Menu

Metzeler Roadtec 01 SE

The Metzeler Roadtec 01 SE is a Premium Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Motorcycles.

6.6
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
94%
Wet Grip
90%
Road Feedback
87%
Handling
93%
Wear
77%
Comfort
80%
Buy again
76%
7 Reviews
85% Average
48,650 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 1st)
Metzeler Roadtec 01 SE

Metzeler Roadtec 01 SE

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
6.6 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Dry
98
1.8x / 1 test

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
98
1 test
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 0
Period: 2020
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 7
Avg Rating: 85.2%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.56
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2020 Motorcycle Sports Touring Tyre Test 2020 180/55 R17 1/6 1 metrics
1
Tests
1st
Average
1st
Best
1st
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
Excellent steering, felt the sportiest of the bunch. They make the bike feel light and nimble with precise steering, excellent levels of confidence, very stable, good levels of grip from cold. Ride quality is a little harsher than some of the other tyres in the test, but lots of feedback and feel. Wonderful tyres.

Questions and Answers for the Metzeler Roadtec 01 SE

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Metzeler Roadtec 01 SE. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Metzeler Roadtec 01 SE Reviews

Given 84% while driving a Honda CBR 500RA (160/60 R17) on mostly country roads for 5,000 spirited miles
I installed my tires on March 10, 2025. I bought them as a set of front and rear tires. The tires give a sense of safety in difficult conditions. In my personal opinion, they have very good grip in rainy road conditions because they give great results when the tires are washed with rainwater.
I bought it a bit expensive, but it is a tire that gives value for money. Would I buy it again? If my budget allows, YES, I would buy the Metzeler Roadtec 01 SE tire again. The country I use it in is Türkiye. The production date is DOT 4224.
Ask a question | Helpful 636
June 16, 2025
Given 93% while driving a Honda CBR650R (180/55 R17) on mostly town for 16,000 spirited miles
The Roadtech01 SE tires perform well in all conditions. I've used them for 16,000 km so far. They're particularly effective and soft in the rain. I really like them, but they're expensive.
September 4, 2025
Given 64% while driving a Ducati Multistrada 1200 (190/55 R17) on mostly motorways for 6,500 spirited miles
Fitted brand new Roadtec on my Miltistrada 1200s. Handling on dry was just perfect, sharp corners, fast coreners, feedback from the road just perfect. But, terrible grip on wet or dusty or any other non-pure-tarmac road. Lasted for about 10k km, with agressive style, 180km/h speeds, wheelie etc. But than, having around 1mm yet to wear started to get wholes in tyre from any small piece of stone on road. Had 4 wholes during my last trip in mountains, and had to swap imeediately in the middle of nowhere.
Overall nice tyre, for perfect roads only. Wouldn't sugest for those who plan to have long trips.
October 17, 2023
Have you driven on the Metzeler Roadtec 01 SE tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Metzeler Roadtec 01 SE? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Metzeler Roadtec 01 SE >

Latest Metzeler Roadtec 01 SE Reviews

Given 97% while driving a Suzuki GSX S1000 (190/55 R17) on mostly country roads for 10,000 average miles
Rear tyre fitted to gsx s1000f. Done 10k touring/fast touring miles. Overall impressive with the tyre, with just occasional slide grips on very fast sharp bends (but always kept get the grip back!). Done also fast mountains roads in wet, felt as on dry (but that depends on the road surface). Covered me trips through 20 countries overall! Never had a front, so can't say (I've run through BT 23 & M9 RR and both can highly recommend for road use).
August 19, 2023
Given 98% while driving a (170/60 R17) on mostly country roads for 200 spirited miles
I've just put a pair of these (120 x 70 x 17 front, 170 x 60 x 17 rear) on a 1996 Kawasaki GPZ1100 to replace Metzler Roadtec Z6. The bike is transformed, at 142kg dry it's no lightweight, it's always felt on the heavy side particularly at low speed, I was running the Z6 front tyre over recommended pressure to lighten the steering, at recommended pressure the steering was really heavy with very noticeable counter steering effort required to get it to lean, not nice. With these fitted and at recommended pressure the steering is light, the ride is much improved, much smoother, it tips into corners effortlessly without thinking about counter steering. Low speed handling is way lighter, and the front is noticeably quieter. It's like a different bike, in a good way. Dry grip is excellent, I've not driven with them in the wet so can't comment, and not had them long enough to comment on wear. Would I buy them again? Unless they wear quickly or some other anomaly appears with use, yes definitely.
May 20, 2023
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 94% while driving a BMW K1600 GTL (190/55 R17) on mostly country roads for 9,950 spirited miles
Lasted 16,000 km (just down to the centre tire wear bars) mostly on British Columbia Canada roads. Front - 120/70ZR17, Rear - 190/55ZR17. Goes into and comes out of corners effortlessly. Riding over a grated metal bridge deck is like riding on a smooth surface.
May 17, 2023
Given 70% while driving a Yamaha MT 07 (180/55 R17 W) on mostly country roads for 1,000 spirited miles
Replaced my Spirit ST’s with Metzeler Roadtec 01 SE and now regret it. The Roadtecs look good and have excellent reviews but they are too hard and too heavy - they ride like they’re filled with concrete. The SE (Sports Edition) version of the Roadtecs are not sporty. I found Avon Spirit ST to be better tyres. Those are grippy and durable but also relatively lightweight and more compliant over uneven road surfaces. If you only ever ride on brand new tarmac then Roadtecs might be OK. If you enjoy the occasional rip around some twisty B roads or just want a smoother ride then Avon Spirit ST’s are a much better choice. They outperform Roadtecs, cost less and are made in the UK.
November 2, 2020