Test Publication:
Motor
225/55 R17
10 tyres
4 categories
Test Size:
225/55 R17
Tyres Tested:
10 tyres
Motor is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, Tyre Reviews. This is independent editorial coverage of their published test.
Published a later than usual due to covid travel restrictions, the Polish magazine "Motor" have tested ten 225/55 R17 summer tyres in the usual array of wet and dry testing.
The 17 inch size tested can be found on a wide range of vehicles, such as the Audi A6, BMW 5-Series, and Mercedes E-Class, smaller vehicles like the BMW 3-Series and Mini Countryman, crossovers like the Honda CR-V, Nissan X-Trail and Skoda Karoq, and even minivans / people carriers like the Chrysler Voyager, Fiat Scudo and Opel Vivaro.
Motor Magazine used a BMW 5 Series for the testing.
Dry
As with most tests including the Continental PremiumContact 6, the German tyre did exceptionally well in the dry, having the shortest dry braking, fastest dry handling lap and the best subjective dry handling feeling. The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 kept the Continental honest in the braking and the timed lap, and the Nokian PowerProof, Bridgestone Turanza T005 and Laufenn S Fit EQ+ performed well.
Unfortunately while the Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue was rated as one of the best tyres in the dry subjectively, it had a lack of grip in braking and handling.
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Nokian PowerProof
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Debica Presto UHP2
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue
- Imperial Ecosport 2
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Nokian PowerProof
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Imperial Ecosport 2
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue
- Debica Presto UHP2
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Nokian PowerProof
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Imperial Ecosport 2
- Debica Presto UHP2
Wet
The wet grip tests had a very similar order to dry, with the Continental tyre leading the Goodyear in both braking and handling tests, the Nokian and Bridgestone also performing well, and the Pirelli having a surprisingly disappointing result for a premium tyre.
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Nokian PowerProof
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Debica Presto UHP2
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue
- Imperial Ecosport 2
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Debica Presto UHP2
- Nokian PowerProof
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Imperial Ecosport 2
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue
The deep water straight aquaplaning test had a surprise win for the Imperial EcoSport 2 budget tyre, where as the Goodyear proved best in curved aquaplaning.
On balance, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 had the best balance between the shallow and deep water testing.
- Imperial Ecosport 2
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Nokian PowerProof
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Debica Presto UHP2
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Nokian PowerProof
- Imperial Ecosport 2
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Debica Presto UHP2
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Continental Premium Contact 6
Environment
As we've found in the Tyre Reviews tests, the Nokian Powerproof and Continental PremiumContact 6 sit at opposite ends of the external noise tests.
- Nokian PowerProof
- Debica Presto UHP2
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue
- Imperial Ecosport 2
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Continental Premium Contact 6
The rolling resistance test perhaps highlights why Pirelli struggled in the grip tests, as the P7 Blue has a significantly lower rolling resistance than even the Bridgestone Turanza T005, which usually has the lowest rolling resistance on test.
Unsurprisingly the budget tyre is the cheapest tyre on test, with the Pirelli tyre offsetting it's low fuel use with a very high purchase price!
- Imperial Ecosport 2
- Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Debica Presto UHP2
- Nokian PowerProof
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Continental Premium Contact 6
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue
Results
High level of safety and comfort, stable dry behavior, high grip and good wet stability.
Relatively low resistance to aquaplaning.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
1st |
34.5 M |
|
|
100% |
| Dry Handling |
1st |
56.1 s |
|
|
100% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
1st |
7 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
1st |
48.1 M |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Handling |
1st |
87.2 s |
|
|
100% |
| Straight Aqua |
8th |
94.01 Km/H |
98.1 Km/H |
-4.09 Km/H |
95.83% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
10th |
2.64 m/sec2 |
3.43 m/sec2 |
-0.79 m/sec2 |
76.97% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
10th |
72.9 dB |
70.6 dB |
+2.3 dB |
96.84% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
9th |
572 |
234 |
+338 |
40.91% |
| Rolling Resistance |
5th |
7.96 kg / t |
6.6 kg / t |
+1.36 kg / t |
82.91% |
Good handling and short braking distances on dry and wet roads, good aquaplaning resistance.
High rolling resistance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
2nd |
34.9 M |
34.5 M |
+0.4 M |
98.85% |
| Dry Handling |
2nd |
56.2 s |
56.1 s |
+0.1 s |
99.82% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
8th |
6.4 Points |
7 Points |
-0.6 Points |
91.43% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
2nd |
49.3 M |
48.1 M |
+1.2 M |
97.57% |
| Wet Handling |
2nd |
88.5 s |
87.2 s |
+1.3 s |
98.53% |
| Straight Aqua |
4th |
94.8 Km/H |
98.1 Km/H |
-3.3 Km/H |
96.64% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
1st |
3.43 m/sec2 |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
7th |
71.3 dB |
70.6 dB |
+0.7 dB |
99.02% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
6th |
508 |
234 |
+274 |
46.06% |
| Rolling Resistance |
9th |
8.85 kg / t |
6.6 kg / t |
+2.25 kg / t |
74.58% |
Good performance on dry and wet surfaces, low noise level, well priced.
High rolling resistance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
3rd |
35.3 M |
34.5 M |
+0.8 M |
97.73% |
| Dry Handling |
5th |
57 s |
56.1 s |
+0.9 s |
98.42% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
5th |
6.5 Points |
7 Points |
-0.5 Points |
92.86% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
3rd |
50.3 M |
48.1 M |
+2.2 M |
95.63% |
| Wet Handling |
5th |
90.4 s |
87.2 s |
+3.2 s |
96.46% |
| Straight Aqua |
3rd |
94.94 Km/H |
98.1 Km/H |
-3.16 Km/H |
96.78% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
3rd |
3.27 m/sec2 |
3.43 m/sec2 |
-0.16 m/sec2 |
95.34% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
1st |
70.6 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
5th |
452 |
234 |
+218 |
51.77% |
| Rolling Resistance |
7th |
8.18 kg / t |
6.6 kg / t |
+1.58 kg / t |
80.68% |
Good handling on dry and wet surfaces, low rolling resistance.
High externa noise.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
4th |
35.5 M |
34.5 M |
+1 M |
97.18% |
| Dry Handling |
3rd |
56.8 s |
56.1 s |
+0.7 s |
98.77% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
4th |
6.55 Points |
7 Points |
-0.45 Points |
93.57% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
4th |
51.2 M |
48.1 M |
+3.1 M |
93.95% |
| Wet Handling |
4th |
90 s |
87.2 s |
+2.8 s |
96.89% |
| Straight Aqua |
4th |
94.8 Km/H |
98.1 Km/H |
-3.3 Km/H |
96.64% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
5th |
3.22 m/sec2 |
3.43 m/sec2 |
-0.21 m/sec2 |
93.88% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
9th |
72 dB |
70.6 dB |
+1.4 dB |
98.06% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
8th |
546 |
234 |
+312 |
42.86% |
| Rolling Resistance |
2nd |
7.12 kg / t |
6.6 kg / t |
+0.52 kg / t |
92.7% |
Good handling in all conditions (light understeer appears in high-speed corners on wet surfaces, but overall the tires provide a fairly high level of grip), good level of comfort, high resistance to aquaplaning.
High rolling resistance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
4th |
35.5 M |
34.5 M |
+1 M |
97.18% |
| Dry Handling |
6th |
57.2 s |
56.1 s |
+1.1 s |
98.08% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
5th |
6.5 Points |
7 Points |
-0.5 Points |
92.86% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
6th |
51.9 M |
48.1 M |
+3.8 M |
92.68% |
| Wet Handling |
3rd |
89.7 s |
87.2 s |
+2.5 s |
97.21% |
| Straight Aqua |
2nd |
95.19 Km/H |
98.1 Km/H |
-2.91 Km/H |
97.03% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
2nd |
3.39 m/sec2 |
3.43 m/sec2 |
-0.04 m/sec2 |
98.83% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
8th |
71.5 dB |
70.6 dB |
+0.9 dB |
98.74% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
7th |
525 |
234 |
+291 |
44.57% |
| Rolling Resistance |
8th |
8.2 kg / t |
6.6 kg / t |
+1.6 kg / t |
80.49% |
Good balance of performance, good handling on dry and wet surfaces (although there is a slight tendency to understeer), well priced.
Long dry braking.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
8th |
36.1 M |
34.5 M |
+1.6 M |
95.57% |
| Dry Handling |
6th |
57.2 s |
56.1 s |
+1.1 s |
98.08% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
5th |
6.5 Points |
7 Points |
-0.5 Points |
92.86% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
5th |
51.3 M |
48.1 M |
+3.2 M |
93.76% |
| Wet Handling |
5th |
90.4 s |
87.2 s |
+3.2 s |
96.46% |
| Straight Aqua |
6th |
94.4 Km/H |
98.1 Km/H |
-3.7 Km/H |
96.23% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
7th |
3.09 m/sec2 |
3.43 m/sec2 |
-0.34 m/sec2 |
90.09% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
3rd |
70.8 dB |
70.6 dB |
+0.2 dB |
99.72% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
3rd |
376 |
234 |
+142 |
62.23% |
| Rolling Resistance |
6th |
8.12 kg / t |
6.6 kg / t |
+1.52 kg / t |
81.28% |
Acceptable performance on dry and wet surfaces, good balance of performance, low noise level, low rolling resistance
Slow dry handling lap.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
6th |
35.6 M |
34.5 M |
+1.1 M |
96.91% |
| Dry Handling |
9th |
57.6 s |
56.1 s |
+1.5 s |
97.4% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
10th |
6.25 Points |
7 Points |
-0.75 Points |
89.29% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
8th |
53.8 M |
48.1 M |
+5.7 M |
89.41% |
| Wet Handling |
5th |
90.4 s |
87.2 s |
+3.2 s |
96.46% |
| Straight Aqua |
7th |
94.11 Km/H |
98.1 Km/H |
-3.99 Km/H |
95.93% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
6th |
3.17 m/sec2 |
3.43 m/sec2 |
-0.26 m/sec2 |
92.42% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
2nd |
70.7 dB |
70.6 dB |
+0.1 dB |
99.86% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
4th |
390 |
234 |
+156 |
60% |
| Rolling Resistance |
3rd |
7.76 kg / t |
6.6 kg / t |
+1.16 kg / t |
85.05% |
Acceptable dry results, relatively low rolling resistance.
Long wet braking, poor aquaplaning resistance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
7th |
35.9 M |
34.5 M |
+1.4 M |
96.1% |
| Dry Handling |
4th |
56.9 s |
56.1 s |
+0.8 s |
98.59% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
2nd |
6.7 Points |
7 Points |
-0.3 Points |
95.71% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
7th |
53.7 M |
48.1 M |
+5.6 M |
89.57% |
| Wet Handling |
8th |
93.6 s |
87.2 s |
+6.4 s |
93.16% |
| Straight Aqua |
10th |
92.29 Km/H |
98.1 Km/H |
-5.81 Km/H |
94.08% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
9th |
2.78 m/sec2 |
3.43 m/sec2 |
-0.65 m/sec2 |
81.05% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
6th |
71.1 dB |
70.6 dB |
+0.5 dB |
99.3% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
2nd |
319 |
234 |
+85 |
73.35% |
| Rolling Resistance |
3rd |
7.76 kg / t |
6.6 kg / t |
+1.16 kg / t |
85.05% |
Very low rolling resistance.
Long braking distances and poor handling on dry and wet surfaces, relatively low resistance to aquaplaning, high price.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
9th |
37.1 M |
34.5 M |
+2.6 M |
92.99% |
| Dry Handling |
9th |
57.6 s |
56.1 s |
+1.5 s |
97.4% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
2nd |
6.7 Points |
7 Points |
-0.3 Points |
95.71% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
9th |
56.4 M |
48.1 M |
+8.3 M |
85.28% |
| Wet Handling |
10th |
94.8 s |
87.2 s |
+7.6 s |
91.98% |
| Straight Aqua |
9th |
92.82 Km/H |
98.1 Km/H |
-5.28 Km/H |
94.62% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
8th |
2.82 m/sec2 |
3.43 m/sec2 |
-0.61 m/sec2 |
82.22% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
4th |
70.9 dB |
70.6 dB |
+0.3 dB |
99.58% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
10th |
642 |
234 |
+408 |
36.45% |
| Rolling Resistance |
1st |
6.6 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
Very low price, good wet performance, low noise level.
Poor dry performance, high rolling resistance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
10th |
39.1 M |
34.5 M |
+4.6 M |
88.24% |
| Dry Handling |
8th |
57.3 s |
56.1 s |
+1.2 s |
97.91% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
8th |
6.4 Points |
7 Points |
-0.6 Points |
91.43% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
10th |
57.5 M |
48.1 M |
+9.4 M |
83.65% |
| Wet Handling |
9th |
94.6 s |
87.2 s |
+7.4 s |
92.18% |
| Straight Aqua |
1st |
98.1 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
3rd |
3.27 m/sec2 |
3.43 m/sec2 |
-0.16 m/sec2 |
95.34% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
4th |
70.9 dB |
70.6 dB |
+0.3 dB |
99.58% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
1st |
234 |
|
|
100% |
| Rolling Resistance |
9th |
8.85 kg / t |
6.6 kg / t |
+2.25 kg / t |
74.58% |
Which of these 5 tyres in 235/55R17 do you recon would be the most comfortable and quiet on an S-Class?
Premium Contact 6
Premium Contact 6 MO-V (Mercedes spec tyre but for the V-Class which is a Van)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Sport Maxx RT2 with NST (sound deadening foam)
Primacy 4
Interesting question, The Dunlop would probably be the quietest thanks to the foam but I would guess the Primacy 4 would give the best overall levels of NVH
Hi Jonathan, do you have any idea, if Dunlop plan something new in 17"? Something like SP Sport Maxx 2 or SportMaxx RT 3. And they have also no all season tyre. In Dunlop is something frozen probably :-D
Dunlop do have a new all season tyre! https://www.tyrereviews.com... they're just not pushing it.
If you don't already know, Goodyear own Dunlop, but at the moment they are going through a phase of pushing Goodyear which is why a lot of the Dunlop tyres are the same as previous generation Goodyear tyres (RT2 = Asym 3)
Thank you, I didn't notice new all season from Dunlop. Looks like siped summer, such a Vredestein way. I prefer directional pattern in winter.
I know about ownership, but I like Dunlop more. So they should release something new due to the name Dunlop.
I'm little bit confused with RT2. In some test is too much "eco" and in another is sporty. A had RT on Auris, and they were good tyres. Not best, but definitely not what some tests are saying.
Which summer tires would you recommend for a 2015 VW Polo 1.4TSI BlueGT? Tire size is 215/40/R17.
The new Continental EcoContact 6 looks good on paper, but can't find any test of it?
So the Pirellis oh boy have they plummeted. I am wondering are there any new tyres planned to be unveiled later this year?
As far as I'm aware there's nothing big and new this year other than the CrossClimate 2.
Strange result for the Pirelli but I'm sure their next range of tyres will be much improved, as the updated P Zero PZ4 is
I was wondering because I do 50.000km / year so I change annually. In 205/55/16 the last 5 years I have sampled efficient grip performance 1, primacy 3, T005, rainstorm 5 and premium contact 6. So I am running out of options for October. As of now I am thinking of e-primacy but haven't been tested yet. Also pirelli is a letdown and the venture prime 3 is pretty old as is the Dunlop blu response.
EGP2 is worth a go if you've only used V1?
From the 5 tyres I would only refit PC6 and T005. I am intrigued by the AE51 Yokohama the EFP2 well it is good no doubt but it seems the least sporty premium choice.
If you do 50.000 km/year than you will not find longer lasting tyre than GY EGP2 and it really also is very fuel efficient. Second best lasting should be Michelin Primacy 4, according to tests. All in 205/55/16.
My experience with GY EGP1 195/65 R15 is that they de facto pay themselves/pay off via fuel saved and long lasting endurance.
P.S. E.g. UK petrol prices are now at an eight-year high.
I read somewhere about the upcoming Conti SportContact 7. How real is that. If they are able to blend the good sportiness of the SC6 with the wear properties of the latest Contis, it should be a killer, don’t you think?