Following on from the 53 tyre wet and dry braking shootout, Auto Bild have tested the top 18 tyres more thoroughly, putting them through the usual mix of wet, dry, wear and NVH tests in 185/60 R15 on a VW Polo.
The Premiums
The Continental PremiumContact 5 was both the overall test winner and also the "eco" winner. While the third placed Michelin Energy Saver+ shared many of the test-winning characteristics of the Conti, the surprise was that Michelin's usual strength of a low wear rate was actually bettered by the CPC5. A high wear rate has historically been a weakness for the German brand in user reviews, but in this test it was Goodyear that came last for wear, with stablemate Dunlop also languishing near the bottom for that category. Test-leading low rolling resistance from the EfficientGrip Performance and Sport BluResponse do mean some of that expense is recovered at the pump, but it didn't help the Goodyear's overall poor ranking of 11th - the lowest of the Premium brands. The Bridgestone Turanza T001 meanwhile struggled with both longevity and economy as well as for noise, while the Pirelli Cinturato P1 Verde's good handling performance was let down by a high rolling resistance.
The Rest
The rise of the mid-range brands (and likewise poor performance of some premiums) may seem a surprise in isolation, but it is actually becoming a growing trend in group tests. Hankook, Nexen and Vredestein all received the top "exemplary" rating, with the Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 coming a highly creditable second overall. The Nexen N'blue HD Plus and Vredestein Sportrac 5 completed the top five. All three makes showed very well rounded driving performance and safety characteristics.
What was a surprise was the two Chinese "no-name" brands of Zeetex and Roadstone making it into the Top 18 final test. Costing around a hundred Euros less per set than the test-winning Continental, the two budget tyres weren't without their weaknesses - The ZT 1000 with low wet grip and resistance to aquaplaning as well as poor wear, and the CP 661 with poor wet and dry handling, long dry braking and also high wear - but both were there on merit and the Zeetex even earned a "satisfactory" rating. Both also finished ahead of the straggling Uniroyal. The RainExpert's directional tread pattern meant it aced the straight-aquaplaning test but struggled with understeer and braking in the dry. It also suffered from a high wear rate and high rolling resistance. All this meant parent brand Continental had the dubious honour of coming both first and last in the test.
As usual, the overall places are ranked as per Auto Bild's weighting, and this may differ from our own unweighted 'total' score.
Top performance in both wet and dry conditions. Stable
cornering and short braking distances in the wet. Very good ride
comfort and low rolling resistance.
Dry specialist with best handling qualities and good
steering precision. Stable
characteristics in the wet. Short wet and dry braking, good value for money.