Test Publication:
Unknown
205/55 R16
8 tyres
4 categories
Test Publication:
Unknown
Test Size:
205/55 R16
Tyres Tested:
8 tyres
The Norwegian AutoMobile Federation (NAF) has tested seven summer tyre patterns in 205/55 R16, and included a premium winter tyre for comparison.
The winter tyre performed surprisingly well during the wet braking testing, which was tested between 18 and 25c, beating the Dunlop and Bridgestone summer tyres. Wet handling showed a little more weakness, with the winter tyre finishing last, but it was still within a few percent of the summer tyres.
As with all siped tyres, the penalty came in the dry. Testing at 21-23c, the winter tyre was at a huge disadvantage, stopping the car nearly 30% further on than the best summer tyre on test, which is the difference between stopping safely, and having a huge accident! While the tyre was closer during dry handling, it was still significantly slower than all the summer tyres.
Let this test be a good reminder as to why we shouldn't run winter tyres, or winter-bias all season tyres across the dry summer months.
Full data below.
Dry
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Nokian Hakka Blue 2
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Reference Winter
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Nokian Hakka Blue 2
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Reference Winter
Wet
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Nokian Hakka Blue 2
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Reference Winter
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Nokian Hakka Blue 2
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Reference Winter
- Reference Winter
- Nokian Hakka Blue 2
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Continental Premium Contact 6
Environment
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Dunlop Sport BluResponse
- Firestone RoadHawk
- Nokian Hakka Blue 2
- Reference Winter
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Michelin Primacy 4
Results
Excellent lateral stability on dry and wet surfaces, impressive braking performance, especially on dry surfaces, low noise.
The weakest resistance to aquaplaning.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
1st |
34.6 M |
|
|
100% |
| Dry Handling |
1st |
108.52 s |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
2nd |
50.5 M |
49.1 M |
+1.4 M |
97.23% |
| Wet Handling |
1st |
69.46 s |
|
|
100% |
| Straight Aqua |
8th |
79.8 Km/H |
90.1 Km/H |
-10.3 Km/H |
88.57% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
1st |
72.2 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
3rd |
5.48 kg / t |
5.34 kg / t |
+0.14 kg / t |
97.45% |
Short braking distance, high lateral stability and good handling on wet surfaces.
Relatively long braking distance and insufficient dry handling, highest fuel consumption.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
6th |
36.1 M |
34.6 M |
+1.5 M |
95.84% |
| Dry Handling |
6th |
109.38 s |
108.52 s |
+0.86 s |
99.21% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
3rd |
50.9 M |
49.1 M |
+1.8 M |
96.46% |
| Wet Handling |
4th |
70.18 s |
69.46 s |
+0.72 s |
98.97% |
| Straight Aqua |
2nd |
84 Km/H |
90.1 Km/H |
-6.1 Km/H |
93.23% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
5th |
72.8 dB |
72.2 dB |
+0.6 dB |
99.18% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
8th |
5.62 kg / t |
5.34 kg / t |
+0.28 kg / t |
95.02% |
Accurate and fast reactions to steering, low noise.
Relatively long braking distance on wet roads.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
3rd |
35.6 M |
34.6 M |
+1 M |
97.19% |
| Dry Handling |
3rd |
109 s |
108.52 s |
+0.48 s |
99.56% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
7th |
52.5 M |
49.1 M |
+3.4 M |
93.52% |
| Wet Handling |
5th |
70.38 s |
69.46 s |
+0.92 s |
98.69% |
| Straight Aqua |
4th |
82.8 Km/H |
90.1 Km/H |
-7.3 Km/H |
91.9% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
3rd |
72.4 dB |
72.2 dB |
+0.2 dB |
99.72% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
4th |
5.51 kg / t |
5.34 kg / t |
+0.17 kg / t |
96.91% |
High lateral stability, quick steering, neutral balance.
High noise levels.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
3rd |
35.6 M |
34.6 M |
+1 M |
97.19% |
| Dry Handling |
2nd |
108.94 s |
108.52 s |
+0.42 s |
99.61% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
4th |
51.3 M |
49.1 M |
+2.2 M |
95.71% |
| Wet Handling |
2nd |
69.82 s |
69.46 s |
+0.36 s |
99.48% |
| Straight Aqua |
5th |
81.9 Km/H |
90.1 Km/H |
-8.2 Km/H |
90.9% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
3rd |
72.4 dB |
72.2 dB |
+0.2 dB |
99.72% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
6th |
5.58 kg / t |
5.34 kg / t |
+0.24 kg / t |
95.7% |
Excellent braking performance.
Weak lateral stability.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
5th |
35.9 M |
34.6 M |
+1.3 M |
96.38% |
| Dry Handling |
7th |
109.4 s |
108.52 s |
+0.88 s |
99.2% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
1st |
49.1 M |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Handling |
7th |
71.14 s |
69.46 s |
+1.68 s |
97.64% |
| Straight Aqua |
3rd |
83.8 Km/H |
90.1 Km/H |
-6.3 Km/H |
93.01% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
8th |
73.4 dB |
72.2 dB |
+1.2 dB |
98.37% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
5th |
5.57 kg / t |
5.34 kg / t |
+0.23 kg / t |
95.87% |
Low fuel consumption, high aquaplaning resistance.
Weak lateral stability, understeer and long braking in the dry, elevated noise.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
7th |
36.3 M |
34.6 M |
+1.7 M |
95.32% |
| Dry Handling |
5th |
109.31 s |
108.52 s |
+0.79 s |
99.28% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
5th |
51.7 M |
49.1 M |
+2.6 M |
94.97% |
| Wet Handling |
6th |
71.09 s |
69.46 s |
+1.63 s |
97.71% |
| Straight Aqua |
6th |
81.8 Km/H |
90.1 Km/H |
-8.3 Km/H |
90.79% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
7th |
73 dB |
72.2 dB |
+0.8 dB |
98.9% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
2nd |
5.39 kg / t |
5.34 kg / t |
+0.05 kg / t |
99.07% |
Good handling and grip in the dry and wet, short dry braking distances.
Longest wet braking, low aquaplaning resistance, noise.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
2nd |
35.5 M |
34.6 M |
+0.9 M |
97.46% |
| Dry Handling |
4th |
109.01 s |
108.52 s |
+0.49 s |
99.55% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
8th |
53.1 M |
49.1 M |
+4 M |
92.47% |
| Wet Handling |
3rd |
70.08 s |
69.46 s |
+0.62 s |
99.12% |
| Straight Aqua |
7th |
81.3 Km/H |
90.1 Km/H |
-8.8 Km/H |
90.23% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
1st |
72.2 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
1st |
5.34 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
Very high aquaplaning resistance, short braking and good lateral grip in the wet.
Poor handling and very long braking distances in the dry.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
8th |
46 M |
34.6 M |
+11.4 M |
75.22% |
| Dry Handling |
8th |
111.13 s |
108.52 s |
+2.61 s |
97.65% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
6th |
52 M |
49.1 M |
+2.9 M |
94.42% |
| Wet Handling |
8th |
71.51 s |
69.46 s |
+2.05 s |
97.13% |
| Straight Aqua |
1st |
90.1 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
5th |
72.8 dB |
72.2 dB |
+0.6 dB |
99.18% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
7th |
5.61 kg / t |
5.34 kg / t |
+0.27 kg / t |
95.19% |
I need help choosing between these tires: Nokian wetproof- Turanza t005 - Dunlop sport bluresponse. Thanks
I'd be looking at Nokian VS Bridgestone and trying to find a test they've both been in!
Hi, thanks for the advice. After looking at the tests, I think I choose bridgstone. Unfortunately Nokian wetproof has a very bad result to the rolling resistance.
Is there a mistake? The Bridgestones got equal 1st place for noise with the quietest reading, but had 'noise' as a negative?
without revisiting the original test, it could be a mistake, or it could be the difference between external and internal noise. Check out other tests to see how they do.
This is a bit depression - for me there is no outright winner they all have apparent serious weaknesses. But the Roadhawk looks like a good all rounder.
OK So I am Flummoxed. My Size is actually 195/55/16 V91 I have worn Conti PC5 and want something different maybe a little better on wear and much the same Wet and Dry performance (Bit quieter would also help!) - Just a very few Summer tyres will give a little grip in the snow - that would be a bonus (Falken ZE 915; Maxxis HP5) I have a medium short list but going around in circles!! :- Dunlop Blue Response; Hankook VP3; Vredestein Sportrac 5; Maxxis HP5; Poss Bridgestone T005 - but stopping in the wet concerns me. Any suggestions - (Seat Ibiza 2017)
Well, none of those will give particularly great snow grip!
I'd probably aim at the T005 as it's been testing relatively well in the smaller sizes.
Thanks. No I agree about summer tyre snow grip - non are like a winter or an all season - but a few are a lot better than others and some are especially useless in the snow. In this country most of us cannot afford to buy a complete spare set of Winter tyres on the off chance of a day or two of snow... I will look again at the T005 I was just concerned also of soft tyre walls when I saw some and also they are more noisy. Any tyre will be a compromise though.