Yokohama iceGUARD iG65

The Yokohama iceGUARD iG65 is a Premium Touring Winter tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

Tyre review data from 3 tyre reviews averaging 59% over 32,000 miles driven, and 1 tests with an average result of 6th.

Dry Grip 75%
Wet Grip 50%
Road Feedback 50%
Handling 60%
Wear 80%
Comfort 75%
Buy again 25%
Snow Grip 45%
Ice Grip 75%

The iceGUARD iG65 is ranked 63rd of 66 Winter Premium Touring tyres.

Tests Included

1

Best Result

6th

Worst Result

6th

Average Result

6th

Latest Tyre Test Results

2018 Vi Studded Winter Tyre Test
6th of 8 tyres
  • Short braking distances in the wet.
  • High noise, poor snow and ice handling.
View Full Test >>

2018 Tyre Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any label data for the Yokohama iceGUARD iG65

Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Yokohama iceGUARD iG65. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!

Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

capatha

To verify you're human please type the word you see above in the box below.


Top 3 Yokohama iceGUARD iG65 Reviews

Toyota (205/55 R16 Q) on mostly country roads for 5,000 average miles
I want to try nordic tyres instead of european winter tyres, so this was the reason why I bought Yokohama IceGuard. Compared to the tyres from the past ( michelin A6, continental TS830, nokian w...) you can feel the difference from the first kilometer. Thy tyre is not designed for wet/dry/hot but the handling is still better then some budget class tyres, but when the real winter begins, then you can feel the difference, if you live close to the mountains or in countryside, where you have only 2-3class roads, then I suggest you to try...
Helpful 114 - tyre reviewed on January 16, 2021
Given 67% while driving a Peugeot 3008 1,5 Diesel (225/55 R18) on mostly town for 12,000 average miles
Not particular good in snow. Rather low grip in snow but much better on icy roads.
Helpful 26 - tyre reviewed on February 14, 2022
Given 52% while driving a Honda Civic 1.5T (215/55 R16) on mostly town for 15,000 spirited miles
I've had these fitted, now, for three Canadian winters. Consider this a mid-life/end-life review (depending if I toss them early). Snow? They're ok. Reasonable grip, reasonable clearing capability from snow/slush building in the treads. Ice? Surprisingly ok. For a winter-rated rubber, they're "as-expected". Ice really isn't fun to drive on, I've never really been caught offguard by ice on the roads, so I'd actually consider these to be pretty decent here. Dry? Mediocre-to-bad. On dry cold roads, the car slides and moves more than it should. Aggressive (or, spirited) driving is heavily discouraged by the Yokohamas and they will give-way quickly. Wet? Downright dangerous. These have got got to be one of the worst sets of rubber on a car for damp/wet/rainy/slush weather that I've ever experienced. Other comfort related notes: these tires wander in grooved pavement and brushed concrete surfaces and generally make the car feel unsettled. They provide little-to-no feedback from the front end which is exasperated by the wandering. I would not purchase again. Winter tires need to be capable in a wide range of weather from ice & snow, to wet & slush as the temperatures rise before you swap over to all-season/summer tires. The lack of traction in the rain is absolutely horrendously dangerous and forces you to drive so cautiously that you'd think you'd be on proper ice. Thankfully (or oddly) the traction in the wet, whilst braking, is not as bad as it is for acceleration/turning.
Helpful 24 - tyre reviewed on February 22, 2022
Have you driven on the Yokohama iceGUARD iG65 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Yokohama iceGUARD iG65? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Yokohama iceGUARD iG65 >

Latest Yokohama iceGUARD iG65 Reviews