Michelin Energy Saver Reviews - Page 2

Given 54% while driving a Hyundai Ioniq (195/65 R15) on mostly town for 25,000 average miles
For fuel saving, it did great job. However, not fun, grip and feedback not good. Noisy after 10k.
Helpful 9 - tyre reviewed on August 20, 2020
Given 77% while driving a BMW F30 320D (205/60 R16 H) on a combination of roads for 20,000 spirited miles
I have these tyres for 3 years now on my summer wheels. They are ok for most drivers, but they are quite bad on wet surfaces when it’s below 15 Celsius. They also feel a bit unsecure at higher speeds (over 160 kph - 100 mph). My Skoda Octavia with Goodyear Eagle F1 gsd3 feels a lot better at high speeds than the 3series with Michelin Energy Saver. The fuel economy compared to the winter tyres that I use (Goodyear ultragrip 8) is not so different. Probably 0.2 l/100km less on the Energy Saver. During colder mornings the back of my car goes sideways quite fast if I accelerate a bit harder. Conclusion: I will go for other tires next season.
Helpful 8 - tyre reviewed on August 9, 2020
Given 45% while driving a Volkswagen Polo 6N (215/65 R16) on for 100 miles
It is the worst tire that I have ever used. It came with VW Polo stock, and I ve changed them Continental All Season. Michelin Energy saver is especially bad on wet roads in both ways handling and braking. I do not recommend this tire
Helpful 6 - tyre reviewed on April 27, 2020
What to know the BEST All Season Tyres for 2023? Click to find out!
Given 66% while driving a Volvo V60 D2 (205/60 R16) on mostly town for 100,000 average miles
Tires are quite good, they last more than other brands, but tread deterioration tend to appear after 50% of the usable tire.
Helpful 5 - tyre reviewed on January 24, 2020
Given 55% while driving a Toyota Corolla Altis (205/65 R15) on mostly town for 0 easy going miles
I am driving Toyota Grande 2015 model 1.8cvti, I had Michelin Xm2 before and drove upto 85000 kms, after having feedback about the tires i decided to switch to michelin every savor plus and i ordered it, i was surprised the experience that there was no new tyre feel in it. i can feel even low bumps on the road plus noise was too loud for me adding another kind of roaring sound. i checked the alignment and then checked them again but noise was there. I am not so satisfied from them i returned it to the shop and now thinking to move to Continental CC6 or Yokohama advan db.
Helpful 8 - tyre reviewed on January 9, 2020
Given 83% while driving a Ford Focus MK3 (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 4,200 spirited miles
Positives: very economical, good handling and feedback, low noise, good stability at high speed, but these are not sporty tires, if pushed hard in the corners they will squeal and loose grip if the clutch is dropped too sudden.
Also, abysmal on unpaved rods with a little water and mud on them.
Definitely excellent tyres for economical driving on good roads.
Helpful 5 - tyre reviewed on November 13, 2019
Given 69% while driving a Hyundai i20 (195/55 R16 H) on mostly town for 13,500 average miles
Will not be using these Michelin Energy Saver Tyres again !
Although the handling is good, the fuel performance is very poor
Not surprising as it’s rated ‘E’ but how can energy saver tyres have a fuel rating of ‘E’ ?

Will swap for Michelin CrossClimates plus with a ‘A’ fuel rating next
Helpful 5 - tyre reviewed on November 10, 2019
Given 80% while driving a Honda Civic 1.8 (195/65 R15 H) on mostly town for 50,000 spirited miles
Even on a hot summer afternoon, you won't hear these tyres screech while taking a sharp U-turn. My set of tyres lasted for 80,000KMs, still had some thread left but they had become hard. The grip with these tyres on a cold winter morning is not very good. However, comfort level is good.
Helpful 8 - tyre reviewed on October 19, 2019
Given 46% while driving a Honda 1.6 I DTEC (180/60 R15 H) on a combination of roads for 15,000 easy going miles
The dry grip is good, in the wet the tyre can let go quite quickly. The main issue is that all 4 tyres developed tiny cracks on the edges after just over 2 years and 15k miles. The front two were really bad so it was MOT failure. So with 5mm front/6mm rear they had to be replaced.
Helpful 7 - tyre reviewed on August 18, 2019
Given 93% while driving a Peugeot 407 4 door sedan 2.0 petrol (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 70,000 average miles
Simply the best. Tyres at the back have done 100k plus now and are still in acceptable state.
Helpful 6 - tyre reviewed on July 15, 2019
Given 99% while driving a Toyota Auris (195/65 R15 T) on a combination of roads for 18,000 easy going miles
The tyres were fitted in early March 2017and the results were very good. Superb dry and wet grip (tarmac and gravel), fuel economy is great and the noise is low. Very good summer tyres overall, I think they have left about ~15000 miles. Would recommend and buy again.
Helpful 5 - tyre reviewed on May 15, 2019
Given 90% while driving a Volkswagen mk7 Golf GTD (195/65 R15 H) on mostly motorways for 32,000 average miles
I have done 32,000 miles using these tyres so far. Probably another 3,000 miles to go before i change them
Helpful 12 - tyre reviewed on April 7, 2019