Menu
Pirelli Eufori View Gallery (1)

Pirelli Eufori

Pirelli Tyres Ultra High Performance Summer

The Pirelli Eufori is a Ultra High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

5.6
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
79%
Wet Grip
59%
Road Feedback
68%
Handling
66%
Wear
54%
Comfort
39%
Buy again
42%
10 Reviews
58% Average
100,000 miles driven
Pirelli Eufori

Pirelli Eufori

Summer Premium
BETA
5.6 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 10
Avg Rating: 58.2%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 1.71
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Pirelli Eufori

Questions and Answers for the Pirelli Eufori

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Pirelli Eufori. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Pirelli Eufori Reviews

Given 53% while driving a MINI Cooper S (205/45 R17 H) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
I have just a limited experience on runflat Eufori@, but they are not really the best tyres I've had so far. Maybe due to the runflat construction, I have no experience of other runflats, but they are very uncomfortable and don't grip very well. I'm afraid of the wear also as I see some creases on the outer of the rolling band. Will probably switch for high performance non runflat in the future.
Ask a question | Helpful 518
January 21, 2015
Given 93% while driving a BMW 118d M Sport (225/45 R17 V) on mostly motorways for 18,000 average miles
Found these to be a good tyre and thy were RFT, good grip in the wet and dry.
Ask a question | Helpful 510
March 24, 2013
Given 59% while driving a MINI Cooper (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 15,000 average miles
Very good when new. Better grip than the stock contisports but seem to wear much quicker! My fronts are pretty much done at 15000 miles! Rears are still like new. Tram lining seems to have got ten times worse in the last few months, putting it down to wear. Wouldn't buy again at the price.
Ask a question | Helpful 522
March 17, 2012
Have you driven on the Pirelli Eufori tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Pirelli Eufori? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Pirelli Eufori >

Latest Pirelli Eufori Reviews

Given 53% while driving a MINI Cooper (205/45 R17 V) on mostly town for 10,000 spirited miles
A Mini Cooper on runflats... never again. My recommendation - go to 215/45 r17s non-runflat ASAP to get off these tyres, join the AA and carry a mobile phone! Atleast you can feel when they slowly let go but the ride quality is shocking and they seem to have perished before wearing out!?
Ask a question | Helpful 438
September 25, 2012
Given 47% while driving a MINI Cooper (205/45 R17 V) on mostly country roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Had never experienced run-flats before, never want to again! Terrible over any kind of cracked or pot-holed road, with tram-lining that beggars belief. I have run Goodyear F1 GSD3s on my Focus for the same time that these have been on the Mini and the difference is vast. The Pirellis gripped fine when new, but when worn were just awful. I wouldn't recommend these to anyone.
Ask a question | Helpful 488
March 11, 2011
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 75% while driving a Volkswagen Passat 1.9Tdi (205/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 4,000 spirited miles
Had been running my Passat on cheap sunew tyres ( never again ) as it's a diesel motor it's quite heavy on the front end and the Pirelli's have made me enjoy driving again, it now holds corners so much better than before and on the twisty roads it's much safer than before, also no tramlining unlike the cheap chinese crap I had on before, too early to comment on tyre wear but confident that I wont slide off the road now. You get what you pay for!
Ask a question | Helpful 473
August 1, 2010
Given 39% while driving a BMW 120d (205/50 R17 V) on mostly country roads for 13,000 average miles
This is the second time I have fitted these tyres to the M Sport version. I was disappointed with the tyre wear on the first set (12000 miles) but put it down to incorrectly set tracking. The second set have lasted 14000 miles but show signs of wear on the inner and outer edges although the middle section still have plenty of tread. BMW have checked the steering geometry and all appears to be OK
Tram-lining and road noise is dreadful, so i will be looking to find another brand of RFT. Any suggestions !
Ask a question | Helpful 463
May 11, 2010
Given 39% while driving a MINI Cooper S (205/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 9,000 spirited miles
did not like these at all.wheel spin and tramlining,(even the wife complained).harsh ride and scittery in the wet. changed to falken 452,car feels far safer in all conditions...
Ask a question | Helpful 409
January 26, 2010
Given 63% while driving a MINI Cooper S (205/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
Like all runflats these tyres have very little give resulting in a bone shaking ride on 17" rims. Tramlining was appalling and they were not very good in the wetand extremely noisy on certain types of road surface. Fronts were worn out by 12,000 miles and that was with average driving style. HAve changed to goodyear excellance, they don't tramline, are quieter and much more comfortable.
Ask a question | Helpful 514
December 4, 2008
Given 66% while driving a MINI Cooper S (205/45 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 20,000 spirited miles
Initially the Pirellis' were quite grippy and even in the wet they would hold the road. Once they start to wear they do lose their grip, even before the tyres should need replacing the grip at the front end was worryingly low. I replaced the full set 20k miles ago and the front need replacing but the rears look almost like new.

The main reason I would consider something else rather than buying these again would be the massive tramlining you get on motorways.
Ask a question | Helpful 501
April 28, 2008