Menu
Sailun Atrezzo ZSR View Gallery (1)
195-275/30-55 R15-20 104 sizes 2016

Sailun Atrezzo ZSR

Sailun Tyres Ultra High Performance Summer Next

The Sailun Atrezzo ZSR is a Ultra High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

1.2
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
80%
Wet Grip
68%
Road Feedback
70%
Handling
73%
Wear
67%
Comfort
71%
Buy again
73%
47 Reviews
72% Average
369,579 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 48th)
Sailun Atrezzo ZSR

Sailun Atrezzo ZSR

Summer Economy
BETA
1.2 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Category Scores
Dry
54.7
1.8x / 1 test
Wet
46.7
2x / 1 test
Cross-Category Performance

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
50.4
2 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2019
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 47
Avg Rating: 72%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.64
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 48/45 2 metrics
All Tests
View Test Results
1
Tests
48th
Average
48th
Best
48th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout
225/45 R17 • 2019
48th/45

Questions and Answers for the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR

Ask a question
October 1, 2020

Wwe need 2 new tires for 2014 Mazda 6 saloon-auto. 2 need replacing are front 1 x Nexan and 1 x M fera sui other 2 on back are Bridgestone and ok Is the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR ok for this do you think. Tend to only do about 6 thousand miles a year and nolong drives for the most.

The Sailun Atrezzo ZSR was tested in 2019 and had very poor wet braking, so it is not a tyre I can recommend.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 43 user reviews

Most drivers find the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR delivers strong value with solid dry grip, acceptable wet performance if not pushed, low-to-moderate noise, and decent comfort, often comparing it favorably to pricier brands. However, a notable minority report fast tread wear-especially on driven axles-and inconsistent or weak wet grip, with a few citing defects or pressure/steering issues. Considering the score mix, sentiment is moderately positive, with budget value and everyday usability leading, while wear and wet grip are the main drawbacks.

Strengths
  • Good dry grip
  • Good value for money
  • Acceptable/low noise
  • Comfortable ride
  • Handles well for daily use
Areas for Improvement
  • High/fast tread wear
  • Inconsistent/weak wet grip
  • Occasional noise increase with speed or age

Top 3 Sailun Atrezzo ZSR Reviews

Given 45% while driving a Land Rover Freelander 2 (235/60 R18) on mostly town for 3,000 average miles
Halfords fitted 2 new tyres 9th July. 2,800 miles later in 9 weeks the tyres have worn to 3mm all over and the wires are showing on some parts.
Both front tyres, both completely worn out. Halfords refuse to consider the tyres may be faulty
Ask a question | Helpful 938
September 17, 2024
Given 63% while driving a Vauxhall Corsa D (215/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 20,000 spirited miles
I have a bit mixed impression relating to Sailun ZSR tyres. They offer surprisingly good grip on dry tarmac, even if cornering hard, but can be inconsistent on wet roads, especially on smooth tarmac. They are acceptably noisy. Rolling resistance can be noticed at petrol station. But still within acceptance. It could be a cheap and good tyre, unfortunately high wear level is pulling down overall impression because 20k miles does not impress at all - near legal limit already. But to be honest, I have seen worse results at much higher price. Would I buy these again? I would consider for just rolling wheels for sure, but not for the pulling wheels.
Ask a question | Helpful 799
November 20, 2024
Given 34% while driving a Vauxhall INSIGNIA 1.8 PETROL (225/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 6,000 average miles
Terrible! unless you are thinking about fitting these to a go-cart then think again. Terrible grip in wet, poor handling and have worn to their limit in less than 10,000 miles.
Ask a question | Helpful 830
June 15, 2024
Have you driven on the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Sailun Atrezzo ZSR >

Latest Sailun Atrezzo ZSR Reviews

Given 53% while driving a Opel Astra J GTC (235/50 R18) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
Excellent braking on both dry and wet roads. Quiet driving. This is a big plus.

Unfortunately, the steering response is pathetic. Also, the steering is very poor in corners. Also, the tires do not hold air pressure. It's good that I got a few defective 2025 tires and I returned them, changed them to another manufacturer.
Ask a question | Helpful 285
September 26, 2025
Given 70% while driving a Mitsubishi Lancer Evo VII (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 spirited miles
Honestly, out of many of these economy tyres, the ZSR actually is quite good. On my 2nd set on one car and first on another. On an AWD car the grip is actually quite good. No sliding, no unreasonable understeer unless the car is setup badly alignment or pressure wise. In the wet, it handles quite good, but it's no high end performance.. if you plan to push hard on wet country roads, they'll complain, yet handle, but not for some speeds. Even in FWD, they handle quite well. And at this price point, it doesn't hurt if the tyre needs replacing. They behave fairly well even as they age also. In 5 years the first set I had Lasted a couple Autocross events as well as the average drive, with no issues of losing control. Of course everyone will have different views, however I've found them to be great.
Ask a question | Helpful 805
June 19, 2024
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 71% while driving a Holden 2000 VT Berlina Supercharged (245/40 R17) on a combination of roads for 15,000 spirited miles
Great performance for the price, never had an issue wet or dry. Excellent budget choice, however the wear was on the higher side. I can’t imagine how these other people are driving…
Ask a question | Helpful 1155
April 27, 2023
Given 74% while driving a Kia Motors Stinger GTS (225/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 30 average miles
I'm really positively surprised with this Tyres. I got them for a really good price with 2 years warranty which encouraged me to try them as I was on tight budget. Now after 16 months and approximately 31,000 miles (50,000 KM) I can say it's over perform it's price. I live in a very Hot area and this last year was a mixture of extreme hot ( 50°) and a heavy rains in some occasions and I became confident in the Tyres and the grip I get from. I would buy again for sure and my advice is if you are budget sensitive or you just want something for specific situation just get these Tyres.
Ask a question | Helpful 829
October 10, 2022
Given 56% while driving a Mercedes Benz E430 (265/35 R18) on a combination of roads for 13,000 average miles
MB W210 E430 V8. Driven approx. 20,000km in normal driving style and already have rear tires with a 3mm tread. Considering the width of the tire, wear is very fast. Rolling noise starts to increase significantly at 100 kmh on the highway and is quite audible. Definitely not suitable for sporty driving. Suitable for a calm driving enthusiast. Considering the price of the tire, you get exactly what you paid for (a little more). I decided to try Falken Azensis FK510 tires. Let's see if it lasts longer (about 2 times more expensive too)
Ask a question | Helpful 864
June 9, 2022
Given 78% while driving a BMW 330d (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
Comparably they have feedback like my older tires Toyo Proxes Sport from 2020. A lot quieter in lower speeds though and also ride comfort is better. Dry grip and braking distance is alright, I get lose tail in the wet on RWD E91 330D, which is alright too :D. Hope they keep feeling like that after few thousand miles.
Ask a question | Helpful 817
March 24, 2022
Given 53% while driving a Ford BA GT Falcon (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 2,000 average miles
The tyres seemed ok cheap enough except one delaminated pretty bad, luckily it didn't blow. Was able to get a new one under warranty on pro rata. I think i'll try another brand next time.
Ask a question | Helpful 858
March 18, 2022
Given 70% while driving a BMW 325ci M Sport convertible (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 30 spirited miles
For the price offered it is a decent tyre. I was abit sceptical because fhese are made in China. Road holding is ok, breaking disfance also as long as you dont push them. Lasted quite alot too.
Ask a question | Helpful 916
February 21, 2022
Given 64% while driving a BMW 520i (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 15,000 spirited miles
Very good tyres for money with some troubles in wet. High wear...
Ask a question | Helpful 1096
November 22, 2021
Given 70% while driving a BMW 520i (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Not bad tyre but wars very fast
Ask a question | Helpful 883
November 14, 2021
Given 17% while driving a Peugeot 308 (225/40 R18) on mostly motorways for 1,000 average miles
Terrible ditch finders .where on the car when I brought it and only on the rear axel. Found the tail of the car getting out of shape sixty mph on a section of the A6 where I live I could feel myself sliding towards the kirb. Shocking how anyone would put these on a warm hatchback let alone how they get away with selling them for the UK market replaced with michelin-tyres feels so much safer
Ask a question | Helpful 959
September 14, 2021
Mazda (215/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
I have been using sailun tires on two of my cars since 1 2017 and i am very happy with them. They perform just as good as the Dunlops I was previously using
Ask a question | Helpful 907
September 10, 2021