Menu

Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S

The Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S is a Premium Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.0
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
82%
Wet Grip
82%
Road Feedback
74%
Handling
80%
Wear
50%
Comfort
84%
Buy again
36%
5 Reviews
70% Average
67,996 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 13th)
Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S

Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S

Summer Premium
BETA
7 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2015
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 5
Avg Rating: 69.7%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.08
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2015 European Tyre Test 205/55 R16 ADAC 2015 205/55 R16 13/19 0 metrics
1
Tests
13th
Average
13th
Best
13th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
13th/19
Top marks in fuel consumption, good in the dry
Somewhat weak in the wet, slightly high wear
Size Fuel Wet Noise
15 inch
185/65 R15 88 H A B 69
185/65 R15 92 V XL B A 70
185/65 R15 92 V XL B A 70
185/65 R15 92 V XL A A 69
185/65 R15 92 V XL A A 69
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S >>

Questions and Answers for the Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Size Price Range  
185/65 R15 £102.99 - £107.99 (3 Prices) Compare Prices >>
Available in 1 tyre sizes - View all.

Top 3 Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S Reviews

Given 67% while driving a Peugeot bipper (185/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 7,500 average miles
THIS TYRE IS A REINFORCED SIDEWALL TYRE USED ON A SMALL VAN PEUGEOT BIPPER
The van has had several sets of premium tyres before from pirrelli goodyear michelin ect
The bridgestone ecopias lasted half as long as the competitors and wore unevenly.
Note:these are marketed as a road tyre for general use.gripo is excellent but the wear is awful and uneven 7.5k and BALD.
Would not buy again
September 20, 2025
Given 39% while driving a Toyota Yaris Mk4 Hybrid 1.5 (XP210, M15A FXE) (185/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 21,700 spirited miles
35K of kilometers on Yaris 2021 Hybrid. A word: Disaster. From the first day the tyres were sliding in all the weather conditions. I can't understand the review scores I see from the other reviewers. It is so bad that makes me suspicious Changed them to a "just good" tyre (not even close to the best) of this category (Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact) and the difference is obvious from the first turn in. I wouldn't recommend them
August 23, 2022
Given 79% while driving a Renault Laguna I (195/65 R15 H) on a combination of roads for 26,780 average miles
When I bough my car (used) it came fitted with 4 Firestone Firehawk TZ300a (F-C-71dB) tyres with around 50% tread left and drove with them for 21338miles. It was a good all round tyre, although a bit uncomfortable on bad roads due to how hard the sidewalls were, and the fuel consumption was around 54-57 MPG (mixed highway and city).
The first thing I noticed when bough the 4 Bridgestone EP001S was that they came only with ~6mm tread when new, instead of the usual ~8mm. The second thing I noticed was how jello-like and lightweight they were compared to the Firestones.
The EP001S was a very comfortable, silent and grippy tire from new to old. The fuel economy went up to 59-62 MPG (mixed highway and city), and in country roads it was outstanding with 70-78 MPG !!!
The downsides of these tires were related to how soft the sidewalls are, even if inflated more (between 2.5 to 2.7bar) than the car manual recommends. The road feedback becomes reduced (good for confort) but very bad to know how the tyres are doing in the road. The grip was always assuring, although they wore pretty rapidly on the outside due to the sidewalls bending too much. I had to change them because of the high wear (they became slick) on the outside, although there was plenty of meat left in the inside and center of the tyres.
Maybe it it were a smaller and lighter car I wouldn't have this problem, but based on my experience I didn't buy the same tire again, as I enjoy taking turns fast. After these I went for the Bridgestone Turanza T001 (C-B-71dB) and they lasted ~ 43.000 miles without this sidewall problem!
January 8, 2018

How would you rate the Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S Reviews

Given 74% while driving a Rover 75 auto (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 16 average miles
Great tyre only lasted 16,000 miles , on my Rover 75 & i dont drive hard (pensioner) . Yes ! tracking was perfect and pressures correct & checked cold once a month or before any long journey . Pity about about they wore out so fast , were a great tyre otherwise .
September 20, 2015
Given 90% while driving a Peugeot 307 (205/55 R16 V) on mostly country roads for 12,000 average miles
Tyres fitted to front only. so far good grip in wet and dry had Avon ZV before and wear was high but these are lasting a lot longer :-)
July 27, 2015
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Rate the Bridgestone Ecopia EP001S