Menu
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV View Gallery (3)
205-255/40-60 R17-20 19 sizes 2022 Winter rated

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV features innovative materials and design to increase performance. The tire uses fourth-generation polymers and "smart" technology for improved grip and low rolling resistance on wet surfaces. It has an optimized blend of silica. Its lighter structure, achieved through thinner side walls, lower apex and lighter belt material, reduces energy consumption. The tire also incorporates EV-specific design features such as longitudinal grooves with steeper sides and an asymmetrical shoulder design to improve handling and resist deformation under higher cornering loads.

6.9
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests
Medium Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
95%
Wet Grip
90%
Road Feedback
100%
Handling
95%
Wear
50%
Comfort
95%
Buy again
40%
2 Reviews
81% Average
17,100 miles driven
2 Tests (avg: 4th)
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

All Season Mid-Range
BETA
6.9 / 10
Based on Professional Tests · Medium Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Dry
53.5
1.5x / 3 tests
Wet
44.4
1.93x / 7 tests
Snow
40
1.38x / 6 tests
Value
40
0.42x / 1 test

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
44.6
6 tests
Handling
43.8
4 tests
Traction
40
2 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 2
Publications: 2
Period: 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 2
Avg Rating: 80.7%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.71
History Points: 9
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 Autobild EV All Season Mini-Test Auto Bild 2025 245/45 R19 3/3 10 metrics
2025 TUV Hankook iON FlexClimate EV Report TUV 2025 235/45 R18 5/5 7 metrics
2
Tests
4th
Average
3rd
Best
5th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
The Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV showed one area of notable strength but was otherwise characterized by significant trade-offs, especially in snow and wet braking. Its best performance was in lateral wet grip, where it achieved an excellent score of 97.8%. This was overshadowed by its struggles in winter conditions, where it posted the group's lowest scores in snow acceleration (84.2%), snow braking (81.6%), and snow handling (89.6%). Furthermore, it recorded the lowest scores for wet braking (83.4%) and aquaplaning resistance (89.4%).
3rd/3
The Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV finishes third with an overall grade of 2.8 ("satisfactory"), positioning itself as a comfort-oriented option with some notable limitations. This tyre delivers good and safe driving characteristics on both dry and wet surfaces, providing reliable performance in fair weather conditions. It excels in comfort aspects, offering excellent ride quality and operating quietly, which enhances the driving experience. The tyre also features low rolling resistance, contributing to energy efficiency for electric vehicles. However, its significant weakness lies in snow and ice performance, where it falls considerably short of the competition. This makes it less suitable for drivers who regularly encounter winter conditions. The Quatrac Pro EV is best suited for drivers in milder climates who prioritize comfort and quiet operation over winter performance, representing a viable option for those who rarely face snowy conditions.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
17 inch
205/45 R 17 88 W XL C B 70
205/55 R 17 95 W XL B B 70
215/55 R 17 98 W XL B B 70
225/45 R 17 94 W XL C B 70
225/50 R 17 98 W XL B B 70
18 inch
235/45 R 18 98 W XL B B 70
215/55 R 18 99 V XL B B 70
225/55 R 18 102 V XL B B 70
235/60 R 18 107 V XL B B 70
19 inch
235/55 R 19 105 V XL B B 70
245/45 R 19 102 W XL C B 70
255/50 R 19 107 V XL B B 71
255/55 R 19 111 V XL B B 71
235/40 R 19 96 W XL C B 70
235/50 R 19 103 W XL B B 70
255/45 R 19 104 W XL B B 71
20 inch
235/50 R 20 104 V XL B B 70
255/45 R 20 105 V XL B B 71
255/40 R 20 104 Y XL C B 71
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV >>

Questions and Answers for the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

How would you rate the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV Reviews

Given 84% while driving a Volkswagen ID.7 (255/45 R19) on a combination of roads for 17,000 easy going miles
I have always trusted the Vredestein brand for their winter tires. I chose this brand for all-season tires in the UK. Overall, I find their performance to be excellent, but I was disappointed with the wear on the traction wheels. I fitted 255/45R19 tires on my ID.7 and mostly drive in Eco mode, with slow acceleration and braking through regenerative means. Unfortunately, the tires lasted less than 20,000 miles.
October 31, 2025
Given 90% while driving a Tesla Model 3 LR (235/45 R18) on mostly town for 100 spirited miles
I recently purchased these tyres for my Tesla Model 3 Dual Motor Long Range based on reviews of the original Quatrac tyre. The EV version should theoretically be better, but time will tell. My previous tyres were Michelin Pilot Sport 4 summer tyres, which offered excellent grip and handling.

So far, my impressions of the Quatrac Pro EV are positive. They feel slightly softer and more comfortable, with noise levels that seem about the same. These tyres don’t have the foam band on the inside like some other models.

I typically drive aggressively with Slip-Start ON to make the car more tail-happy. I wore out the Michelins in just one year, so if these tyres also last a year, I’ll be satisfied.

Under hard driving and in rainy conditions, the Vredestein tyres slide slightly more, which I find adds to the fun. Braking performance is good both in wet and dry conditions.

I haven’t driven in snow or on ice yet, but I’ll share a follow-up once I have more experience in those conditions.
November 29, 2024
Rate the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV