Menu
Sailun Ice Blazer WST3 View Gallery (1)
155-315/35-80 R13-22 93 sizes 2016 Winter rated

Sailun Ice Blazer WST3

The Sailun Ice Blazer WST3 is a Touring Winter tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

4.6
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
65%
Wet Grip
63%
Road Feedback
57%
Handling
60%
Wear
68%
Comfort
70%
Buy again
43%
Snow Grip
45%
Ice Grip
35%
4 Reviews
56% Average
43,500 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 8th)
Sailun Ice Blazer WST3

Sailun Ice Blazer WST3

Winter Economy
BETA
4.6 / 10
Based on Professional Tests · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Wet
59.9
1.93x / 3 tests
Snow
40
1.5x / 3 tests
Dry
40
1.13x / 2 tests
Ice
40
1.2x / 3 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Handling
52.6
4 tests
Braking
40.6
4 tests
Traction
40
2 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2019
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 4
Avg Rating: 56.1%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 1.14
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test Vi Bilagare 2019 225/50 R17 8/8 11 metrics
1
Tests
8th
Average
8th
Best
8th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
8th/8
Non mentioned.
Very poor grip on snow and ice, poor handling in the dry and wet.
Not recommended. Not only poor grip, but the tyres started to lose spikes in the first 80 km.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
13 inch
155/80R13 79 T E D 71
14 inch
175/65R14 86 T XL E D 71
185/70R14 92 T XL D D 71
175/65R14 86 T XL D D 71
185/60R14 82 T D D 71
15 inch
195/65R15 95 T XL D D 72
185/65R15 92 T XL D D 71
185/65R15 92 T XL D D 71
235/75R15 105 S C D 72
16 inch
205/55R16 94 T XL D D 72
205/60R16 96 T XL C D 72
215/60R16 99 T XL D D 72
215/70R16 100 T C D 72
245/75R16 111 S C D 72
17 inch
225/45R17 94 T XL D D 72
225/50R17 98 T XL D D 72
225/60R17 103 T XL C D 72
215/55R17 98 T XL D D 72
235/65R17 104 T C D 72
215/45R17 91 T XL D D 72
265/65R17 112 T C D 73
265/70R17 115 S C D 73
18 inch
225/40R18 92 H XL D D 72
235/60R18 103 T C D 72
245/40R18 97 T XL D D 72
245/45R18 100 T XL D D 72
19 inch
235/35R19 91 T XL D D 72
20 inch
275/55R20 117 T XL B D 73
255/45R20 105 T XL C C 73
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Sailun Ice Blazer WST3 >>

Questions and Answers for the Sailun Ice Blazer WST3

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Sailun Ice Blazer WST3. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Sailun Ice Blazer WST3 Reviews

Given 43% while driving a Mercedes Benz E220Cdi (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 16,000 average miles
Have them on a mercedes benz e220 RWD. I realy dont like them. I have the studded version and my review is only based on winter driving in Iceland. When driving at around 80 to 90 km/hr i will have snapp oversteer when im going up gradual hills or maby accelatating. I have had other RWD cars with yokohama studded tyres and they were mutch better and not so unpredictable. I have coverd at least 25k km and i cant wait to replace them with a premeum brand. About 70% of the studds still remain.
October 23, 2025
Given 66% while driving a Acura TSX (205/60 R17) on for 5,000 average miles
I bought these as Canadian Tire branded "Certified WinterTrek" (exact same tire made by sailun as the WST3). Overall they are fine tires in the dry and wet, but they are almost as bad as typical all-seasons in the snow/ice. The tread compound is just too hard. I'm sure they will wear well given the stiff tread, but I was hoping for better winter grip. I didn't get them studded.
I didn't even bother putting these on in the winter the past couple of years since the small increase in winter performance over my all-seasons is not worth the effort of changing tires.
Do yourself a favor - if you are not getting them studded (or like me, studs are illegal where you live), don't bother buying them. Search for real winter traction elsewhere.
November 22, 2025
Given 39% while driving a Opel Insignia B (245/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 20,000 spirited miles
Yes, these tyres brake and accelerate on snow and ice but the grip in corners is awful and dangerous, you will never know when the powerslide starts. Really dangerous tyres to drive in winter conditions. Not recommended. Save some money and buy atleast Hankooks.
January 29, 2021

How would you rate the Sailun Ice Blazer WST3?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Sailun Ice Blazer WST3 Reviews

Given 77% while driving a Audi A4 Quattro 1.9 TDI Avant (205/55 R16) on mostly country roads for 2,500 spirited miles
Firstly these tires have a version with and without studs- I use them WITH studs as that is allowed here. Secondly, I have used these tires on my previous car also for about 25 000 kilometers Thirdly all my cars are Quattro so that may change some things. I have heard quite a lot of negative feedback about these but all from small front-wheel-drive car users, don't know anyone with an RWD car so can not comment on that. For me, these are really nicely controllable tires in snow and also on ice. I do not have any experience with premium category tires but to date, these are the best I have used. I'm quite an aggressive driver in winter and I love the control over both of my cars going sideways with these tires. Also, I have never had any unpredictable or uncontrollable situation with these not going straight or in corners. Any coming slippage can be felt in and corrections can be made in advance. The suds stay nicely in place (of course after running in tires correctly of course). In my other car after 25 000 kilometers, most of the studs are still in place, there are on a tire with 6 missing and that is the worst one. The thread also looks ok and I estimate that 30 - 40 thousand kilometers can be achieved if nothing suddenly changes in the performance later one. I'm not really sure that this will help anyone but if you use an all-wheel-drive car and studs are allowed in your region I suggest to trie them out as the price are quite good in my opinion.
March 19, 2021
Rate the Sailun Ice Blazer WST3