Menu
Kumho Ecsta PS91 Reviews

Kumho Ecsta PS91 Owner Reviews

Review this tyre

What owners say summarised from 43 reviews

Overall, drivers describe the Kumho Ecsta PS91 as a strong value-focused max-performance summer tyre, with many high-scoring reviews praising sharp, responsive handling from its stiff sidewalls and strong dry grip, plus generally low noise levels. Wet grip is often reported as good for the price, but experiences are mixed and several users note reduced confidence in greasy conditions or once tread depth drops. The most consistent drawback across reviews is short/variable tread life (especially on heavier or high-torque cars), making it feel like false economy for some despite the attractive purchase price.

What owners mention most counted across 42 reviews

Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.

Owner ratings averaged from 47 ratings

  • Owner score 71%
  • Dry Grip 82%
  • Road Feedback 76%
  • Handling 75%
  • Comfort 73%
  • Wet Grip 73%
  • Wear 56%

Kumho Ecsta PS91 Reviews - Page 2

Score spread across 41 written reviews
64%
Member
4 new tyres fitted. Fronts needed replacing after 16,000 miles.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 6
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 2
Helpful 1,071
34%
Member
At first i was very impressed with the design and the similarities between Michelin PS4 and PS91. Dry grip was very good but that s the only good thing about this tyre. Sidewall - the stiffness is incredible, you can barely fit them on the rims. Confort - it laks confort, you can feel every bump, big or small, terrible. After 2 years of moderate use 8000k km each summer visible cracks between treads appeared, with is very dangerous thing. On wet they are very slippery, i lost control a couple of times. So then i went for Michelin PS4 and Vredestein Ultrac Vorti which i think is the best tire i had ever had on my Audi A6
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 3
  • Road Feedback 5
  • Handling 3
  • Wear 2
  • Comfort 1
  • Buy again 3
Helpful 903
80%
Member
InI tried kumho ps91. The tread life is very short. I put on my BMW X3. 8 months later I hv to change. My wife drive very careful with kids. I m a bit dissatisfied
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 2
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 9
Helpful 948

Which tyres do you drive?

Researching the Kumho Ecsta PS91? Rate the tyres you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.

Own the Kumho Ecsta PS91?
I drive something else - review any tyre →
697 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed
76%
Member
Boxster 987. Came with these tyres on but one of the rears had a screw in it so replaced both rears about 6000 miles back. grip has been excellent in both wet & dry, but then again, I never push n the wet. Mostly daily driving with occasional fast B-roads, my rears are nearly done after 6000 miles. I'm not sure if that's my driving style or the compound of the rubber. Either way that's a bit dosappointing in terms of wear.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 4
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 6
Helpful 959
Member
  • Volkswagen
  • 255/40 R20
  • 10,000 miles
  • Mostly Country Roads
  • Average
Initially I was very pleased with these tyres. They handled much better than the pirelli tyres that came on the car and overall made the car much more stable in corners. Fitted to the fronts when the rears were nearly at the end of their life, I have now found myself replacing all 4 at the same time. Well, this would be the case if tyres hadn't split along sidewalls rending them useless.
61%
Member
Seemed like a great value midrange tyre initially, but wore out very quickly. All 4 where put on with in a month of each other and only last 12.000s on the front. Maybe 30% left on rears. , while the fronts needed replacing. So I've replaced them all for Dunlop sportmax GTs. Only £10 more per tyre.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 6
  • Comfort 6
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 1,030
50%
Member
  • Mazda RX8
  • 245/35 R18 W
  • 4,000 miles
  • Mostly Country Roads
  • Spirited
Good : -great levels of grip in the dry. -great road feed back. Average : -wear (around 8'000km in the rear) Bad : -really not linear at the limits, in the dry and even worse in the wet. Really not a confidence inspiring tyre. When it goes, it goes. -price, for the price in my size you can have goodyear asymmetric5 for cheaper, and michelin ps4 for only a litle bit more money. I personnaly do not recommend this tyre.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 6
  • Road Feedback 10
  • Handling 2
  • Wear 4
  • Comfort 4
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 889
45%
Member
Dry grip was good. In general the tyre was comfortable. Wet grip was scary a lot of aquaplaning when I went into any amount of water.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 3
  • Road Feedback 4
  • Handling 5
  • Comfort 6
  • Buy again 2
Helpful 781
63%
Member
Tyre is good for grip and handling dry or wet on the rear of a red lexus. Wear though is really poor lasted 6k at best and this was not a hard life
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 3
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 2
Helpful 906
90%
Member
best tyre for the price, the grip is there dry or wet, very balanced tyre , the wear is average but they are cheap, overall you get a premium tyre for lesss money
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 10
  • Wear 8
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 896
61%
Member
Will start by saying these tyres wear quickly on heavy cars!! I have a BMW 320d M Sport and I have done 5,000 miles / 8 months on these tyres and they are now 4mm tread left. So I am expecting these tyres to last up to 10,000 miles :-(

Overall these are good tyres for grip both wet and dry and smooth running. Some things they are not good for are very hard sidewalls so you have to pump the type up to around 36psi to get decent roll on them. Also I was not impressed with the fuel eco on them as they are F grade.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 5
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 2
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 3
Helpful 848
Member
Absolutely terrible tyres had them on my 330i lasted 50000 miles I drive sensible & only do 20 miles a day, worst tyre I've experienced never again
Find your next tyre
All tyre tests

The latest Tyre Reviews tests

Summer Tyres

All Season Tyres

Winter Tyres

SUV and All Terrain Tyres

Track Tyres

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.