In their second SUV / 4x4 all season tyre test of 2019, Auto Bild have tested ten all season tyres in 235/65 R17, and included the usual summer and winter tyre as benchmarks.

In this test, the new Bridgestone Weather Control A005 matchs the Michelin CrossClimate SUV overall, drawing for first place. Both tyres offered an excellent balance of qualities, but it's worth noting that there was no wear testing in this test, which is where the Michelin often excels and the new A005 has struggled.

Third place was again a tie, with the Continental AllSeasonContact drawing with the new Hankook Kinergy 4S2X. Like the Michelin and Continental, both tyres performed well in nearly all categories, but had slightly longer dry braking than the best on test.

Read on below for the full data and results.

Dry

While the summer tyre had its usual advantage in dry braking, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 kept the Michelin CrossClimate SUV honest, stopping 0.8 meters behind its French rival.

Dry Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
RefReference Summer	35.2 m	-3.40 m
1Michelin CrossClimate SUV	38.6 m	Best
2Bridgestone Weather Control A005	39.4 m	+0.80 m
3Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season	41.2 m	+2.60 m
4Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210	41.9 m	+3.30 m
5Continental AllSeasonContact	42.5 m	+3.90 m
6Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SUV	42.6 m	+4.00 m
7Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	42.7 m	+4.10 m
8Nankang Cross Season AW 8 SUV	44 m	+5.40 m
9Toyo Celsius	44.7 m	+6.10 m
RefReference Winter	45 m	+6.40 m
10Kleber Citilander	45.9 m	+7.30 m

The difference between best and worst was 30.4% (10.7 m ≈ 2.4 Car Lengths).

The top three remained the same during the dry handling testing, with the new Hankook matching the Bridgestone.

Dry Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
RefReference Summer	113.3 km/h	+1.90 km/h
1Michelin CrossClimate SUV	111.4 km/h	Best
2Bridgestone Weather Control A005	110.8 km/h	-0.60 km/h
2Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	110.8 km/h	-0.60 km/h
4Continental AllSeasonContact	110.6 km/h	-0.80 km/h
5Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SUV	110.3 km/h	-1.10 km/h
6Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season	110.1 km/h	-1.30 km/h
7Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210	109.9 km/h	-1.50 km/h
8Toyo Celsius	109.4 km/h	-2.00 km/h
RefReference Winter	109.4 km/h	-2.00 km/h
9Kleber Citilander	108.4 km/h	-3.00 km/h
10Nankang Cross Season AW 8 SUV	108.2 km/h	-3.20 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 4.5% (5.1 Km/H).

Wet

During the wet braking testing the Bridgestone once again proved it is a class leading wet braking tyre, and was the only tyre to beat the summer tyre. Third to fifth places were covered by less than a meter.

Wet Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Bridgestone Weather Control A005	46.9 m	Best
RefReference Summer	48.5 m	+1.60 m
2Continental AllSeasonContact	50.5 m	+3.60 m
3Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SUV	50.8 m	+3.90 m
RefReference Winter	50.8 m	+3.90 m
4Michelin CrossClimate SUV	51.1 m	+4.20 m
5Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	51.7 m	+4.80 m
6Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210	55.2 m	+8.30 m
7Toyo Celsius	55.8 m	+8.90 m
8Kleber Citilander	57.1 m	+10.20 m
9Nankang Cross Season AW 8 SUV	59.3 m	+12.40 m
10Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season	59.7 m	+12.80 m

The difference between best and worst was 27.3% (12.8 m ≈ 2.8 Car Lengths).

The summer tyre took back the advantage during wet handling, but the Bridgestone was again the best all season tyre. Interestingly, the reference winter tyre also out performed most of the all season tyres.

Wet Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
RefReference Summer	73.6 km/h	+1.10 km/h
1Bridgestone Weather Control A005	72.5 km/h	Best
RefReference Winter	71.1 km/h	-1.40 km/h
2Continental AllSeasonContact	70.3 km/h	-2.20 km/h
2Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	70.3 km/h	-2.20 km/h
4Michelin CrossClimate SUV	69.9 km/h	-2.60 km/h
5Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SUV	69.7 km/h	-2.80 km/h
6Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210	68.9 km/h	-3.60 km/h
7Toyo Celsius	68.8 km/h	-3.70 km/h
8Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season	67.1 km/h	-5.40 km/h
9Kleber Citilander	66.3 km/h	-6.20 km/h
10Nankang Cross Season AW 8 SUV	65.8 km/h	-6.70 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 10.6% (7.8 Km/H).

The Michelin CrossClimate isn't usually a strong tyre in aquaplaning testing, but in this size it seems to perform extremely well, winning straight aquaplaning.

Straight Aqua
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Michelin CrossClimate SUV	94.8 km/h	Best
2Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	92.1 km/h	-2.70 km/h
RefReference Summer	90.5 km/h	-4.30 km/h
3Bridgestone Weather Control A005	90 km/h	-4.80 km/h
4Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SUV	89.3 km/h	-5.50 km/h
5Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210	88.7 km/h	-6.10 km/h
RefReference Winter	88.3 km/h	-6.50 km/h
6Continental AllSeasonContact	86.7 km/h	-8.10 km/h
7Kleber Citilander	82.5 km/h	-12.30 km/h
8Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season	80.5 km/h	-14.30 km/h
9Toyo Celsius	79.8 km/h	-15.00 km/h
10Nankang Cross Season AW 8 SUV	78.6 km/h	-16.20 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 17.1% (16.2 Km/H).

Snow

The reference winter tyre was the best in the snow, and when compared to the summer tyre all the all season tyres were extremely capable.

Snow Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
RefReference Winter	23.5 m	-0.30 m
1Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	23.8 m	Best
2Continental AllSeasonContact	23.9 m	+0.10 m
3Nankang Cross Season AW 8 SUV	24.5 m	+0.70 m
4Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SUV	24.8 m	+1.00 m
4Toyo Celsius	24.8 m	+1.00 m
4Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210	24.8 m	+1.00 m
7Bridgestone Weather Control A005	25.1 m	+1.30 m
8Michelin CrossClimate SUV	25.4 m	+1.60 m
9Kleber Citilander	25.9 m	+2.10 m
10Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season	29.9 m	+6.10 m
RefReference Summer	58.2 m	+34.40 m

The difference between best and worst was 147.7% (34.7 m ≈ 7.7 Car Lengths).

The Continental AllSeasonContact won the snow handling test, with the Michelin CrossClimate unusually finishing second.

Snow Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Continental AllSeasonContact	52.5 km/h	Best
2Michelin CrossClimate SUV	51.7 km/h	-0.80 km/h
3Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	51.2 km/h	-1.30 km/h
4Bridgestone Weather Control A005	50.8 km/h	-1.70 km/h
5Toyo Celsius	50.6 km/h	-1.90 km/h
RefReference Winter	50.6 km/h	-1.90 km/h
6Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210	50.3 km/h	-2.20 km/h
7Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season	50.1 km/h	-2.40 km/h
7Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SUV	50.1 km/h	-2.40 km/h
9Kleber Citilander	49.3 km/h	-3.20 km/h
RefReference Summer	33.8 km/h	-18.70 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 35.6% (18.7 Km/H).

Snow traction testing continued the trend of Continental, Michelin and Hankook performing well in the snow.

Snow Traction
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
RefReference Winter	3514 N	+85.00 N
1Continental AllSeasonContact	3429 N	Best
2Michelin CrossClimate SUV	3427 N	-2.00 N
3Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	3395 N	-34.00 N
4Bridgestone Weather Control A005	3346 N	-83.00 N
5Nankang Cross Season AW 8 SUV	3339 N	-90.00 N
6Toyo Celsius	3322 N	-107.00 N
7Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210	3281 N	-148.00 N
8Kleber Citilander	3222 N	-207.00 N
9Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SUV	3212 N	-217.00 N
10Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season	2494 N	-935.00 N
RefReference Summer	1210 N	-2,219.00 N

The difference between best and worst was 65.6% (2,304 N).

Environment

The Continental had an impressive advantage in fuel usage.

Rolling Resistance
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Extra fuel / year
1Continental AllSeasonContact	6.17 kg/t	Best	£0
2Bridgestone Weather Control A005	6.91 kg/t	+0.74 kg/t	£53
3Nankang Cross Season AW 8 SUV	6.92 kg/t	+0.75 kg/t	£54
4Michelin CrossClimate SUV	7.2 kg/t	+1.03 kg/t	£74
RefReference Summer	7.38 kg/t	+1.21 kg/t	£86
5Kleber Citilander	7.68 kg/t	+1.51 kg/t	£108
6Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SUV	7.75 kg/t	+1.58 kg/t	£113
7Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	7.98 kg/t	+1.81 kg/t	£129
8Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210	8.04 kg/t	+1.87 kg/t	£134
RefReference Winter	8.23 kg/t	+2.06 kg/t	£147
9Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season	8.46 kg/t	+2.29 kg/t	£164
10Toyo Celsius	8.52 kg/t	+2.35 kg/t	£168

The difference between best and worst was 38.1% (2.35 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Toyo Celsius uses about 116 L (£168) more fuel than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

Petrol/Diesel Electric

Annual Mileage

19,000 km

km (L)

miles (US gal)

Fuel Price

£1.45/L

GBP (£)

EUR (€)

USD ($)

Set my vehicle consumption

Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

The Hankook and Michelin were the quietest on test.

Noise
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	70.6 dB	Best
2Michelin CrossClimate SUV	70.8 dB	+0.20 dB
3Bridgestone Weather Control A005	71.3 dB	+0.70 dB
RefReference Summer	71.7 dB	+1.10 dB
4Continental AllSeasonContact	72 dB	+1.40 dB
5Nankang Cross Season AW 8 SUV	72.4 dB	+1.80 dB
6Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SUV	72.5 dB	+1.90 dB
RefReference Winter	72.6 dB	+2.00 dB
7Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season	72.8 dB	+2.20 dB
8Toyo Celsius	73 dB	+2.40 dB
9Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210	74.8 dB	+4.20 dB
10Kleber Citilander	75.8 dB	+5.20 dB

The difference between best and worst was 7.4% (5.2 dB).

Unsurprisingly, some of the best tyres on test were also the most expensive. You get what you pay for, especially in the all season / winter segment.

Results

Dry98.7%

Wet99.4%

Snow96.3%

Comfort99%

Rolling Resistance89.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (10)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	39.4 m	+0.80 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 10	110.8 km/h	-0.60 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	46.9 m	Best in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 10	72.5 km/h	Best in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better	3^rd / 10	90 km/h	-4.80 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	7^th / 10	25.1 m	+1.30 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	4^th / 10	3346 N	-83.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 9	50.8 km/h	-1.70 km/h
NoiseLower is better	3^rd / 10	71.3 dB	+0.70 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	2^nd / 10	6.91 kg/t	+0.74 kg/t

Price: 530.00

Dry100%

Wet94.7%

Snow97.2%

Comfort99.7%

Rolling Resistance85.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (10)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	38.6 m	Best in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 10	111.4 km/h	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	51.1 m	+4.20 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 10	69.9 km/h	-2.60 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better	1^st / 10	94.8 km/h	Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better	8^th / 10	25.4 m	+1.60 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	2^nd / 10	3427 N	-2.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 9	51.7 km/h	-0.80 km/h
NoiseLower is better	2^nd / 10	70.8 dB	+0.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	4^th / 10	7.2 kg/t	+1.03 kg/t

Price: 610.00

Dry95.1%

Wet94.5%

Snow99.9%

Comfort98.1%

Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (10)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	5^th / 10	42.5 m	+3.90 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 10	110.6 km/h	-0.80 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	50.5 m	+3.60 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 10	70.3 km/h	-2.20 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better	6^th / 10	86.7 km/h	-8.10 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	23.9 m	+0.10 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	1^st / 10	3429 N	Best in this discipline
Snow HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 9	52.5 km/h	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	4^th / 10	72 dB	+1.40 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	1^st / 10	6.17 kg/t	Best in this discipline

Price: 610.00

Dry94.9%

Wet94.2%

Snow98.8%

Comfort100%

Rolling Resistance77.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (10)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	7^th / 10	42.7 m	+4.10 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 10	110.8 km/h	-0.60 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	5^th / 10	51.7 m	+4.80 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 10	70.3 km/h	-2.20 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better	2^nd / 10	92.1 km/h	-2.70 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	23.8 m	Best in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better	3^rd / 10	3395 N	-34.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 9	51.2 km/h	-1.30 km/h
NoiseLower is better	1^st / 10	70.6 dB	Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	7^th / 10	7.98 kg/t	+1.81 kg/t

Price: 465.00

Dry94.8%

Wet94.2%

Snow95.1%

Comfort97.4%

Rolling Resistance79.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (10)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	6^th / 10	42.6 m	+4.00 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 10	110.3 km/h	-1.10 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	50.8 m	+3.90 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 10	69.7 km/h	-2.80 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better	4^th / 10	89.3 km/h	-5.50 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	24.8 m	+1.00 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	9^th / 10	3212 N	-217.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 9	50.1 km/h	-2.40 km/h
NoiseLower is better	6^th / 10	72.5 dB	+1.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	6^th / 10	7.75 kg/t	+1.58 kg/t

Price: 570.00

Dry95.4%

Wet90.3%

Snow95.8%

Comfort94.4%

Rolling Resistance76.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (10)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	41.9 m	+3.30 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 10	109.9 km/h	-1.50 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	6^th / 10	55.2 m	+8.30 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 10	68.9 km/h	-3.60 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better	5^th / 10	88.7 km/h	-6.10 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	24.8 m	+1.00 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	7^th / 10	3281 N	-148.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 9	50.3 km/h	-2.20 km/h
NoiseLower is better	9^th / 10	74.8 dB	+4.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	8^th / 10	8.04 kg/t	+1.87 kg/t

Price: 470.00

Dry92.3%

Wet88.8%

Snow96.4%

Comfort96.7%

Rolling Resistance72.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (10)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	44.7 m	+6.10 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 10	109.4 km/h	-2.00 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	7^th / 10	55.8 m	+8.90 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 10	68.8 km/h	-3.70 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better	9^th / 10	79.8 km/h	-15.00 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	24.8 m	+1.00 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	6^th / 10	3322 N	-107.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 9	50.6 km/h	-1.90 km/h
NoiseLower is better	8^th / 10	73 dB	+2.40 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	10^th / 10	8.52 kg/t	+2.35 kg/t

Price: 480.00

Dry90.7%

Wet86.8%

Snow93.2%

Comfort93.1%

Rolling Resistance80.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (10)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	45.9 m	+7.30 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 10	108.4 km/h	-3.00 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	8^th / 10	57.1 m	+10.20 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 10	66.3 km/h	-6.20 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better	7^th / 10	82.5 km/h	-12.30 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	25.9 m	+2.10 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	8^th / 10	3222 N	-207.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 9	49.3 km/h	-3.20 km/h
NoiseLower is better	10^th / 10	75.8 dB	+5.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	5^th / 10	7.68 kg/t	+1.51 kg/t

Price: 460.00

Dry92.4%

Wet84.6%

Snow63.2%

Comfort97.5%

Rolling Resistance89.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	8^th / 10	44 m	+5.40 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 10	108.2 km/h	-3.20 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	59.3 m	+12.40 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 10	65.8 km/h	-6.70 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better	10^th / 10	78.6 km/h	-16.20 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	24.5 m	+0.70 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	5^th / 10	3339 N	-90.00 N
NoiseLower is better	5^th / 10	72.4 dB	+1.80 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	3^rd / 10	6.92 kg/t	+0.75 kg/t

Price: 450.00

Dry96.3%

Wet85.4%

Snow83.1%

Comfort97%

Rolling Resistance72.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (10)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	41.2 m	+2.60 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 10	110.1 km/h	-1.30 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	59.7 m	+12.80 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 10	67.1 km/h	-5.40 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better	8^th / 10	80.5 km/h	-14.30 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	29.9 m	+6.10 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	10^th / 10	2494 N	-935.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 9	50.1 km/h	-2.40 km/h
NoiseLower is better	7^th / 10	72.8 dB	+2.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	9^th / 10	8.46 kg/t	+2.29 kg/t

Price: 485.00

Discussion

3 comments

MausyMaus Dec 12, 2019 archived

Hey John,
Did Autobild just change their results ? or am I confused ?
I thought i commented on this with the Vredestein Quatrac 5 ?

#5435
1. TyreReviews MausyMaus Dec 12, 2019 archived
  
  You mean this? http://www.tyrereviews.co.u...
  
  #5436
  1. MausyMaus TyreReviews Dec 12, 2019 archived
    
    No, there is the Bridgestone A005 Nr. 1 you remember where i wrote about the 245/45/20 size for our Land Rover (Quatrac 5) you had also the Quatrac 5 on Nr.1 about regarding the Auto Bild 4x4 Test. (It seemd to be that Autobild changed/updated their results/article)
    Edit: I found ithttp://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/Article/2019-Auto-Bild-SUV-All-Season-Tyre-Test.htm
    
    #5437

Tyre	Bridgestone Weather Control A005	Michelin CrossClimate SUV	Continental AllSeasonContact	Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SUV	Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210	Toyo Celsius	Kleber Citilander	Nankang Cross Season AW 8 SUV	Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season
Position	Joint 1^st	Joint 1^st	Joint 3^rd	Joint 3^rd	5^th	6^th	7^th	8^th	9^th	10^th
Category scores (% of best)
Dry	98.7%	100%	95.1%	94.9%	94.8%	95.4%	92.3%	90.7%	92.4%	96.3%
Wet	99.4%	94.7%	94.5%	94.2%	94.2%	90.3%	88.8%	86.8%	84.6%	85.4%
Snow	96.3%	97.2%	99.9%	98.8%	95.1%	95.8%	96.4%	93.2%	63.2%	83.1%
Comfort	99%	99.7%	98.1%	100%	97.4%	94.4%	96.7%	93.1%	97.5%	97%
Rolling Resistance	89.3%	85.7%	100%	77.3%	79.6%	76.7%	72.4%	80.3%	89.2%	72.9%
Keep researching	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results

Menu

Tyre shortlist

The evidence behind the verdict

Dry

Wet

Snow

Environment

Results

Cross-check this test