Menu

2015 Sport Auto 235/35 R19 UHP Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
5 min read Updated
Contents
  1. Introduction
  2. The Results
  3. Pirelli P Zero
  4. Continental ContiSportContact 5 P
  5. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
  6. Dunlop SportMaxx RT
  7. Nokian zLine
  8. Bridgestone Potenza S001
  9. Kumho Ecsta PS91

Test Summary
Wet Braking Pirelli P Zero
Dry Braking Pirelli P Zero
Rolling Resistance Dunlop SportMaxx RT
Noise Pirelli P Zero
Dunlop SportMaxx RT
Snow Handling Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
Dunlop SportMaxx RT
With the UK being the largest optional "big wheel" upgrader in Europe, you'd have thought the likes of EVO and Auto Express would test a bigger tyre size than the usual 17" size they choose! Fortunately, Germany has the answer, and this year Sport Auto Magazine tested seven patterns in 235/35 R19, the most common 19" tyre size on the market, using a VW Golf R.

All tyres are now rated by the European standardised labels, which grades the rolling resistance and wet grip on an A-F scale. Currently no manufacturer has the technology to make an A/A rated tyre in 235/35 R19, so the best on test were the Dunlop and Continental with a "C/A". The Nokian, Hankook and Pirelli came in with a slightly worse rolling resistance score, at "E/A" and the Bridgestone and Kumho tyres graded themselves as "F/B".

The Results

Proving its sporty background, Pirelli won the test with the P Zero. Thanks to a balanced performance with a particularly strong wet result the Pirelli P Zero was the only tyre to be "Very recommended".

Second to fifth were all awarded the "Recommended" status, with the Continental Sport Contact 5P narrowly beating the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo2 to second place thanks to a slightly stronger wet performance. Dunlop finished fourth with the SportMaxx RT, interestingly the tyre was praised for sharp steering in the wet, but poor steering in the dry which seems to be a confusing mix of qualities, and the Nokian zLine finished in fifth with a balance performance, but slow steering.

In joint sixth were Bridgestone and Kumho. The Bridgestone Potenza S001 had a poor time in the wet, and the Kumho Ecsta PS91 had an even worse time in the wet, but performed slightly better in the dry than the Bridgestone.

We've included the weight measurements in the final result. The Dunlop was the lightest tyre at 8.7kgs, and the Nokian the heaviest at 9.9kgs.

The overall score is weighted 40% wet, 50% dry and 10% noise and rolling resistance.

1st

Pirelli P Zero

235/35 R19
Pirelli P Zero
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 42.9
Dry 9.7
Wet 9.2
Comfort 9
Rolling Resistance 8
Noise 7
Continental ContiSportContact 5 P
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 40
Dry 9
Wet 9
Comfort 8
Rolling Resistance 7
Noise 7
3rd

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2

235/35 R19
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 42.7
Dry 8.8
Wet 8.9
Comfort 8
Rolling Resistance 7
Noise 10
4th

Dunlop SportMaxx RT

235/35 R19
Dunlop SportMaxx RT
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 45.2
Dry 8.3
Wet 7.9
Comfort 9
Rolling Resistance 10
Noise 10
5th

Nokian zLine

235/35 R19
Nokian zLine
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 40.4
Dry 8
Wet 8.4
Comfort 8
Rolling Resistance 9
Noise 7
6th

Bridgestone Potenza S001

235/35 R19
Bridgestone Potenza S001
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 35.2
Dry 7.6
Wet 7.6
Comfort 6
Rolling Resistance 7
Noise 7
7th

Kumho Ecsta PS91

235/35 R19
Kumho Ecsta PS91
  • 3PMSF: no
Total: 37.8
Dry 8.8
Wet 6
Comfort 8
Rolling Resistance 7
Noise 8

comments powered by Disqus