Bridgestone Potenza S001 Reviews - Page 6

Volkswagen (225/40 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 19 average miles
New VW Golf mk7 GTD was originally fitted with Bridgestone Potenza S001's. At 19,000 miles the front tyres still had 3mm tread and the rear's 5mm but the ride was very hard and uncomfortable, with every pit, pothole and bump in the road surface transmitted though the tyres. Despite there being plenty of legal life remaining I changed all four tyres to Michelin Pilot Sport 4's with an immediate improvement in ride comfort. It feels like all roads have been recenly resurfaced. Dry and wet handling are improved too. Too soon to evaluate wear, but I'm expecting the Michelin's to easily out-perform the Bridgestone's.
Helpful 19 - tyre reviewed on August 25, 2018
Given 33% while driving a Audi A1 (225/35 R18) on mostly country roads for 26,000 spirited miles
Shockingly hard and awful tyre. Dry grip is decent and wet is shocking. This is down to the hard compound of the tyre. Avoid buying these!!!
Helpful 68 - tyre reviewed on August 18, 2018
Given 43% while driving a Volkswagen polo gti 1.8t (215/40 R17) on mostly country roads for 7,000 spirited miles
Tyres only lasted 7000 miles before needing to be replaced on the front but have been dying to get rid of them since only a few weeks old anyway! With about 200bhp I'm surprised they would spin through to 3rd gear in the dry and sometime further in the wet but I must admit the cornering grip has been well above expectation.
Helpful 17 - tyre reviewed on July 2, 2018
What to know the BEST All Season Tyres for 2024? Click to find out!
Given 70% while driving a Volkswagen Golf GTI MK7 (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 5,000 spirited miles
These tires came with the car from new.

For casual driving these tires are good enough: quiet, long lasting and have good wet grip. However, the tires have rather mediocre dry weather performance which quickly deteriorates as the tires get hot. When this happens the tires squeal at even lower speeds and run out of traction much earlier to the point where dry tarmac starts to feel like wet. This must be kept in mind if doing pro-longed fast road driving in warm or dry weather at which point I'd recommend looking elsewhere for high performance tires.
Helpful 22 - tyre reviewed on July 1, 2018
Given 63% while driving a BMW 218d Active Tourer (225/40 R19 W) on mostly motorways for 31 average miles
Had these on a 335d Coupe and my current 340i saloon. On the 335d they were great - plenty of grip is all conditions, very resistant to aquaplaning. However, like all RFTs, the ride was firm .Switch to my 340i and, until recently, I'd have said exactly the same. However, now the front tyres have worn down to ~3mm, there is an alarming tendency to understeer. If you buy these tyres, don't expect to run them down to the anywhere close to the 1.6mm legal minimum.
Helpful 16 - tyre reviewed on May 30, 2018
Given 40% while driving a Skoda Octavia estate (225/40 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 21 easy going miles
I would never have these tires on a car again even if factory fitted, 3.8 mil tread depth center, all tires worn out on o/s edges
There are no tracking issues! done 21,150 miles of easy driving.
Wet surface on incline from stand still wheel spin "very little power to the wheels"
Better grip in the dry, Very bad road noise and it's like riding on brick tires, heavy steering.

Would not recommend at all.

Changed to Fulda Sportcontrol 2 100% better in all departments
Helpful 14 - tyre reviewed on April 21, 2018
Given 77% while driving a Mazda MX5 2.0 SE (ND 2015 onwards) (205/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 15,000 spirited miles
Very grippy until the end of there lifes. Mostly on mountain roads
Helpful 16 - tyre reviewed on March 25, 2018
Given 46% while driving a Volkswagen mk7 Golf GTD (225/40 R18 W) on mostly country roads for 12,000 average miles
Because the state of the roads in this country these Bridgestone s001 are useless.. brand new car 2016 and the tyres are delaminating , with plenty of tread left,, I've not taken this car up to 100 MPH. SO ITS NOT THE SPEED THAT DONE THESE TYRES IN. The front don't grip the road if pulling away to quick.. These tyres DONT suit the golf front wheel drive,, and very bumpy on the road ..Noise level not to bad being low profiles..
Helpful 17 - tyre reviewed on March 25, 2018
Given 63% while driving a Volkswagen polo gti 1.8t (215/40 R17) on a combination of roads for 15,000 spirited miles
Good tyre nothing special i do have them on Polo GTI, and BMW. I do check pressure every week but i wouldn't be able to get 30k. I do love driving cars and motorbikes so i do use cars to full potential sometimes.would i buy again probably not. I am not Bridgestone guy, only because i have better all round tyres, and i do find them a bit stiff, maybe on the smooth road would be a diffrent review but Sydney roads are pretty bad.
Helpful 10 - tyre reviewed on March 21, 2018
Given 73% while driving a Subaru Impreza WRX 2006 Hawkeye (235/40 R18) on mostly town for 0 average miles
The dry grip is excellent aswell as the road feedback and handling. Some people have complained and said that the tyre feels wobbly when turning - However, this is nothing I have felt during my time owning them. The wet grip is also overall good and I have driven in 150km/h when it has been raining like HELL NO, still without problems and with no tendence to aquaplane. The wear rate is a little bit higher, which comes as no suprise for this kind of performance tire. However, if you are considering this tyre, also do consider if you can stand the high noise they will make.
Helpful 13 - tyre reviewed on March 12, 2018
Given 56% while driving a Renault Megane RS250 CUP (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 8,000 spirited miles
Due to a cheap price and convenience I decided to fit these Potenzas to the front end of my Megane RS. When i got into the car a few things were immediate: the noise of the tyre is much louder than what I was previously used to, and often road noise would drown out exhaust noise when not pushing or reving hard :(... these tyres felt stiffer than the Michelin PSS i replaced and certainly more crashy around town and over bumps. The MPG i got dropped too indicating perhaps a softer compound and higher wear rate. In terms of performance the dry performance accelerating was OK though not to the PSS standard, the traction when accelerating was prone to disappearing quite quickly when the tyre was in the wet which obviously didn't helping my wear rate... The stiff construction of the tyre helped however when going round corners, in fact the car felt perfectly damped around quicker corners and a real joy to chuck around... I would receive a lot of feedback too when pushing! I just needed to adjust to the slightly lower traction, especially in the wet. I wouldn't buy these tyres again and the main reasons for this are: the noise, wear and comfort. However decent ratings for feedback and dry grip.
Helpful 11 - tyre reviewed on March 2, 2018
Given 71% while driving a Volkswagen Golf MK7 GTI (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 4,600 average miles
Dry grip is pretty good when the temperatures are in the double figures (Celsius) but really do drop considerably in crisp UK autumn and winter weather. This isn't completely unexpected but if you're not running winter tyres then is a big factor. Wet grip pretty good but the tyre does not let go so progressively in the wet. The biggest factor for me is the wear rate. Having done 4500 miles my fronts are 55% worn and the rears 45% worn (swap them around every 2500 miles). I drive fairly conservatively and the first 800 miles were running in so no harsh acceleration or deceleration. At least 1500 miles are motorway miles cruising at 100kph.
Helpful 10 - tyre reviewed on February 15, 2018