Menu
Fullway HP 108 View Gallery (1)

Fullway HP 108

Fullway Tyres Touring Summer

The Fullway HP 108 is a Touring Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.2
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
71%
Wet Grip
50%
Road Feedback
53%
Handling
48%
Wear
58%
Comfort
49%
Buy again
30%
13 Reviews
51% Average
90,115 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 51st)
Fullway HP 108

Fullway HP 108

Summer Budget
BETA
6.2 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 0
Period: 2013
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 13
Avg Rating: 51.4%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.09
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2013 54 Tyre Braking Test 2013 195/65 R15 51/54 0 metrics
All Tests
View Test Results
1
Tests
51st
Average
51st
Best
51st
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2013 54 Tyre Braking Test
195/65 R15 • 2013
51st/54

Questions and Answers for the Fullway HP 108

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Fullway HP 108. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Fullway HP 108 Reviews

Given 34% while driving a Nissan altima (215/60 R16) on mostly town for 15 average miles
The edges of the tires have worn terribly in 15,000. They ride very hard.
Helpful 698
June 13, 2025
Given 66% while driving a Honda (215/45 R17) on mostly town for 20,000 spirited miles
2007 honda accord sedan, 2.4l, 5spd MT.
Impressed all around by the tire initially. Sporty driving, good grip. However, as they aged the last 24 months they have gotten very, very noisy at almost all speeds, slow and fast and an imperfection that feels like out of balance again.
Helpful 770
December 15, 2023
Given 77% while driving a Volvo XC40 (245/45 R20) on mostly country roads for 8,000 average miles
Put these on my small crossover because of the price. For that price, they are perfectly fine. Sometimes I am "sportier" and more aggressive in my driving, which these have some lower limits. I usually get a traction light when accelerating from a stop, I think the cause is there is no tread block in the central rib, like many other tires. Otherwise, for 99% normal driving (gentle acceleration, light to firm braking, not cornering fast) these are perfect for the job. I haven't noticed a ton of road noise - they're a bit nosier than the Pirelli Scorpions probably that I originally had, but most of the year I have to use snow tires anyways, so these are quieter than those anyways.
Helpful 694
June 22, 2023

How would you rate the Fullway HP 108?

Click a star to start your review

193 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Fullway HP 108 Reviews

Given 39% while driving a Nissan Maxima (245/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 2,000 average miles
Went from a set of Falken (excellent) to these based on look and price. I can't believe how dumb I was using this criteria. I'd seen some reviews slamming these in slippery conditions but thought they couldn't be that bad. My bad. It snowed here today -- that fine light snow and the car would just not stop. The anti lock breaking system would activate at the smallest press of the brake pedal. And setting up for a turn? No dice, the car went straight having no intention to go in the direction turned. Do not buy these tires!
Helpful 746
February 21, 2023
Given 60% while driving a Chevrolet camaro (/45 R17) on mostly town for 0 average miles
I have all four and one is splitting near the bead!
Helpful 715
May 16, 2022
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 82% while driving a Subaru Impreza WRX STI (/40 R18) on mostly town for 100 average miles
Very leary at first because of the price but they look great and ride great. Got to test them in a bad rain storm and they cut through the water like butter…..last test will come this winter
Helpful 806
September 1, 2021
Given 85% while driving a Chevrolet camaro (315/35 R20) on a combination of roads for 5,000 spirited miles
Although i cant give a wear rating due to only having them 5k miles, they are really good in dry and wet roads. I have this on my 2013 camaro ss. I do drive it a bit aggressive aswell as living in gravel road i probably wont be able to give an accurate wear rating through its whole life. I will definitely buy these again.
Helpful 730
March 7, 2021
Given 40% while driving a (205/55 R16) on mostly motorways for 20,000 average miles
The only good thing about these tyres was that they worked well under dry breaking. Otherwise, the were noisey and terrible in the wet. Over 20,000km driven on them and they hardly worn. That is not a good thing. Avoid these at all costs.
Helpful 790
August 16, 2018
Given 49% while driving a Land Rover Range Rover Sport (285/35 R22 R) on mostly motorways for 0 easy going miles
Found these tyres to be noisy on the road and a little lumpy. I recently had all four tyres balanced, when on the machine u could see them going up and down. Well i've learned something again ... pay cheap prices and receive rubbish.

Helpful 517
February 26, 2018
Given 17% while driving a BMW 525d E61 Touring M Sport (245/40 R18 W) on mostly town for 25,000 average miles
Bought a 05 BMW 525d. 2 Fullway HP108 were on the rear wheels. These are lethal. No grip at all when road is slightly damp.
Dsc was flashing in every bend and managed to get sideways at 50 kph on 45 degree bend.
Tyres were 3 years old and going by NCT reports, about 40k km-s traveled on them, 7mm thread is still left. I have no idea, how previous owner managed that, but I would recommend to stay away of these tyres, if you value your own and other peoples lives.
I have since replaced these tyres with better brand and car is not trying to kill me in every corner any more.
Helpful 487
September 17, 2017
Given 31% while driving a Mercedes Benz c 220 cdi (205/55 R16 R) on mostly town for 5,000 average miles
Total crap - how to make a quality car lethal - slightest damp and mildest bend and you are fighting the traction control system.

I'm binning them after less than 5000 miles - not worth the rise in insurance premium
Helpful 521
December 26, 2016
Given 36% while driving a Ford Falcon G6E (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
I bought the car with 19 inch wheels and 4x brand new of these tyres, they look the part, very "sporty" looking, I thought they couldn't be too bad (I should have known a dealer would have put the cheapest and crappest tyres ever on the car).
The truth is that they are cheap and nasty. Noisy as, really noisy, damn annoying. Ok grip in the dry but deadly in the wet, should be banned. Just plain dangerous. They take away any acceleration or cornering ability when driving on a wet surface.
Spend a bit more and buy something with at least some kind of quality.
Helpful 564
June 27, 2016
Given 60% while driving a Mitsubishi mirage dohc (205/50 R16) on mostly town for 5,000 easy going miles
Not bad for a budget tire. Replaced two Nankang's and they are much more quiet. Good dry grip and comfort. Didnt push them to the limit in wet.
Helpful 492
October 15, 2014
Rate the Fullway HP 108