Menu
Nexen N7000 View Gallery (1)

Nexen N7000

Nexen Tyres High Performance All Season

The Nexen N7000 is a High Performance All Season tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.3
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
64%
Wet Grip
49%
Road Feedback
56%
Handling
54%
Wear
76%
Comfort
49%
Buy again
36%
7 Reviews
55% Average
133,004 miles driven
Nexen N7000

Nexen N7000

All Season Mid-Range
BETA
6.3 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 7
Avg Rating: 54.7%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 2.52
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Nexen N7000

Alternative Tyres

Vredestein Quatrac 5
8.3/10
80% 38 reviews
Nexen N5000 Plus
7.1/10
82% 5 reviews
Continental Extremecontact DWS 06
7.1/10
79% 10 reviews
Continental ExtremeContact DWS
7.0/10
86% 9 reviews
Hankook Optimo 4S
6.7/10
83% 32 reviews
Vredestein Quatrac Lite
6.4/10
84% 7 reviews
Goodyear Eagle Vector
6.3/10
83% 5 reviews
Vredestein Quatrac 3
5.6/10
79% 48 reviews
Delinte D7
80% 4 reviews
Show All All Season High Performance tyres

Questions and Answers for the Nexen N7000

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Nexen N7000. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Nexen N7000 Reviews

Given 54% while driving a BMW 730Li (245/45 R19) on mostly motorways for 3,000 easy going miles
The tyre are very noisy. Super loud. Bot suitable for those who love quite drive. But it grip and handle well.
Helpful 815
September 22, 2022
Given 67% while driving a Toyota avensis 2.2 D cat (215/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 22,000 average miles
The performance of the tires is far from the premium brands, but are good choice for cheap tyre
Helpful 588
October 31, 2016
Given 30% while driving a Porsche Cayman (265/35 R19 R) on a combination of roads for 4 spirited miles

These tyres may be black and round, but it's about all they have in common with other brands. But I suspect the material they're mad of is closer to bakelite than actual rubber.

Dry grip is okay-ish, if you don't push too hard, wet grip is positively terrifying. What's worse, the tyres let go with almost no warning.

The 35 section tyres on 19" wheels that I have are harsh and noisy, making trips on less than perfect road surfaces an unpleasant chore.

On the positive side, they're last a long time. Which is a shame, because I'm getting rid of them after only 6,500km.
Helpful 492
April 19, 2015

How would you rate the Nexen N7000?

Click a star to start your review

201 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Nexen N7000 Reviews

Given 39% while driving a Saab Automobile 9 3 1.9 TiD (120PS) Vector Sport Airflow (235/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 7,000 spirited miles
I had 4 of these tires new, replaced after 15,000km with Bridgestone MY02 never looked back again. I have a Saab 93 TID, dry grip was good not great and wet, your gonna die real soon, lost control after 40km going thru a roundabout. Just pay the $30 more and get a Bridgestone or Kumho.
Helpful 522
January 12, 2013
Given 87% while driving a Holden Calais 2003 (235/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 60,000 spirited miles
fantastic heaps better than some big name these are an up and coming tyre brand for sure
Helpful 521
September 28, 2011
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 59% while driving a Subaru wrx turbo (215/35 R18) on mostly country roads for 1,000 average miles
tires are ok for non turbo cars and average driving style. as i like to push hard sometimes, the tires showed their limits fast. confortable, high noise after half life, really not for sport cars. reaching the 3mm tires are dangerous breaking, on dry and wet. changed for nexen N1000 and they are far better on dry and wet, and very quiet too. N1000 are almost the same level of yokohama dna s.drive i had before, just not that much feedback. definitely i recomend nexen N1000 instead.
Helpful 504
August 26, 2011
Given 47% while driving a Mazda Mazda3 MPS Aero (225/45 R17 W) on mostly motorways for 40,000 average miles
After driving for about 50000 Km the tires got very dry and the handling became very bad and too much noise
Helpful 468
May 20, 2010
Rate the Nexen N7000