Menu
Nankang Noble Sport NS20 View Gallery (1)
155-305/30-65 R13-22 131 sizes 2012 Winter rated

Nankang Noble Sport NS20

The Nankang Noble Sport NS20 is a High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

5.9
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
73%
Wet Grip
58%
Road Feedback
67%
Handling
61%
Wear
75%
Comfort
72%
Buy again
60%
37 Reviews
66% Average
404,420 miles driven
7 Tests (avg: 10th)
Nankang Noble Sport NS20

Nankang Noble Sport NS20

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
5.9 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Comfort
68.5
0.32x / 6 tests
Wet
59.6
2x / 16 tests
Value
52.6
0.42x / 9 tests
Dry
41.8
1.8x / 11 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Handling
48.3
12 tests
Braking
44.9
10 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 7
Publications: 5
Period: 2010 - 2020
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 37
Avg Rating: 66.4%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.34
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test Auto Bild 2020 265/35 R19 9/10 8 metrics
2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test Auto Zeitung 2020 225/50 R17 19/20 11 metrics
2018 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2018 265/35 R19 6/6 8 metrics
2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test Sport Auto 2018 265/35 R19 6/9 8 metrics
2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2018 245/30 R20 8/8 7 metrics
2015 Auto Bild Performance Tyre Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2015 275/35 R19 6/7 0 metrics
2010 European Summer Tyre Test ADAC 2010 225/45 r17 13/16 0 metrics
7
Tests
10th
Average
6th
Best
19th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
19th/20
None mentioned.
Very long braking, poor traction, and slow steering in the wet. Very high rolling resistance. Oversteer in the dry.
9th/10
High aquaplaning resistance, low price.
Dangerously long wet and dry braking, poor handling and spongy steering feel on both dry and wet surfaces, high rolling resistance.
Not Recommended.
8th/8
Quiet, low price.
Poor wet handling, long wet braking, spongy handling.

Questions and Answers for the Nankang Noble Sport NS20

Ask a question
September 22, 2016

Nankang Noble Sport NS20 is it run flat?

We do not believe Nankang make a runflat version of the NS20.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 34 user reviews

Drivers' opinions on the Nankang Noble Sport NS20 are mixed: many praise its value, comfort, low noise, and adequate dry grip for everyday use, while a significant minority report poor wet grip and vague handling at the limit. High-scoring reviews emphasize comfort, quietness, and acceptable wet performance when driven sensibly, but lower-scoring reviews frequently cite understeer and unsafe wet behavior.

Strengths
  • Good value/price
  • Comfortable ride
  • Low road noise
  • Adequate dry grip for daily driving
  • Decent tread life for some users
Areas for Improvement
  • Poor wet grip/traction
  • Understeer and vague handling at the limit
  • Noise for some users
  • Rapid wear for aggressive use

Top 3 Nankang Noble Sport NS20 Reviews

Given 49% while driving a Ford Fiesta (195/45 R16) on mostly motorways for 25,000 spirited miles
Initial impressions were very good, except for the noise. However the tyre wear wear was very pronounced, after 20k km (of to be fair quite aggresive driving) the tread depth was at the minimum markers. Performance, especially in the wet is very negatively affected as the tyre wears. All in all for the price (around 100€ a pair) no major complaints. However I have recently switched to second hand PS3s and there is no comparison, in my opinion it is worth getting used premium instead.
March 13, 2025
Given 52% while driving a Volvo V50 estate (205/50 R17) on mostly country roads for 1,100 spirited miles
For normal driving on dry roads, it is ok. Rolling recistans is little high, but not to bad.
In Rain it is bad. Very bad.
May 28, 2025
Given 82% while driving a Honda Civic 1.4 100PS FK1 (225/50 R16) on a combination of roads for 3,500 spirited miles
My previous tyres were Federal Evoluzion ST-1 which were excellent sporty tyres at a discount price. Unfortunately, the same tyres were not in stock and the only tyres at the same price point (almost 50% lower than premium brands) were the Nankangs. From previous reviews, these tyres seemed to have improve their overall performance in recent years, and thus, I decided to take the risk and try them. After 5K km, I realize that these tyres are excellent everyday tyres with good dry and wet breaking, above average wet performance and top comfort. But when it comes to sporty performance, these tyres have not enough stiff sidewall (even the extra load XL version I have) for hard cornering. Especially in my civic's stock setup, oversteer happens easily when cornering at high speeds which requires above average experience in handling. After testing different tyre pressures trying to fix this problem, I think that with 40 psi in front and 36 psi in back tyres, handling is much better and oversteer seems to be more fun than problem. In general, these Nankangs are 80% everyday - 20% sporty tyres, focusing more on everyday comfort and safety and less on sporty performance.
March 19, 2024

How would you rate the Nankang Noble Sport NS20?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Nankang Noble Sport NS20 Reviews

Given 73% while driving a Audi A4 2.0 TDi 170 S Line (255/35 R19) on mostly town for 150 average miles
Bought these as a higher end budget/low mid range tyre. Paid £220 fitted for a pair. I’m coming from a set of Hankooks which lasted me around 5 years and went with the Nankangs this time as I’m sure this is roughly what I paid for the Hankooks back in 2018. Hankooks now up to £150+ so time to try something different.

Only been on the car around a months and my initial thoughts are it’s a decent tyre.

Road noise is slightly greater than the Hankooks, however I would add that the old tyres were on the limit. I assume any new tyre with full tread will make slightly more noise than an almost bald tyre?

I did also notice that the tyre itself, despite being the same 255 width as the Hankooks, is slightly narrower, leaving the rim marginally more exposed and offering less protection. Shouldn’t be a big deal, but time will tell if this leads to more stone chips on the wheels which were recently powder coated.

Grip in the dry absolutely fine. No noticeable difference in wet grip between these and the Hankooks. In the first week of having these fitted we had freezing conditions and I never had any shakey moments. I’ll add that in’s a sensible driver with the odd spirited burst when situation/conditions allow.

I think for a daily driver on normal roads, this tyre will serve you absolutely fine. Drive to the conditions and I don’t see you finding a ditch any time soon, certainly not because of the tyres.

I only do around 4/5 thousand miles a year so I’ll be hoping to see between 4 and 5 years out of these but time will tell.
December 8, 2023
Given 73% while driving a Audi A4 2.0 TDi 170 S Line (255/35 R19) on mostly town for 150 average miles
Bought these as a higher end budget/low mid range tyre. Paid £220 fitted for a pair. I’m coming from a set of Hankooks which lasted me around 5 years and went with the Nankangs this time as I’m sure this is roughly what I paid for the Hankooks back in 2018. Hankooks now up to £150+ so time to try something different.

Only been on the car around a months and my initial thoughts are it’s a decent tyre.

Road noise is slightly greater than the Hankooks, however I would add that the old tyres were on the limit. I assume any new tyre with full tread will make slightly more noise than an almost bald tyre?

I did also notice that the tyre itself, despite being the same 255 width as the Hankooks, is slightly narrower, leaving the rim marginally more exposed and offering less protection. Shouldn’t be a big deal, but time will tell if this leads to more stone chips on the wheels which were recently powder coated.

Grip in the dry absolutely fine. No noticeable difference in wet grip between these and the Hankooks. In the first week of having these fitted we had freezing conditions and I never had any shakey moments. I’ll add that in’s a sensible driver with the odd spirited burst when situation/conditions allow.

I think for a daily driver on normal roads, this tyre will serve you absolutely fine. Drive to the conditions and I don’t see you finding a ditch any time soon, certainly not because of the tyres.

I only do around 4/5 thousand miles a year so I’ll be hoping to see between 4 and 5 years out of these but time will tell.
December 7, 2023
Given 80% while driving a Renault (235/35 R19) on mostly town for 5,000 average miles
I purchased a set of four Nankang NS-20's for my Megane RS Trophy and I can hear all the Megane Sport Owners crying out saying "You should have bought Michelin!!" however I have tried various different tyres on my RS Trophy having owned two cars and the Nankang's are quite a surprise. Firstly the price. Online you can get these for around £100 a tyre. Compare this to Michelin Sport and you are easily looking at £250 a tyre!. I had a set of Nankangs on my previous RS Trophy and managed to easily get around 10K miles out of them, probably more if I drove more like James May. The NS-20's handle well on my RS Trophy for day to day driving. I don't go on track so a set of 4 tyres for £400 is a bargain. Handling and Road feedback is very good. I hadn't noticed that much difference in all honesty between these and the Bridgestone ones that came with the car brand new. These Nankang's also are good grip and I hadn't noticed hardly any understeer as some other drivers had mentioned with their reviews. These tyres also look very smart on the car especially when Autogylm tyre wet shine is applied to them .

Overall I am very pleased and with cost of living taking a bite these alternative tyres are a good option compared to the most expensive tyres out there.
July 8, 2023
Given 83% while driving a Ford 05 Mondeo 185 (modded) diesel (205/40 R17) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
If you read up about these tyres, you’ll find a lot of unsavoury reviews. However they all seem to be from some time ago and I’m wondering if they’ve changed the compound or something in recent years. I’ve just come from a set of Michelin PS4 tyres on my Fiesta ST, fantastic tyres, but longevity is not their strong suit and they are very very expensive. So I thought about giving these a go as these are less than 50% of the cost of a set of PS5s now. So far I am very very happy with them. Not so much road noise, great grip in the dry with decent feedback, not quite as good as the Michelins but pretty close. Wet grip is absolutely fine, you drive to the conditions anyway but i feel confident it’s not going to fling me off the road. Decent with standing water too. Overall I am very impressed with these especially considering the price, I do wonder about all the negative reviews and their ability to drive their cars according to the conditions! But I would definitely recommend these after about 2000 miles.
October 11, 2022
Given 51% while driving a Mazda Mazda2 Sport (195/45 R15) on a combination of roads for 1,000 spirited miles
Had these fitted to my Mazda2 when I purchased it. Very cheap tyre and performance reflects this. Tyre had maybe a third of its life left so my review will reflect I drove this at its worst. Dry grip okay. Better than other budget passenger tyres. Could get some speed of of it but with great difficulty. Steering response is vague and inaccurate. This combined with lack of feedback at the limit made these quite tricky as there was no real warning when these would let go. I would get understeer and snap oversteer with harder cornering. Luckily Mazda's stability control kept me safe. They were very greasy on damp roads but as they were near end of life this is to be expected. Comfort was very good for a performance tyre. They were quiet and compliant. All in all this tyre is probably for someone who would normally buy the cheapest tyre possible and call it a day. They really feel like passenger tyres masquerading as performance tyres. Fine considering price point but don't expect this to be a cheap alternative to PS4 GYA5 etc.
October 17, 2021
Given 61% while driving a Suzuki swift sport (195/50 R16) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
But these tyres as a replacement for Yokohamas which came with my car when I bought it used. Initially on the fronts, then at the rear. Dry grip is pretty average, not at all darty even for a light suzuki swift. Wet grip is even worse and you can find yourself in some pretty gnarly situations if you're not careful. Especially longitudinal grip, these won't grip very well in the wet from a dig. Comfort however is pretty good and they haven't worn down that much for the time I've used them. Got them at a fairly decent price, and tyre prices are pretty bad where I'm from. These tyres definitely haven't worn down as fast as the tyres they replaced but they also don't offer the same performance.
October 12, 2021
Given 41% while driving a Nissan 200sx (235/40 R17) on mostly motorways for 450 spirited miles
Bought set of 4 of these. Already in first mile on they started to shake... Then i balanced them couple time and drived 450miles. Then shaking was crazy, i checked tyres and all tyres had collapsed belts inside. Tyres had 2-3 big collapses and almost 10mm of out roundness. Only one tyre had "flat spot" collapse, 3 other was like egg shaped. Checked wheels and worst wheel had 0.2mm sideway and 0.3mm longitunal out of roundness, so wheels are perfect. Older Nankang NS2 was ok tyres (bought these 3 sets long time ago), these NS20 are so rubbish that i wont never buy _anything_ Nankang ever again. Handling was really bad, tyres flex like crazy in corners. Wet grip is really 0/10. Its better drive summer tyres in winter than these in wet summer. Plus side, these was like new at 450miles. They even shine on threads. :D Don't ever buy these!
April 18, 2021
Given 80% while driving a Holden Commodore VE (245/45 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 45,000 spirited miles
They were a good tyre suited the mixed driving that was done on them very well. Nothing too aggressive in their life as they were only on public roads. Right up until the replacement where sure footed in the dry, in the wet so long as you keep smooth loading they never missed a beat. Under two mm of tread in the wet they could with very little provocation let loose in the wet, too heavy footed through intersections etc.
August 4, 2020
Given 17% while driving a Jaguar XK8 (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 3,000 average miles
The tires were fitted on my Jaguar XK8 when i bought it.
They are absolutely terrible. They give no confidence at all going into turns. Driving in the wet is like driving in snow. The steering feels vague.
These tires might be ok for city driving but not confident of breaking distance.
I had them for 3 months and swapped them for Pirelli P Zeros. The difference is staggering.
Don't buy Nankang NS20 for a performance car ever. They are dangerous.
June 17, 2019
Given 100% while driving a Mercedes Benz C63 AMG (255/35 R18 W) on mostly country roads for 9,000 spirited miles
These were already fitted when I purchased the car from a dealership. Initially I thought get them off & fit approved tyres but kept putting it off until here I am almost 3 years later & looking to fit a new set because told the rears have maybe another 2000 miles. That would mean these have lasted about 11000 miles which is not too shabby for this car at all. How have they been? Tremendous. OK I am not a high miler but I do tend to drive with lead boots & the roads around here a twisty. Not in the best shape either. Do like to go for it when it is safe to do so. Have to say these tyres have never let me down. I have never felt the car getting away from me. It has always remain planted. Road noise? Are you kidding? The lovewly sound of that naturally aspirated V8 engine/exhaust drowns all that out thank god!
April 19, 2019
Given 86% while driving a Vauxhall Vectra Estate (215/55 R17) on mostly country roads for 8,000 miles
I got rid of a van which was not really being used to it's potential in my business and went back to using an estate car as I did years previous.
A sub £1000 Vectra SRi fitted the bill , great car in great condition on a 57 plate on a small budget....never really thought about fun whilst driving from job to job, but after a few back road blasts it became very apparent that the vectra estate( quite a lardy car despite the SRi branding) was actually pretty dam grippy and balanced to a degree that left me quite shocked.No doubting that the chassis must take some praise as it's stiff and well damped, but
The tires fitted we're non other than these Nankang NS20,s and the lateral g you can generate is quite astounding for what is a cheap sports tire.
My plaything car is a modfified RX8 running on Kuhmo KU36,s, worked suspension too and if I was driving against myself in both vehicles I would not be feeling like the poor cousin on the Nankangs....they install quite a bit of confidence, seem stiff on the sidewalls and grip tenaciously.They run quiet too
I would buy again for sure..and will soon.
I recommend highley, budget driven or not.
July 31, 2018
Given 90% while driving a BMW 740i G11 (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 500 spirited miles
740i G11, staggered 245/40-20 front and 275/35-20 rear. Quiet, stable, and far more comfortable than the OE run-flat Bridgestone Potenza. Near equivalent dry grip as the OE Potenza, but the cornering isn't as precise (these tires do stick), but little more corrections are necessary sometimes. The only complaint is at speed over 100mph, these tires become a little floaty and slightly louder compare to the OE Potenza. Overall, I'm very pleased with how well Nankang NS-20 tires handle the weight and speed of this vehicle. Haven't had a chance to drive on wet surface yet. Fine tires from Nankang, Republic of China.
June 24, 2017
Rate the Nankang Noble Sport NS20