2014 EVO Max Performance Summer Tyre Test

Test Summary
Wet Braking	Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Dry Braking	Continental Sport Contact 5
Rolling Resistance	Dunlop SportMaxx RT
Noise	Michelin Pilot Sport 3 PS3
Snow Handling	Continental Sport Contact 5
Ice Braking	Dunlop SportMaxx RT

Here at TyreReviews we always get excited when EVO publish a tyre test. Normally tyre tests focus on raw numbers, dedicating pages to telling you which tyre has 0.1% more grip, but forgetting to mention how the tyres actually feel on the car.

Conversely EVO spend plenty of time, and dedicate 60% of the overall result, to subjective handling. With the difference in grip between the best tyres on the market ever shrinking, explaining how the tyres actually feel to use give people who enjoy driving a good reference point. This years test was carried out at the Bridgestone test track in Italy, on a VW Golf GTI wearing 225/45 R17 tyres.

The top three

It's back to the top step for Continental with a convincing all round performance from the Sport Contact 5. Only dropping out of the top three twice, the Sport Contact 5 excelled in both subjective feel and objective handling. The aging, but updated Pirelli P Zero had a good result in second place, largely down to wet and dry handling, and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 rounded out the top three, with the usual Goodyear blend of wet grip and steering feel.

The Rest

Fourth spot was taken by Yokohama, with the AD08. It was a surprising nomination from Yokohama, with the Advan V105 the logical choice, but the gamble paid off. Easily the most exciting and fastest tyre in the dry, it wasn't as awful as some track day tyres in the wet, giving you an "extreme performance" tyre you can drive all year.

Michelin finished fifth, with a good all round performance, but we tend to feel the French brand was disadvantaged by the small size chosen. The Michelin Pilot Super Sport would have been the logical competitor to the other tyres on test, but starting in 18 inches Michelin had to put forward the softer, more touring orientated Pilot Sport 3.

Vredestein entered the replacement to the Ultrac Sessanta, the Vorti, and will be happy they beat Toyo and Hankook to win the battle of the midrange tyres. Dunlop disappointed in ninth struggling with overall grip, and Bridgestone embarrassingly finished last at home, with neither good feel or good grip.

Sidewall Stiffness

The stiff sidewalled Yokohama AD08 One thing we're always being asked is "does sidewall stiffness relate to handling?" To try and answer this, we visited the warehouse at lovetyres.com and measured the sidewall stiffness of each tyre on test with a totally unscientific "squeeze test".

Expecting to find an approximate correlation between the best subjective tyres on test, and the stiffest sidewalls, the results surprised us. Here is the order of stiffness, grouped into approximate stiffness groups, and the subjective dry handling result.

Tyre in order of sidewall stiffness	Subjective dry position
Yokohama	1st
Group 2
Vredestein	7th
Bridgestone	9th
Toyo	6th
Hankook	4th
Michelin	8th
Group 3
Pirelli	2nd
Continental	2nd
Goodyear	5th
Dunlop	10th

The best and worst in group are in the right places, but there's no pattern between second place and ninth! Obviously there's more at work than basic sidewall stiffness to subjective handling.

It is however worth noting, subjective handling isn't just down to the tyre - it's how the car works with the tyre, the tyre size on test, and what that particular writer values while driving. For example, we've tested various tyres in 19 inch on an E46 BMW M3, and the Bridgestone Potenza S001 is the best we've tried for pure steering feel and feedback (but not outright grip.)

Sadly, with no easy formula to subjective tyre feel, it looks like you have to look into detailed user reviews on your chosen vehicle.

The Results

Below are the full results. Please note, we've not included aquaplaning scores, or applied any weighting, so make sure you pick up a copy of EVO issue 201 (November 2014) for the test in its full glory. Also we entered the EVO road route test as "comfort", but EVO took into account comfort, noise and steering feel.

With four wins, and only twice dropping out of the top three, it was a convincing win for Continental with the Sport Contact 5. Both subjectively and objectively, the Sport Contact 5 is a joy to drive

Total: 651

Dry 98.3

Wet 100

Subjective 189.4

Comfort 95.3

Rolling Resistance 80.8

Cost 87.2

Whilst being a relatively old pattern, the updated P Zero put in a very strong performance in the key wet and dry handling tests. Often the only tyre to get close to the Continental in outright grip

Total: 636.9

Dry 98.4

Wet 99.5

Subjective 185.7

Comfort 90.7

Rolling Resistance 76

Cost 86.6

While the now aging Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 failed to win any categories, its consistent placing in all tests resulted in a top three finish. Easy to judge levels of grip, and progressive over the limit

Total: 640.9

Dry 98.1

Wet 99.3

Subjective 166.9

Comfort 86

Rolling Resistance 90.8

Cost 99.8

Yokohma took a gamble when it nominated the AD08 instead of the V105, but it paid off. Sensational in the dry, surprisingly "ok" in the wet, and performing well on the road too, the AD08 is a trackday tyre you can drive every day

Total: 603.6

Dry 100

Wet 93.5

Subjective 173.9

Comfort 97.7

Rolling Resistance 67.4

Cost 71.1

Winning both aquaplaning tests and the road route, there was plenty to like about the Michelin and its weighty steering feel

Total: 606.5

Dry 97.4

Wet 97.8

Subjective 152.4

Comfort 100

Rolling Resistance 76.1

Cost 82.8

Similar performance to the seventh place Toyo, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti was mostly a "mid table" tyre throughout the tests. It did well in wet handling, where it inspired confidence and finished third on the road route thanks to being comfortable and quiet

Total: 608.4

Dry 97.6

Wet 96.7

Subjective 157.1

Comfort 95.3

Rolling Resistance 69.5

Cost 92.2

Seventh seems like a fair place for the Toyo T1 Sport. It didn't really excel in any tests, performing slightly better in the wet handling tests than the dry, but offered better feel when the roads were dry. Reasonably priced

Total: 607

Dry 97.1

Wet 96.6

Subjective 160.2

Comfort 83.7

Rolling Resistance 71.5

Cost 97.9

The Hankook S1 Evo 2 had both good results, and bad. Strong in aquaplaning, and mid pack in dry handling, the tyre was let down by a last place finish in wet handling and a poor score on the road route section

Total: 601.8

Dry 97.9

Wet 95.6

Subjective 152.9

Comfort 81.4

Rolling Resistance 79.7

Cost 94.3

Well priced, best rolling resistance, good feel with the limit eas to judge, let down by the limit not being higher

Total: 615.7

Dry 96.7

Wet 96.3

Subjective 129.7

Comfort 93

Rolling Resistance 100

Cost 100

The home advantage counting for nothing, the Bridgestone S001 finished last, struggling in both the subjective and measured tests

Total: 582.4

Dry 97.3

Wet 96.5

Subjective 127.6

Comfort 93

Rolling Resistance 75.1

Cost 92.9

Menu

2014 EVO Max Performance Summer Tyre Test

The top three

The Rest

Sidewall Stiffness

The Results

Continental Sport Contact 5

Pirelli P Zero

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

Michelin Pilot Sport 3 PS3

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti

Toyo Proxes T1 Sport

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2

Dunlop SportMaxx RT

Bridgestone Potenza S001

Similar Tyre Tests