Menu

Test source AutoCentrum

2019 Auto Center Winter Tyre Test

Overall test winnerNokian WR Snowproof

The 2019 Auto Center winter tyre test is both good and bad. The positive is that out of ten 205/55 R16 patterns, it only includes two premium manufacturers.

Tyres tested
10
Tested size
205/55 R16
Disciplines
12

At a glance

Tyre shortlist

10 Tyres tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Nokian WR Snowproof

+High grip on ice, excellent snow handling, good dry braking.

−None mentioned.

Read full verdict
2nd

Continental WinterContact TS 860

+High aquaplaning resistance, very well balanced tyre, excellent snow braking.

−None mentioned.

Read full verdict
3rd

Michelin Alpin 6

+Excellent wet braking, low noise.

−Average ice performance.

Read full verdict
Joint4th

Barum Polaris 5

+Low price, good wet handling.

−Poor snow handling.

Read full verdict
Joint4th

Debica Frigo HP2

+Short ice braking, good ice traction, low noise.

−Poor wet handling.

Read full verdict
Joint4th

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

+Short snow and ice braking, good ice traction, high aquaplaning resistance.

−Poor dry handling, average wet grip.

Read full verdict
Joint4th

Gislaved Euro Frost 6

+Good dry handling, short ice braking, good snow and ice traction.

−Long wet braking.

Read full verdict
8th

Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905

+Good wet and dry handling, short wet braking distances.

−Poor ice braking and handling, high fuel use.

Read full verdict
9th

Toyo Snowprox S954

+Good in the dry and wet.

−Long snow braking, low ice grip.

Read full verdict
10th

Uniroyal MS Plus 77

+High aquaplaning resistance, good ice handling.

−Long braking distances on all surfaces, low ice traction, poor handling.

Read full verdict

Tyre shortlist

Compare selected tyres

2019 Auto Center Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16

TyreNokian WR SnowproofContinental WinterContact TS 860Michelin Alpin 6Barum Polaris 5Debica Frigo HP2Fulda Kristall Control HP2Gislaved Euro Frost 6Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905Toyo Snowprox S954Uniroyal MS Plus 77
Position1st2nd3rdJoint 4thJoint 4thJoint 4thJoint 4th8th9th10th
Category scores (% of best)
Dry96.6%91.7%89.3%83.1%83.1%83.3%92.1%92.5%90.9%78.8%
Wet91.7%95.6%95.7%93.7%84.8%87.4%83%97.9%91.2%87.4%
Snow92.8%91.1%86.7%85.6%89.7%88.2%88.7%88.7%86.6%91.3%
Ice100%89.5%93.5%90.2%94.5%95.2%96%83.5%90.5%82.8%
Comfort90%80%100%80%90%50%60%80%70%50%
Rolling Resistance95.4%94.6%88.7%100%94.4%94%89.8%86.4%90%90.4%
Keep researchingRead owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

The 2019 Auto Center winter tyre test is both good and bad.

The positive is that out of ten 205/55 R16 patterns, it only includes two premium manufacturers. This means we get a much better look at the midrange bracket of winter tyres, which is great for those of us who want to save a little money, and all ten patterns on test have been tested for ice braking and traction which is now usually omitted from central European tyre testing.

Sadly, Auto Center decided not to provide any data from handling testing, instead giving an overall subjective score, which we assume combines lap time and handling. While this is a little odd, it's better than no test at all.

The final results might not make a buying decision any easier either, as nearly half the tyres on test finished in fourth place. With everything so close in the midrange pack, make sure you drill into the test data to really help you understand which tyre is best for your own driving needs.

 

Dry

During dry braking, the Nokian Snowproof had an unusually large braking advantage, stopping the car nearly two meters shorter than the next best tyre.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
27.43 m Best
29.41 m +1.98 m
29.47 m +2.04 m
29.5 m +2.07 m
30.32 m +2.89 m
30.43 m +3.00 m
30.46 m +3.03 m
30.5 m +3.07 m
31.22 m +3.79 m
31.61 m +4.18 m

The difference between best and worst was 15.2% (4.18 m ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths).

The Continental WinterContact TS860 finished joint top with the Gislaved Euro Frost 6. 

Subj. Dry Handling

Subjective Dry Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
10 Points Best
10 Points Best
9 Points -1.00 Points
8 Points -2.00 Points
8 Points -2.00 Points
7 Points -3.00 Points
6 Points -4.00 Points
5 Points -5.00 Points
5 Points -5.00 Points
4 Points -6.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 60% (6 Points).

Wet

The premium tyres from Michelin and Continental were the best in wet braking.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
33.35 m Best
33.85 m +0.50 m
33.91 m +0.56 m
34.74 m +1.39 m
35.21 m +1.86 m
35.29 m +1.94 m
36.15 m +2.80 m
36.27 m +2.92 m
36.5 m +3.15 m
38.18 m +4.83 m

The difference between best and worst was 14.5% (4.83 m ≈ 1.1 Car Lengths).

Yokohama had a strong result in the wet handling tests.

Subj. Wet Handling

Subjective Wet Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
10 Points Best
9 Points -1.00 Points
8 Points -2.00 Points
8 Points -2.00 Points
8 Points -2.00 Points
7 Points -3.00 Points
6 Points -4.00 Points
6 Points -4.00 Points
6 Points -4.00 Points
5 Points -5.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 50% (5 Points).

The Continental WinterContact TS860 had another strong result in the wet, winning the aquaplaning test.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
86 km/h Best
83.5 km/h -2.50 km/h
82.5 km/h -3.50 km/h
81.5 km/h -4.50 km/h
80.8 km/h -5.20 km/h
80.7 km/h -5.30 km/h
80.7 km/h -5.30 km/h
80.6 km/h -5.40 km/h
79.6 km/h -6.40 km/h
76.4 km/h -9.60 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 11.2% (9.6 Km/H).

Snow

Continental proved to be excellent in snow braking too.

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
15.06 m Best
15.17 m +0.11 m
15.19 m +0.13 m
15.19 m +0.13 m
15.32 m +0.26 m
15.36 m +0.30 m
15.46 m +0.40 m
15.58 m +0.52 m
15.91 m +0.85 m
17.53 m +2.47 m

The difference between best and worst was 16.4% (2.47 m ≈ 0.5 Car Lengths).

Strangely, the top two tyres from snow braking were near the bottom of the pack in snow traction.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
6.11 N Best
5.6 N -0.51 N
5.41 N -0.70 N
5.32 N -0.79 N
5.3 N -0.81 N
5.22 N -0.89 N
5.21 N -0.90 N
5.12 N -0.99 N
5.08 N -1.03 N
5.06 N -1.05 N

The difference between best and worst was 17.2% (1.05 N).

Braking proved to be more important than traction for the snow handling tests, with Continental and Nokian back on top.

Subj. Snow Handling

Subjective Snow Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
10 Points Best
9 Points -1.00 Points
8 Points -2.00 Points
8 Points -2.00 Points
7 Points -3.00 Points
7 Points -3.00 Points
6 Points -4.00 Points
6 Points -4.00 Points
5 Points -5.00 Points
4 Points -6.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 60% (6 Points).

Ice

Nokian demonstrated its nordic routes, winning the ice braking and ice traction testing.

Ice Braking

Ice braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Ice Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
11.44 m Best
11.84 m +0.40 m
11.88 m +0.44 m
11.95 m +0.51 m
11.96 m +0.52 m
12.26 m +0.82 m
12.52 m +1.08 m
12.66 m +1.22 m
13.4 m +1.96 m
13.67 m +2.23 m

The difference between best and worst was 19.5% (2.23 m ≈ 0.5 Car Lengths).

Ice Traction

Ice acceleration time

Lower is better ↓
Ice Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
5.14 s Best
5.39 s +0.25 s
5.43 s +0.29 s
5.55 s +0.41 s
5.63 s +0.49 s
5.67 s +0.53 s
5.77 s +0.63 s
6 s +0.86 s
6.17 s +1.03 s
6.4 s +1.26 s

The difference between best and worst was 24.5% (1.26 s).

Other

The Barum had a very low rolling resistance.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
8.15 kg/t Best £0
8.54 kg/t +0.39 kg/t £21
8.62 kg/t +0.47 kg/t £25
8.64 kg/t +0.49 kg/t £27
8.67 kg/t +0.52 kg/t £28
9.01 kg/t +0.86 kg/t £47
9.06 kg/t +0.91 kg/t £49
9.08 kg/t +0.93 kg/t £50
9.18 kg/t +1.03 kg/t £56
9.43 kg/t +1.28 kg/t £69

The difference between best and worst was 15.7% (1.28 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 uses about 48 L (£69) more fuel than the Barum Polaris 5.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Michelin and Nokian finished the test with the highest subjective comfort scores.

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TyreResultGap to best
10 Points Best
9 Points -1.00 Points
9 Points -1.00 Points
8 Points -2.00 Points
8 Points -2.00 Points
8 Points -2.00 Points
7 Points -3.00 Points
6 Points -4.00 Points
5 Points -5.00 Points
5 Points -5.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 50% (5 Points).

Results

1st

Nokian WR Snowproof

205/55 R16
Nokian WR Snowproof
Dry96.6%
Wet91.7%
Snow92.8%
Ice100%
Comfort90%
Rolling Resistance95.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 1027.43 mBest in this discipline
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better4th / 108 Points-2.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better6th / 1035.29 m+1.94 m
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better3rd / 108 Points-2.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better9th / 1079.6 km/h-6.40 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 1015.17 m+0.11 m
Snow TractionHigher is better7th / 105.21 N-0.90 N
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better1st / 1010 PointsBest in this discipline
Ice BrakingLower is better1st / 1011.44 mBest in this discipline
Ice TractionLower is better1st / 105.14 sBest in this discipline
Subj. ComfortHigher is better2nd / 109 Points-1.00 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better2nd / 108.543 kg/t+0.40 kg/t
2nd

Continental WinterContact TS 860

205/55 R16
Continental WinterContact TS 860
Dry91.7%
Wet95.6%
Snow91.1%
Ice89.5%
Comfort80%
Rolling Resistance94.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better7th / 1030.46 m+3.03 m
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better1st / 1010 PointsBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 1033.85 m+0.50 m
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better3rd / 108 Points-2.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 1086 km/hBest in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better1st / 1015.06 mBest in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better8th / 105.12 N-0.99 N
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better2nd / 109 Points-1.00 Points
Ice BrakingLower is better6th / 1012.26 m+0.82 m
Ice TractionLower is better8th / 106 s+0.86 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better4th / 108 Points-2.00 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better3rd / 108.618 kg/t+0.47 kg/t
3rd

Michelin Alpin 6

205/55 R16
Michelin Alpin 6
Dry89.3%
Wet95.7%
Snow86.7%
Ice93.5%
Comfort100%
Rolling Resistance88.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 1029.41 m+1.98 m
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better6th / 107 Points-3.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 1033.35 mBest in this discipline
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better3rd / 108 Points-2.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 1081.5 km/h-4.50 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better8th / 1015.58 m+0.52 m
Snow TractionHigher is better10th / 105.06 N-1.05 N
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better5th / 107 Points-3.00 Points
Ice BrakingLower is better5th / 1011.96 m+0.52 m
Ice TractionLower is better5th / 105.63 s+0.49 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 1010 PointsBest in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better9th / 109.184 kg/t+1.04 kg/t
Joint 4th

Barum Polaris 5

205/55 R16
Barum Polaris 5
Dry83.1%
Wet93.7%
Snow85.6%
Ice90.2%
Comfort80%
Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better8th / 1030.5 m+3.07 m
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better8th / 105 Points-5.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 1035.21 m+1.86 m
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better2nd / 109 Points-1.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better8th / 1080.6 km/h-5.40 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better7th / 1015.46 m+0.40 m
Snow TractionHigher is better6th / 105.22 N-0.89 N
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better9th / 105 Points-5.00 Points
Ice BrakingLower is better7th / 1012.52 m+1.08 m
Ice TractionLower is better7th / 105.77 s+0.63 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better4th / 108 Points-2.00 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better1st / 108.148 kg/tBest in this discipline
Joint 4th

Debica Frigo HP2

205/55 R16
Debica Frigo HP2
Dry83.1%
Wet84.8%
Snow89.7%
Ice94.5%
Comfort90%
Rolling Resistance94.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better9th / 1031.22 m+3.79 m
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better7th / 106 Points-4.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better9th / 1036.5 m+3.15 m
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better10th / 105 Points-5.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better6th / 1080.7 km/h-5.30 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better3rd / 1015.19 m+0.13 m
Snow TractionHigher is better4th / 105.32 N-0.79 N
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better5th / 107 Points-3.00 Points
Ice BrakingLower is better3rd / 1011.88 m+0.44 m
Ice TractionLower is better4th / 105.55 s+0.41 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better2nd / 109 Points-1.00 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better4th / 108.635 kg/t+0.49 kg/t
Joint 4th

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

205/55 R16
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Dry83.3%
Wet87.4%
Snow88.2%
Ice95.2%
Comfort50%
Rolling Resistance94%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 1030.43 m+3.00 m
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better8th / 105 Points-5.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better7th / 1036.15 m+2.80 m
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better7th / 106 Points-4.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better3rd / 1082.5 km/h-3.50 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better3rd / 1015.19 m+0.13 m
Snow TractionHigher is better5th / 105.3 N-0.81 N
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better7th / 106 Points-4.00 Points
Ice BrakingLower is better4th / 1011.95 m+0.51 m
Ice TractionLower is better3rd / 105.43 s+0.29 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better9th / 105 Points-5.00 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better5th / 108.672 kg/t+0.52 kg/t
Joint 4th

Gislaved Euro Frost 6

205/55 R16
Gislaved Euro Frost 6
Dry92.1%
Wet83%
Snow88.7%
Ice96%
Comfort60%
Rolling Resistance89.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better5th / 1030.32 m+2.89 m
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better1st / 1010 PointsBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better10th / 1038.18 m+4.83 m
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better7th / 106 Points-4.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better10th / 1076.4 km/h-9.60 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better6th / 1015.36 m+0.30 m
Snow TractionHigher is better9th / 105.08 N-1.03 N
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better3rd / 108 Points-2.00 Points
Ice BrakingLower is better2nd / 1011.84 m+0.40 m
Ice TractionLower is better2nd / 105.39 s+0.25 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better8th / 106 Points-4.00 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better8th / 109.076 kg/t+0.93 kg/t
8th

Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905

205/55 R16
Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905
Dry92.5%
Wet97.9%
Snow88.7%
Ice83.5%
Comfort80%
Rolling Resistance86.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 1029.5 m+2.07 m
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 109 Points-1.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 1033.91 m+0.56 m
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better1st / 1010 PointsBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better5th / 1080.8 km/h-5.20 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better9th / 1015.91 m+0.85 m
Snow TractionHigher is better2nd / 105.6 N-0.51 N
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better7th / 106 Points-4.00 Points
Ice BrakingLower is better10th / 1013.67 m+2.23 m
Ice TractionLower is better9th / 106.17 s+1.03 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better4th / 108 Points-2.00 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better10th / 109.426 kg/t+1.28 kg/t
9th

Toyo Snowprox S954

205/55 R16
Toyo Snowprox S954
Dry90.9%
Wet91.2%
Snow86.6%
Ice90.5%
Comfort70%
Rolling Resistance90%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 1029.47 m+2.04 m
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better4th / 108 Points-2.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better4th / 1034.74 m+1.39 m
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better6th / 107 Points-3.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better6th / 1080.7 km/h-5.30 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better10th / 1017.53 m+2.47 m
Snow TractionHigher is better1st / 106.11 NBest in this discipline
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better10th / 104 Points-6.00 Points
Ice BrakingLower is better8th / 1012.66 m+1.22 m
Ice TractionLower is better6th / 105.67 s+0.53 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better7th / 107 Points-3.00 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better7th / 109.057 kg/t+0.91 kg/t
10th

Uniroyal MS+ 77

205/55 R16
Uniroyal MS Plus 77
Dry78.8%
Wet87.4%
Snow91.3%
Ice82.8%
Comfort50%
Rolling Resistance90.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better10th / 1031.61 m+4.18 m
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better10th / 104 Points-6.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better8th / 1036.27 m+2.92 m
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better7th / 106 Points-4.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 1083.5 km/h-2.50 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better5th / 1015.32 m+0.26 m
Snow TractionHigher is better3rd / 105.41 N-0.70 N
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better3rd / 108 Points-2.00 Points
Ice BrakingLower is better9th / 1013.4 m+1.96 m
Ice TractionLower is better10th / 106.4 s+1.26 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better9th / 105 Points-5.00 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better6th / 109.009 kg/t+0.86 kg/t

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.
Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.