Menu

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23

The Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 is a Premium Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to SUV and 4x4s.

6.6
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
86%
Wet Grip
78%
Road Feedback
84%
Handling
77%
Wear
86%
Comfort
87%
Buy again
86%
12 Reviews
83% Average
167,157 miles driven
Hankook Dynapro HP RA23

Hankook Dynapro HP RA23

Summer Premium
BETA
6.6 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 12
Avg Rating: 83.3%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.03
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Hankook Dynapro HP RA23

Questions and Answers for the Hankook Dynapro HP RA23

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Hankook Dynapro HP RA23. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 Reviews

Given 87% while driving a Vauxhall Antara (235/60 R17) on mostly country roads for 20,000 average miles
I had four of these on my Vauxhall antara now need two on the front will be replacing with the same tyres ,great grip wet or dry good ware rate and very smooth on the road
August 2, 2017
Given 77% while driving a Ford Ranger (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 0 average miles
Best tyre I have had on my Ford Ranger ever.
June 25, 2015
Given 86% while driving a Ford Kuga (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 7,000 average miles
What a surprise. Fitted to a new Kuga I was a bit wary. Most of my previous Fords have been on Continentals. The Hankook site states its a tyre designed for SUV's.
Good overall performance in wet and dry, corners well with no understeer, back end sits firmly to the tarmac. I honestly thought they would be caught out should winter really bring cold weather, but no.
This week saw our first snow and these tyres coped well, no wheel spin and started from inclines well.
On ice be careful, thats ice for you though, any tyre hates ice. The snow is on untreated rural roads as well.
They however cannot cope with mud, just a little bit has them slick. the tread pattern is not quite all seasons! Will now run them on as I was going to replace with Scorpions. Overall I am very pleased.
February 3, 2015

How would you rate the Hankook Dynapro HP RA23?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 Reviews

Given 96% while driving a Kia Motors (245/65 R17) on a combination of roads for 70,000 spirited miles
Huge surprise! Incredible tire, excelent braking and cornering in dry, good in wet, very confortable and lasted 120.000 km under a mix of conditions including a lot of trailering. Bought another set and probably would do it again, and again.
January 8, 2015
Given 89% while driving a Nissan Pathfinder (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 0 spirited miles
AT FIRST I WASN'T TO IMPRESSED UNTILL I GOT A WHEEL ALIGNMENT ,THEN OBOY I COULD NOT FAULT THEM.THERE QUIET AND THE COMFORTABLE AND GOT 42000K AND STILL HAVE 40% LEFT.SO OVERALL VERY PLEASED
November 18, 2013
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 89% while driving a Suzuki grand vitara (235/70 R16) on mostly motorways for 100 average miles
Great wear, got over 100,000kms out of these tyres on my Suzuki XL7 Grand Vitara. Overall a good tyre, much better wear than the Bridgestone Duellers that can with the vehicle. Purchased a set. Fine in snow and good on the highway.
July 20, 2013
Given 67% while driving a Hyundai Santa Fe (235/60 R18 H) on track for 25,000 average miles
The driving and braking is ok, but I don't think it's very comfortable. Seems that it'd last for some 50000 miles!
January 15, 2012
Given 88% while driving a Hyundai Santa Fe (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 0 average miles
Whisper quiet at 60% cost of Premium Brands, best price was the main dealer, I have only done a couple of hundred miles so too early to coment further but very pleased with noise level and comfort.
December 3, 2011
Given 44% while driving a Hyundai Santa Fe (235/60 R18) on a combination of roads for 27 spirited miles
This is a budget tyre, but don't be put off by that; it is comfortable and good in the dry, and if you are a gentle driver ok in the wet. My new Santa Fe came with these fitted and everything was fine until the engine was run-in and then I started travelling more quickly. In damp or wet conditions I experienced sudden and severe, and potentially terminal, understeer under power at the natural apex of tight turns (roundabouts). Being an experienced driver I'd don't recall such an extreme and without warning lack in grip. After the third extreme case of this and feeling nervous, I changed all tyres at about 7000 miles. This SUV is not meant to be thrown around too much, but in the hands of more spirited drivers these tyres can catch you out unexpectedly. I bit the bullet and switched to another Korean tyre Kumho KL12s. These ride a little harder, have less grip and drift more in the dry (marginally), but gone is the sudden without warning understeer. After 20,000 miles, this problem has vanished, push too hard and things let go gently and controllably. So if you are a push-on driver in the wet and want tyres that signal when they are about to give-up, then buy any premium tyre over the Hankooks, alternatively, for a little more than the Hankooks buy the Kumhos. Also, the Kumhos have a better looking open tread, are noisier on all surfaces, look narrower (actual tread width in contact with the road is about 10mm less), are better in wet/snow, but provide some tread block vibration/resonance through the steering. I don't think they have got the groove spacing variations quite right.
August 12, 2010
Given 90% while driving a Hyundai Santa Fe (235/65 R17) on a combination of roads for 45,000 average miles
seem to last forever...will buy again shortly as I have covered 72000 Km's
in temperatures ranging from 110 degrees fahreinheit to below freezing
July 28, 2010
Rate the Hankook Dynapro HP RA23