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	10^th / 20	43.7 m	+3.40 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 20	74.5 km/h	-1.70 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	10^th / 20	6.13 m/s	-0.43 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	6^th / 20	83.4 km/h	-3.40 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	5^th / 20	4.77 m/sec2	-0.35 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	13^th / 20	73.7 dB	+1.40 dB
WearHigher is better	14^th / 20	25800 KM	-19,450.00 KM
ValueLower is better	12^th / 20	11.63 Price/1000	+4.19 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	13^th / 20	8.22 kg/t	+0.74 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/67
Price: 300.00

Good.

Dry99%

Wet93.3%

Comfort98.6%

Value74.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 20	35.9 m	+0.50 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 20	115.6 km/h	-0.60 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	5^th / 20	43.3 m	+3.00 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	13^th / 20	74.3 km/h	-1.90 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	14^th / 20	6.06 m/s	-0.50 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	14^th / 20	81.3 km/h	-5.50 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	18^th / 20	4.38 m/sec2	-0.74 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	9^th / 20	73.3 dB	+1.00 dB
WearHigher is better	13^th / 20	26250 KM	-19,000.00 KM
ValueLower is better	10^th / 20	11.43 Price/1000	+3.99 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	3^rd / 20	7.65 kg/t	+0.17 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/69
Price: 300.00

Good.

Dry98.1%

Wet95.6%

Comfort99%

Value70.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	12^th / 20	36.7 m	+1.30 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 20	116 km/h	-0.20 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	4^th / 20	42.9 m	+2.60 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 20	75.4 km/h	-0.80 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	3^rd / 20	6.4 m/s	-0.16 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	11^th / 20	81.9 km/h	-4.90 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	11^th / 20	4.51 m/sec2	-0.61 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	6^th / 20	73 dB	+0.70 dB
WearHigher is better	18^th / 20	24450 KM	-20,800.00 KM
ValueLower is better	15^th / 20	12.07 Price/1000	+4.63 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	10^th / 20	8.05 kg/t	+0.57 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/70
Price: 395.00

Good.

Dry97.1%

Wet92.8%

Comfort99.7%

Value93.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	13^th / 20	36.8 m	+1.40 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	19^th / 20	113.9 km/h	-2.30 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	18^th / 20	46.1 m	+5.80 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	16^th / 20	74.1 km/h	-2.10 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	11^th / 20	6.1 m/s	-0.46 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	19^th / 20	80.6 km/h	-6.20 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	3^rd / 20	4.82 m/sec2	-0.30 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	2^nd / 20	72.5 dB	+0.20 dB
WearHigher is better	2^nd / 20	40300 KM	-4,950.00 KM
ValueLower is better	1^st / 20	7.44 Price/1000	Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	9^th / 20	8.03 kg/t	+0.55 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/70
Price: 300.00

Good.

Dry97.3%

Wet91.6%

Comfort98%

Value74.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	14^th / 20	36.9 m	+1.50 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	13^th / 20	114.6 km/h	-1.60 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	20^th / 20	46.9 m	+6.60 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	19^th / 20	73.3 km/h	-2.90 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	17^th / 20	5.92 m/s	-0.64 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	7^th / 20	83.2 km/h	-3.60 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	5^th / 20	4.77 m/sec2	-0.35 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	14^th / 20	73.8 dB	+1.50 dB
WearHigher is better	11^th / 20	27600 KM	-17,650.00 KM
ValueLower is better	16^th / 20	12.32 Price/1000	+4.88 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	1^st / 20	7.48 kg/t	Best in this discipline

EU Label: B/C/71
Price: 340.00

Good.

Dry96.8%

Wet91.7%

Comfort98.6%

Value73.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	17^th / 20	37.4 m	+2.00 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	11^th / 20	114.9 km/h	-1.30 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	15^th / 20	45.4 m	+5.10 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	18^th / 20	73.5 km/h	-2.70 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	19^th / 20	5.86 m/s	-0.70 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	13^th / 20	81.4 km/h	-5.40 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	9^th / 20	4.66 m/sec2	-0.46 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	9^th / 20	73.3 dB	+1.00 dB
WearHigher is better	15^th / 20	25750 KM	-19,500.00 KM
ValueLower is better	11^th / 20	11.46 Price/1000	+4.02 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	5^th / 20	7.73 kg/t	+0.25 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/70
Price: 295.00

Good.

Dry96.6%

Wet92.5%

Comfort99.2%

Value72.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	17^th / 20	37.4 m	+2.00 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	15^th / 20	114.4 km/h	-1.80 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	14^th / 20	45 m	+4.70 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	17^th / 20	73.6 km/h	-2.60 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	15^th / 20	6.04 m/s	-0.52 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	8^th / 20	82.8 km/h	-4.00 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	13^th / 20	4.5 m/sec2	-0.62 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	4^th / 20	72.9 dB	+0.60 dB
WearHigher is better	16^th / 20	25350 KM	-19,900.00 KM
ValueLower is better	13^th / 20	11.64 Price/1000	+4.20 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	6^th / 20	7.8 kg/t	+0.32 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/70
Price: 295.00

Good.

Dry96.6%

Wet91.9%

Comfort97.8%

Value78.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	17^th / 20	37.4 m	+2.00 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	14^th / 20	114.5 km/h	-1.70 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	17^th / 20	45.8 m	+5.50 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	14^th / 20	74.2 km/h	-2.00 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	16^th / 20	6.01 m/s	-0.55 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	12^th / 20	81.7 km/h	-5.10 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	16^th / 20	4.45 m/sec2	-0.67 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	15^th / 20	73.9 dB	+1.60 dB
WearHigher is better	7^th / 20	29450 KM	-15,800.00 KM
ValueLower is better	3^rd / 20	9 Price/1000	+1.56 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	15^th / 20	8.43 kg/t	+0.95 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/69
Price: 265.00

Good.

Dry97.5%

Wet92%

Comfort97.2%

Value73.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	10^th / 20	36.6 m	+1.20 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	17^th / 20	114.3 km/h	-1.90 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	19^th / 20	46.5 m	+6.20 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 20	74.5 km/h	-1.70 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	12^th / 20	6.09 m/s	-0.47 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	14^th / 20	81.3 km/h	-5.50 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	15^th / 20	4.47 m/sec2	-0.65 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	19^th / 20	74.4 dB	+2.10 dB
WearHigher is better	9^th / 20	29400 KM	-15,850.00 KM
ValueLower is better	6^th / 20	10.03 Price/1000	+2.59 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	20^th / 20	9.19 kg/t	+1.71 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/71
Price: 295.00

Satisfactory.

Dry98.4%

Wet93.4%

Comfort98.2%

Value66.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	6^th / 20	36.3 m	+0.90 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 20	115.4 km/h	-0.80 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	11^th / 20	44.4 m	+4.10 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 20	74.6 km/h	-1.60 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	13^th / 20	6.08 m/s	-0.48 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	17^th / 20	81.1 km/h	-5.70 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	9^th / 20	4.66 m/sec2	-0.46 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	11^th / 20	73.6 dB	+1.30 dB
WearHigher is better	17^th / 20	24900 KM	-20,350.00 KM
ValueLower is better	18^th / 20	14.46 Price/1000	+7.02 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	14^th / 20	8.36 kg/t	+0.88 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/69
Price: 360.00

Satisfactory.

Dry96.8%

Wet94.4%

Comfort98.8%

Value60.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	16^th / 20	37.2 m	+1.80 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	15^th / 20	114.4 km/h	-1.80 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	5^th / 20	43.3 m	+3.00 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 20	75.3 km/h	-0.90 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	6^th / 20	6.27 m/s	-0.29 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	20^th / 20	80.2 km/h	-6.60 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	17^th / 20	4.43 m/sec2	-0.69 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	8^th / 20	73.2 dB	+0.90 dB
WearHigher is better	19^th / 20	19450 KM	-25,800.00 KM
ValueLower is better	19^th / 20	14.91 Price/1000	+7.47 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	17^th / 20	8.6 kg/t	+1.12 kg/t

EU Label: D/A/71
Price: 290.00

Satisfactory.

Dry95.7%

Wet96.4%

Comfort99.2%

Value75.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	20^th / 20	37.9 m	+2.50 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	20^th / 20	113.8 km/h	-2.40 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	5^th / 20	43.3 m	+3.00 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 20	74.8 km/h	-1.40 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	4^th / 20	6.34 m/s	-0.22 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	2^nd / 20	85.3 km/h	-1.50 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	2^nd / 20	5 m/sec2	-0.12 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	4^th / 20	72.9 dB	+0.60 dB
WearHigher is better	10^th / 20	27650 KM	-17,600.00 KM
ValueLower is better	8^th / 20	10.85 Price/1000	+3.41 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	7^th / 20	7.93 kg/t	+0.45 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/71
Price: 300.00

Satisfactory.

Dry98%

Wet91.5%

Comfort97.4%

Value75%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	5^th / 20	36.2 m	+0.80 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	18^th / 20	114.1 km/h	-2.10 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	11^th / 20	44.4 m	+4.10 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	20^th / 20	73.1 km/h	-3.10 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	20^th / 20	5.68 m/s	-0.88 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	14^th / 20	81.3 km/h	-5.50 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	7^th / 20	4.74 m/sec2	-0.38 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	18^th / 20	74.2 dB	+1.90 dB
WearHigher is better	7^th / 20	29450 KM	-15,800.00 KM
ValueLower is better	4^th / 20	9.85 Price/1000	+2.41 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	19^th / 20	8.83 kg/t	+1.35 kg/t

EU Label: D/A/70
Price: 290.00

Conditionally Recommended.

Dry99%

Wet99.2%

Comfort98.2%

Value53.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4^th / 20	36.1 m	+0.70 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 20	116.1 km/h	-0.10 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 20	41.6 m	+1.30 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 20	76.2 km/h	Best in this discipline
Wet CircleHigher is better	1^st / 20	6.56 m/s	Best in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better	1^st / 20	86.8 km/h	Best in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	1^st / 20	5.12 m/sec2	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	11^th / 20	73.6 dB	+1.30 dB
WearHigher is better	20^th / 20	15400 KM	-29,850.00 KM
ValueLower is better	20^th / 20	19.81 Price/1000	+12.37 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	18^th / 20	8.81 kg/t	+1.33 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/69
Price: 305.00

Discussion

8 comments

Bogdan Gherasim Aug 19, 2024 archived

I had the Goodyears (215/50.R17) on my 2017 Focus Tdci for 4 years and 85.000km without rotating them and they are still going strong. Can't rotate them because one of the rears had a puncture.
The originals Michelin Primacy HP had to go after 80K and I had to rotate them at about 60.000km and they were BAD when they had about 40.000km. Rear grip non existent and on wet they were very tail happy.
P.S. I live in SE of Spain were is HOT in the summer(40+ C), we get more than 300 days of sun, mild winters and it rains....almost never.

#9623
1. TyreReviews Bogdan Gherasim Aug 22, 2024 archived
  
  wow that's strong mileage
  
  #9630
_ _ Apr 15, 2024 archived

Clearly the winner is Vredestein Ultrac..
I hate those manipulations in score.

#9483
1. drtowers _ _ Jul 22, 2024 archived
  
  let down apparently by wear...
  
  #9577
  1. Flaviu drtowers Mar 15, 2025 archived
    
    The new Ultrac + is here. No reviews for it but it appears to have up to 30% better wear and abrasion resistance plus a new build. I think I'm going to be one of the first buying this in the UK.
    
    #10018
    1. TyreReviews Flaviu Mar 19, 2025 archived
      
      Let us know how you like it!
      
      #10024
2. Bogdan Gherasim _ _ Aug 22, 2024 archived
  
  Excellent tyre for a wet climate.
  
  #9632
3. dufonrafal . _ _ Apr 15, 2025 archived
  
  The Vredestein Longevity is abismal sadly.
  Using my own scoring 1/2 wet, 1/3 dry, 1/6 value. And with custom subvalues I had :
  1- P4+ & EGP2
  3- PC7
  4- Fulda EC2 (surprising but looks like he deserve it !)
  5- Turanza 6
  Then it's a mix of second tier tyres, including Hankook who is still behind in longevity. The P7 C2 is among them, bad longevity, hope that the C3 is much better.
  
  #10066

Tyre	Michelin Primacy 4+	Continental PremiumContact 7	Bridgestone Turanza 6	Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2	Kumho Ecsta HS52	Firestone RoadHawk	Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun	Hankook Ventus Prime 4	Toyo Proxes Comfort	Dunlop Sport BluResponse	Fulda EcoControl HP2	BFGoodrich Advantage	Kleber Dynaxer HP4	Giti GitiSynergyH2	GT Radial FE2	Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2	Nexen N Fera Primus	Uniroyal RainSport 5	Maxxis Premitra HP5	Vredestein Ultrac
Position	1^st	2^nd	3^rd	Joint 4^th	Joint 4^th	6^th	Joint 7^th	Joint 7^th	Joint 7^th	Joint 10^th	Joint 10^th	Joint 12^th	Joint 12^th	Joint 14^th	Joint 14^th	16^th	17^th	18^th	19^th	20^th
Category scores (% of best)
Dry	98.3%	99.7%	97.3%	98.2%	99.9%	98.1%	98.5%	99%	98.1%	97.3%	97.1%	96.8%	96.6%	97.5%	96.6%	98.4%	96.8%	95.7%	98%	99%
Wet	95.4%	97.8%	94.3%	91.7%	95.8%	94.6%	94.5%	93.3%	95.6%	91.6%	92.8%	91.7%	92.5%	92%	91.9%	93.4%	94.4%	96.4%	91.5%	99.2%
Comfort	99.5%	97.6%	97.6%	100%	98.9%	97.1%	98.1%	98.6%	99%	98%	99.7%	98.6%	99.2%	97.2%	97.8%	98.2%	98.8%	99.2%	97.4%	98.2%
Value	82.6%	74.1%	78.9%	96.6%	74.2%	79.5%	71.1%	74.2%	70.1%	74.9%	93.5%	73.4%	72.5%	73.4%	78.3%	66.5%	60.7%	75.1%	75%	53.3%
Keep researching	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results

Menu

Tyre shortlist

The evidence behind the verdict

Test setup & methodology

Recorded test conditions

Dry

Wet

Comfort

Value

Results

Cross-check this test