Menu
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate View Gallery (2)
185-235/55-75 R15-17 34 sizes 2009 Winter rated

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

The Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is a Premium Touring All Season tyre designed to be fitted to Vans.

6.2
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
98%
Wet Grip
97%
Road Feedback
90%
Handling
83%
Wear
94%
Comfort
92%
Buy again
99%
Snow Grip
93%
Ice Grip
87%
11 Reviews
93% Average
168,175 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 3rd)
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

All Season Premium
BETA
6.2 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Comfort
95.3
0.29x / 1 test
Snow
90.3
1.38x / 2 tests
Dry
88.9
1.5x / 2 tests
Wet
68.5
2x / 3 tests
Value
57.1
0.38x / 1 test

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
90
3 tests
Handling
69.2
3 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2020
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 11
Avg Rating: 92.5%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 1.53
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2020 Commercial Van All Season Tyre Test Pro Mobil 2020 225/70 R15C 3/7 9 metrics
1
Tests
3rd
Average
3rd
Best
3rd
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
Good lateral grip in the snow, high levels of aquaplaning resistance, balanced and safe handling with very short braking distances in the dry.
Imbalanced traction / lateral grip in the snow, strong understeer in the wet.

Questions and Answers for the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

Ask a question
December 22, 2019

On your % rating above there is about 1% on wear, please explain. Everything else has 100% or 90%.

No one has submitted a wear rating yet for the Agilis CrossClimate
September 15, 2022

What is the speed rating on the 225/75R 16C ?

It looks like that tyre is 121/120 R, up to 106 mph.
September 18, 2024

Are these allowed and suitable for a 2010 Citroen Berlingo XTR?

As long as you can get the correct speed and load rating for your vehicle these would be allowed and suitable.
July 21, 2025

Is there a newer version of this tyre for vans, small amper vans etc. With similar improvements as Crossclimate 3?

There is currently the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate 2 available. Usually the van / commercial versions of the tyres are released significantly after the 'regular' versions, so I do not expect an Agilis CrossClimate 3 to be in the immediate future.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Size Price Range  
205/65 R16 £183.99 - £183.99 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
215/60 R17 £247.99 - £247.99 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
215/65 R16 £184.99 - £184.99 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
225/65 R16 £203.99 - £203.99 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
225/75 R16 £255.99 - £257.99 (2 Prices) Compare Prices >>
235/65 R16 £199.99 - £233.99 (2 Prices) Compare Prices >>
Available in 18 tyre sizes - View all.

YouTube Review

Review Summary

Based on 10 user reviews

Most drivers report the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate delivers outstanding all-weather grip, confident braking, and exceptional longevity, with several citing transformative wet and winter performance and minimal tread wear over high mileage. A minority note a 'floaty' feel at higher speeds and slightly increased road noise. Overall sentiment is strongly positive, emphasizing traction, safety, and durability.

Strengths
  • Excellent all-weather grip
  • Strong wet and snow/ice performance
  • Long tread life/low wear
  • Confidence-inspiring braking and handling
  • Good value over mileage
Areas for Improvement
  • Floaty/soft sidewall feel at higher speeds
  • Slightly increased road noise

Top 3 Michelin Agilis CrossClimate Reviews

Given 100% while driving a Renault Kadjar 1.5DCi (215/60 R17) on for 64,000 miles
Very good service in terms of tire usage, customer service was helpful in every way, thank you very much, I will use this site again for winter tires.
| Helpful 847
October 11, 2024
Ford Benimar Tessoro T486 (235/65 R16) on mostly country roads for 10,000 average miles
Following on from my North Cape autumn motorhome trip, I've tried them in some really hot weather now (35˚C). Still superb, still really pleased with them. 10,000 miles now and around 1mm wear, so looking good for long life.
Ask a question | Helpful 840
June 29, 2024
Given 96% while driving a Ford Transit Custom (215/65 R16) on a combination of roads for 50,000 miles
Fitted at 65k miles. Transformation. Now at 115k... still looking good. Awesome. Agree with the other reviews, plus want to say they last astonishingly well (UK)
March 18, 2024
Have you driven on the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Michelin Agilis CrossClimate >

Latest Michelin Agilis CrossClimate Reviews

Given 93% while driving a Peugeot Expert (215/65 R16) on mostly town for 375 average miles
This is an initial review after just two weeks.

First impressions are very positive of the Agilis CrossClimate. I purchased 4 for my van after having pervious good experience with the summer version of the Agilis and the normal CrossClimate’s fitted to a family member’s car.

Although we have yet to have snow or heavy rain, the wet and dry handling at low temperatures have been impressive (driven them at around -2). I have much more confidence in these than the previous midrange tyres I had installed on my van. Only a day or two after purchasing I had to preform an emergency stop (all be it at lower speeds) and the tyres stopped me dead! From that moment on I have had a lot more confidence driving the van again.

They do make more noise than my previous tyres. They can also feel a bit ‘floaty’ when changing lanes at speed, however they never feel like they are losing grip. Perhaps this will calm down as they wear. On that note, they all came with 9mm of tread depth. Michelin claim it should be 9.9mm. So my measure may be slightly out or their manufacturing tolerances allow this. One handy feature is a % wear indicator. There are 4 levels, 100%, 75%, 50% and 25%. As each level wears away you can quickly see how much tread you have left, without having to measure, which is handy.

I’ll report back in about 6 months with initial wear, as well as how they handle in milder and warmer weather. Hopefully also by then we’ll have had some snow and I can test them on that.
January 18, 2024
Given 93% while driving a Ford Benimar Tessoro T486 (235/65 R16) on a combination of roads for 6,000 average miles
I fitted a set of Agilis CrossClimates to our motorhome for a trip to the North Cape in October/November. The base vehicle is a Mk8 Ford Transit and, fully loaded, the weight is around 3.6 - 3.7 tons. The chosen route was up the east coast of Sweden, then through the north west corner of Finland to the top of Norway. The return was down the west coast of Norway. Research suggested some snow was probable, with lots of single figure sub-zero temperatures and we should be away from the area before the real Arctic winter conditions set in.
The CrossClimates replaced a set of Goodyear summer tyres, which were the factory original fit. Initially they felt what I can only describe as a bit "floaty" at higher speeds (60mph), though this wasn't noticeable at lower speeds (say 40mph). I think they still do feel like that, but I've got used to it.
The snow started just north of Pitea; within 30 miles we were on hard packed snow and that was it for the rest of the way up. One day in Finland we covered around 230 miles on packed snow, with -6C being the maximum temperature. During the trip overall, we drove around 2000 miles on damp or wet roads at, or just above, freezing. We drove perhaps 1500 miles in conditions that were as bad as anything we are ever likely to see during a really severe UK winter; slush, snow, ice, temperatures down to -11C. The tyres were absolutely superb: they hauled us up 3rd gear hills, they steered around hairpin bends, they retarded our speed down "use low gear" hills. They never gave us a single scary moment, they rarely struggled for grip and it was readily restored with just a little bit less power. The worst we got was momentary significant understeer on a bend going up a mid-gear hill on a snowy & icy road. There was good feedback through the steering when the tyres were unhappy. The grip on ice exceeded my expectations; we stopped in a sloping car park that was so icy we could hardly stand. We got straight back into the motorhome and were able to drive away with only momentary wheel spin as we started to move.
As for more normal wet & dry conditions, we haven't had to test the limits of grip, but they never give any hint of a lack of grip. The level of comfort is good, similar to the previous summer tyres. There is a noticeable sound from the tyres on some road surfaces that we didn't get with the previous tyres; not loud, not unpleasant, just noticeable. After the 5500 miles of the trip, I was unable to measure any difference in tread depth with my basic tread depth gauge.
Overall, I was really impressed with the winter performance of these all-season tyres. They made the trip possible, they were safe, they took away the anxiety of driving in conditions that I haven't encountered in decades.
November 22, 2023
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 96% while driving a Citroën DISPATCH (225/65 R16) on mostly country roads for 30,000 miles
I have used cross climate on a Citroen Berlingo van and a Citroen dispatch. Both vans did 20k before swapping fronts and rears. Both vans have the same tyres 30k later with plenty of tread remaining. These are the best tyres I've had fitted and they are now all I purchase. I pay roughly £110 per tyre, which isn't cheap but the millage I get makes them great value considering I've had to replace Hancooks after 12k and also had one not so much blow out as completely erupt on the rear of a transit custom.
April 12, 2022
Given 98% while driving a Mercedes Benz Sprinter Van (235/65 R16) on a combination of roads for 0 spirited miles
These tyres must be the best on the market, The pictures of them don't do them justice. I have never had tyres like these, the traction they give is outstanding, they look fantastic and the performance is fantastic. They are quiet and give you confidence on all surfaces and in all weather, The tread is chunky and is the tyre for anyone looking for traction and braking power, I only wish they made a size to fit my 4x4.
January 25, 2021
Ford F250 (245/75 R16) on mostly motorways for 0 miles
I installed the Michelin Agilis because the BFG Commercial T/A's were a little noisy. They were quieter but suffered from excessive sidewall play. I'd turn the wheel and it would be half to 3/4 of a second before the truck started to turn. I initially thought I had driven into major wind the way the truck moved around. I checked pressure just to be sure that wasn't the issue and they were at 80 psi. I've driven 600,000 miles in my life and my trucks always had the L/S. I've never experienced a Michelin with as much sidewall play. I have a high performance bmw with Pilot Super Sports as well so I'm a car guy who's owned nothing but Michelins.
I don't know what the issue is or was but I went back to the noisy BFG's.
‘99 F-250, reg cab, long bed, v10 with 260,000 miles. No worn ball joints or ball studs in the front end when tested.
January 13, 2020
Given 97% while driving a Renault Master (2018) (225/65 R16) on a combination of roads for 5,000 spirited miles
Tyres feel great and although not tested in cold weather/snow, they appear to have the quality to carry them through any conditions. A little noisy (low drone) compared to the standard Agilis 51, particularly on hard cornering but not enough of a noise for it to be a problem
November 12, 2018
Given 100% while driving a Citroën New Relay (225/75 R16 R) on a combination of roads for 300 average miles
These tyres were recently bought for our Citroen New Relay L4H2 van and have transformed the wet and dry grip. No snow yet but having previous experience of the CrossClimate SUV tyre on a private car, which are every bit as good as a full winter tyre in the snow , I do not doubt Michelin's claims.
October 7, 2018