“Fine in the dry, hopeless for in the wet. In the wet the traction is dramatically reduced and cornering is hopeless. Huge understeer. You must dramatically slow down for cornering in the wet. Probably the worst wet...”
Marshal Matrac TX KU17
The Marshal Matrac TX KU17 is a High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.
The quick answer
Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tyre - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated November 2016.
- 8owner reviews
- 92,014miles driven
All Tests
Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Marshal Matrac TX KU17
Frequently Asked Questions
How comfortable and quiet are the Marshal Matrac TX KU17?
How well do the Marshal Matrac TX KU17 wear, according to owners?
Would owners buy the Marshal Matrac TX KU17 again?
Owner Questions
Ask a questionQuestions and Answers for the Marshal Matrac TX KU17
Marshal Matrac TX KU17 Owner Reviews
Review this tyreWhat owners say
Across 8 owner ratings the Marshal Matrac TX KU17 averages 69%. Owners rate Dry Grip highest at 8.1 out of 10 and Road Feedback lowest at 6.4. 4 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles. 50% of owners score it 70% or better.
Owner ratings averaged from 8 ratings
- Owner score 69%
- Dry Grip 81%
- Wear 71%
- Comfort 69%
- Wet Grip 68%
- Handling 66%
- Road Feedback 64%
Featured reviews
“Not enough grip while braking at high-speed(like 100mph over) and curving at hill road, especially in not so warm temp. at the tire's surface. Road noise level is not so good, and not so comfort. But cost performance is...”
“These tyres did not inspire confidence and had limited cornering grip in the wet (not due to lack of tread). They made the car's steering very twitchy, even roadmarkings would deflect the steering. The tyres did last...”
All 8 Marshal Matrac TX KU17 reviews
- MINI Cooper D
- 225/45 R17
- 2,000 miles
- Mostly Town
- Average
In the wet the traction is dramatically reduced and cornering is hopeless. Huge understeer. You must dramatically slow down for cornering in the wet.
Probably the worst wet weather tyres I can remember in 30 years of driving.
- Alfa Romeo 159
- 225/45 R17
- 10,000 miles
- Mostly Town
- Average
On the downside, I had problems with jiggly steering with these tyres. Some road surfaces can suddenly pull sideways. At 5K miles I had to switch back/front because the steering was pulling to left even after full 4w balancing. Though there could be other causes for this, switching tyres solved the problem.
Overall ok for the price, especially for commuter cars.
- 215/40 R17 W
- 14 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
Generally, the tyres are great in the dry - inspiring confidence and allowing all 350bhp to be firmly planted through all 4 wheels.
In the wet though,you have to keep your wits about you as you can be easily caught out. Even breaks traction in 3rd when full boost comes on song...
Gav
Which tyres do you drive?
Researching the Marshal Matrac TX KU17? Rate the tyres you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.
- Alfa Romeo GT 3.2
- 225/40 R18 W
- 25,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
Road noise level is not so good, and not so comfort. But cost performance is very good, totally.
- Audi 100 quattro turbo
- 225/45 R17 W
- 25,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
They made the car's steering very twitchy, even roadmarkings would deflect the steering. The tyres did last well (at least 25000 miles with tread to spare). When these tyres were replaced with Goodyear F1's the exessive twichyness through the steering disappeared and the car felt noticably more stable at speed. On the other was replacement Goodyear F1s only lasted 15000 miles. Despite the long life I would not recommend them.
- Porsche Boxster 2.5
- 255/40 R17 W
- 5,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
- Peugeot 205
- 205/45 R17 W
- 5,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
- BMW E36 328i Sport
- 245/40 R17 V
- 20,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
I really wanted to have Michelin Pilot Sport II's all round, however they were coming in at about ?170 per tyre!
So I was recommended the Marshall KU17 by my trusted tyre fitter.
As he explained, they use the same Silicon technology as the top brands, Goodyear F1's for example, meaning superior grip and wear.
Add to this, the tyre was only ?70 a tyre - and it looked nice enough - very similar in design to the original Michelin Pilot Sport (i.e. Symmetrical).
Having had them fitted and bedded them in, now I have got over the initial 'lets not wear them out so quick this time', I've set to really leaning on them.
And the good news is: They really are very very good. Especially at that cost.
In the wet, perhaps because I'm pushing 200bhp around at the rear, and I'm always looking to move the back around, they don't perhaps have as much grip as I'd like, however they do work well.
They clear water very well, and a fairly quiet.
However dry grip is their party piece.
I simply have to be a nutter to get them sliding, and into corners, setting the car up well, they just grip and grip. Very progressive in their movement across the thread as well.
All in all, as a budget performance tyre, they really are amazing.
Very much recommended, and should Pilot Sport II's still be expensive, I'll be getting more of the same.
No reviews match those filters.
Find your next tyre
All tyre testsThe latest Tyre Reviews tests
- Oct 2026The BEST All Weather Tyres for 2026/27 →
- Oct 2026All Season vs All Terrain Tyres Tested: Do You Actually Need an All Terrain? →
- Oct 2026The BEST Winter Tyres for 2026/27 →
Summer Tyres
All Season Tyres
Winter Tyres
SUV and All Terrain Tyres
Track Tyres
Which tyres do you drive?
You're reading real-world reviews from other drivers - add yours and help the next buyer choose the right tyres.









