Menu

MRF ZLX

The MRF ZLX is a Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

5.8
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
52%
Wet Grip
57%
Road Feedback
53%
Handling
60%
Wear
58%
Comfort
60%
Buy again
46%
9 Reviews
55% Average
237,500 miles driven
MRF ZLX

MRF ZLX

Summer Economy
BETA
5.8 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 9
Avg Rating: 55.1%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.19
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the MRF ZLX

Questions and Answers for the MRF ZLX

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the MRF ZLX. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 MRF ZLX Reviews

Given 10% while driving a Maruti Udyog dezire (165/80 R14) on a combination of roads for 0 miles
I bought MRF zlx tl tyre and within 1 month of purchase the tyre burst from the side. I had to throw away the tyre within a month. I did not see any responsibility of MRF in the matter of tyre. And I will never buy it again
April 10, 2025
Given 40% while driving a Maruti Udyog swift (165/80 R14) on mostly country roads for 0 average miles
I brought MRF zlx last year 2024 October and beleive me in June 2025 Tyre burst from side and I inspected the road where I was driving as I was in City very nominal speed i found nothing sharpener material or object. Please don't buy MRF zlx
August 3, 2025
Hyundai I10 (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 100,000 average miles
I have bought MRF ZLX three years ago ALL FOUR tyres and I have replaced 3 times, yesterday I have claim for my forth one. As dealer told me that you have to replace. Only one time company passed my claim. I wouldn't suggest MRF for your car.
May 23, 2022

How would you rate the MRF ZLX?

Click a star to start your review

Latest MRF ZLX Reviews

Given 10% while driving a Volkswagen (B8) 1.4 TSI (150 Hp) DSG ACT (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 0 easy going miles
Could be better if there is 0 star available for rating. Worst quality of tyres from MRF and gone within 2 months and they simply say there are no manufacturing defects so can’t be claimed. I would not recommend MRF for any vehicle 2 wheeler, 4 wheeler and heavy vehicles. Please don’t waste your money on MRF tyres.
May 9, 2022
Given 94% while driving a Maruti Udyog Maruti ASTAR (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 45,000 average miles
i purchased 4 tyres at intervals of 2 years, 2015 tyres crossed 82k, and 2017 tyres crossed 60k, but due to worst road it got a puncture and now I have replaced all the tyres. but I am so satisfied with the comfort, grip and lasting that I will again purchase the same. ZLX rocks....................
April 24, 2022
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
(225/45 R17 P) on mostly town for 0 average miles
waste of purchasing this MRF tyres,
February 16, 2021
Given 99% while driving a Hyundai I10 (155/80 R13 T) on mostly country roads for 32,000 average miles
I have replaced MRF ZEC company fitted tyres for my Hyundai I-10 sportz 1.2 car with MRF ZLX. The tyres have crossed 55k mark recently and now I think to change two out of them.

Definitely it is as good as for both wet or dry surface. Only thing to worry is it is pro puncture tyre means get punctured. My experience may be caused due to rough condition of roads in my locality.

As for as service after sell is quite good and I have got a new tyre from the company under it s policy of changing tyre due to technical fault.

However 55k mark is enough to consider the company again.

RAJESH KASHYAP
March 4, 2019
Given 10% while driving a Hyundai (180/55 R17) on mostly town for 500 average miles
My last Apollo Tyres were lasted for 7 and half years, after looking at the condition I decided to go for best Indian brand. I was hoping for best but my experience was worst. Eventually it started with dealer it self , they were not at user friendly, still I gone and purchased Tyres , and within two weeks of purchase I observed side cut, I visited delear , but he simply refused to listen saying that Its not covered in warranty without giving proper explanation. This experience was definitely discourage one , I will definitely like to not encourage anybody to go for MRF Tyres..
December 9, 2018
Rate the MRF ZLX