Test Publication:
Sport Auto
195/55 R16
11 tyres
4 categories
Test Size:
195/55 R16
Tyres Tested:
11 tyres
Sport Auto is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, Tyre Reviews. This is independent editorial coverage of their published test.
For the 2021 Sport Auto summer tyre test, the German publication have tested eleven tyres in the relatively small 195/55 R16 tyre size. As this tyre size is intended for smaller vehicles such as the Audi A1, Ford Fiesta, Peugeot 208 and other similar sized cars, Sport Auto used a Seat Ibiza for testing, and placed all eleven sets of tyres through the usual dry, wet and environment based tests.
The first and second placed tyres will be no surprise. The Michelin Primacy 4, which always seems to work well in the smaller sizes, dominated both braking tests, was the fastest in wet handling and was the quietest on test. Second placed Bridgestone Turanza T005 had the lowest rolling resistance, and scored well in every other key test, other than a slightly average dry braking result, while the third placed Nokian WetProof lived up to its name and was the fastest around the wet handling lap, but struggled during the dry handling lap.
One other issue with this lower volume tyre size is not all patterns are the most up to date, with the testers having to test the Continental PremiumContact 5 rather than the 6.
Dry
During dry braking, the Michelin Primacy 4 had a large advantage, beating the second placed Maxxis Premitra 5 by nearly a full meter. The next ten tyres were only separated by another 1.9 meters!
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Nokian WetProof
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
- Continental Premium Contact 5
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
- Pirelli Cinturato P1 Verde
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
The new Toyo Proxes Comfort was the fastest around the dry handling lap, with the BFGoodrich Advantage struggling to set a quick time.
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Continental Premium Contact 5
- Nokian WetProof
- Pirelli Cinturato P1 Verde
- BFGoodrich Advantage
Wet
The Primacy 4 continued its braking advantage in the wet, with the sister brand BFGoodrich placing second.
- Michelin Primacy 4
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Continental Premium Contact 5
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
- Nokian WetProof
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Pirelli Cinturato P1 Verde
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
The Primacy 4 was also the fastest around the wet handling lap, but this time tying first place with the Nokian WetProof.
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Nokian WetProof
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Continental Premium Contact 5
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Pirelli Cinturato P1 Verde
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
Falken and Nokian led the way in the straight aquaplaning test.
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Nokian WetProof
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Pirelli Cinturato P1 Verde
- Continental Premium Contact 5
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
Environment
The difference in external noise between the eleven sets was relatively low, with Goodyear, Michelin and Nokian all tying for the quietest tyres on test.
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Nokian WetProof
- Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Continental Premium Contact 5
- Pirelli Cinturato P1 Verde
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
The two most expensive tyres on test offered the lowest rolling resistance, but with the group relatively close it's unlikely they would recover that higher purchase price. As we've seen before, the Falken ZE310 struggled with high rolling resistance.
Surprisingly, Michelin wasn't the most expensive tyre on test, with the Bridgestone 4 euros per tyre more expensive. There is a 184 euro price difference between a full set of the Maxxis and Bridgestone tyres.
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Toyo Proxes Comfort
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
- Nokian WetProof
- Pirelli Cinturato P1 Verde
- Continental Premium Contact 5
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
Results
The Primacy 4 has the shortest braking distances and high safety reserves in the dry and wet. Balanced performance, easily controllable, low noise levels, and low rolling resistance.
Poor aquaplaning resistance, limited comfort.
Very good.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
1st |
36 M |
|
|
100% |
| Dry Handling |
7th |
117.2 Km/H |
118.8 Km/H |
-1.6 Km/H |
98.65% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
1st |
34.6 M |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Handling |
1st |
71 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Straight Aqua |
9th |
78.2 Km/H |
82.6 Km/H |
-4.4 Km/H |
94.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
1st |
70 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Tyre Weight |
4th |
7.76 Kg |
7.48 Kg |
+0.28 Kg |
96.39% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
10th |
107 |
65 |
+42 |
60.75% |
| Rolling Resistance |
1st |
7.6 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
The T005 has very good dry handling with precise stable steering, lowest rolling resistance on test.
Average braking, low aquaplaning resistance.
Very good.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
4th |
37.5 M |
36 M |
+1.5 M |
96% |
| Dry Handling |
2nd |
117.7 Km/H |
118.8 Km/H |
-1.1 Km/H |
99.07% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
3rd |
36.2 M |
34.6 M |
+1.6 M |
95.58% |
| Wet Handling |
4th |
70.5 Km/H |
71 Km/H |
-0.5 Km/H |
99.3% |
| Straight Aqua |
8th |
78.6 Km/H |
82.6 Km/H |
-4 Km/H |
95.16% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
11th |
72.4 dB |
70 dB |
+2.4 dB |
96.69% |
| Tyre Weight |
2nd |
7.53 Kg |
7.48 Kg |
+0.05 Kg |
99.34% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
11th |
111 |
65 |
+46 |
58.56% |
| Rolling Resistance |
1st |
7.6 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
Apart from a slight weakness when braking, the WetProof is very good in the wet with the fastest wet handling lap, and it's also controllable in the dry.
Average wet braking, average rolling resistance.
Very good.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
3rd |
37.1 M |
36 M |
+1.1 M |
97.04% |
| Dry Handling |
9th |
117 Km/H |
118.8 Km/H |
-1.8 Km/H |
98.48% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
6th |
37.9 M |
34.6 M |
+3.3 M |
91.29% |
| Wet Handling |
1st |
71 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Straight Aqua |
2nd |
81.8 Km/H |
82.6 Km/H |
-0.8 Km/H |
99.03% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
1st |
70 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Tyre Weight |
1st |
7.48 Kg |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
5th |
78 |
65 |
+13 |
83.33% |
| Rolling Resistance |
6th |
8.2 kg / t |
7.6 kg / t |
+0.6 kg / t |
92.68% |
The EfficientGrip Performance 2 has good aquaplaning resistance, excellent steering during lane change maneuvers, and good levels of comfort.
Long dry and wet braking distances.
Good.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
8th |
38.1 M |
36 M |
+2.1 M |
94.49% |
| Dry Handling |
3rd |
117.4 Km/H |
118.8 Km/H |
-1.4 Km/H |
98.82% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
6th |
37.9 M |
34.6 M |
+3.3 M |
91.29% |
| Wet Handling |
6th |
70.2 Km/H |
71 Km/H |
-0.8 Km/H |
98.87% |
| Straight Aqua |
3rd |
81.5 Km/H |
82.6 Km/H |
-1.1 Km/H |
98.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
1st |
70 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Tyre Weight |
4th |
7.76 Kg |
7.48 Kg |
+0.28 Kg |
96.39% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
8th |
83 |
65 |
+18 |
78.31% |
| Rolling Resistance |
4th |
7.9 kg / t |
7.6 kg / t |
+0.3 kg / t |
96.2% |
Safe handling balance in the dry and wet.
Long dry braking, average rolling resistance.
Good.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
6th |
37.9 M |
36 M |
+1.9 M |
94.99% |
| Dry Handling |
8th |
117.1 Km/H |
118.8 Km/H |
-1.7 Km/H |
98.57% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
4th |
36.6 M |
34.6 M |
+2 M |
94.54% |
| Wet Handling |
5th |
70.3 Km/H |
71 Km/H |
-0.7 Km/H |
99.01% |
| Straight Aqua |
6th |
80.5 Km/H |
82.6 Km/H |
-2.1 Km/H |
97.46% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
6th |
70.9 dB |
70 dB |
+0.9 dB |
98.73% |
| Tyre Weight |
3rd |
7.74 Kg |
7.48 Kg |
+0.26 Kg |
96.64% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
7th |
82 |
65 |
+17 |
79.27% |
| Rolling Resistance |
6th |
8.2 kg / t |
7.6 kg / t |
+0.6 kg / t |
92.68% |
The Premitra 5 has dynamic and driveable in the dry and wet, low noise.
Long wet braking distances, increased rolling resistance.
Good.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
2nd |
36.9 M |
36 M |
+0.9 M |
97.56% |
| Dry Handling |
3rd |
117.4 Km/H |
118.8 Km/H |
-1.4 Km/H |
98.82% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
5th |
37.7 M |
34.6 M |
+3.1 M |
91.78% |
| Wet Handling |
3rd |
70.8 Km/H |
71 Km/H |
-0.2 Km/H |
99.72% |
| Straight Aqua |
4th |
81.3 Km/H |
82.6 Km/H |
-1.3 Km/H |
98.43% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
5th |
70.3 dB |
70 dB |
+0.3 dB |
99.57% |
| Tyre Weight |
10th |
8.34 Kg |
7.48 Kg |
+0.86 Kg |
89.69% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
1st |
65 |
|
|
100% |
| Rolling Resistance |
9th |
8.5 kg / t |
7.6 kg / t |
+0.9 kg / t |
89.41% |
Good wet braking, stable and surprise free dry handling.
Slightly long dry braking, average aquaplaning, average rolling resistance.
Good.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
6th |
37.9 M |
36 M |
+1.9 M |
94.99% |
| Dry Handling |
11th |
116.3 Km/H |
118.8 Km/H |
-2.5 Km/H |
97.9% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
2nd |
35.8 M |
34.6 M |
+1.2 M |
96.65% |
| Wet Handling |
7th |
69.3 Km/H |
71 Km/H |
-1.7 Km/H |
97.61% |
| Straight Aqua |
7th |
78.8 Km/H |
82.6 Km/H |
-3.8 Km/H |
95.4% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
9th |
71.4 dB |
70 dB |
+1.4 dB |
98.04% |
| Tyre Weight |
7th |
7.87 Kg |
7.48 Kg |
+0.39 Kg |
95.04% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
9th |
93 |
65 |
+28 |
69.89% |
| Rolling Resistance |
5th |
8.1 kg / t |
7.6 kg / t |
+0.5 kg / t |
93.83% |
The Kinergy Eco2 is stable in evasive situations, very quiet, low rolling resistance.
Weak braking in the dry and wet, low grip during wet handling.
Good.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
9th |
38.3 M |
36 M |
+2.3 M |
93.99% |
| Dry Handling |
5th |
117.3 Km/H |
118.8 Km/H |
-1.5 Km/H |
98.74% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
6th |
37.9 M |
34.6 M |
+3.3 M |
91.29% |
| Wet Handling |
8th |
68.7 Km/H |
71 Km/H |
-2.3 Km/H |
96.76% |
| Straight Aqua |
9th |
78.2 Km/H |
82.6 Km/H |
-4.4 Km/H |
94.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
4th |
70.2 dB |
70 dB |
+0.2 dB |
99.72% |
| Tyre Weight |
9th |
7.92 Kg |
7.48 Kg |
+0.44 Kg |
94.44% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
4th |
75 |
65 |
+10 |
86.67% |
| Rolling Resistance |
3rd |
7.7 kg / t |
7.6 kg / t |
+0.1 kg / t |
98.7% |
The EcoRun ZE310 has a very good aquaplaning resistance.
Sluggish steering, very long dry braking, oversteer in the wet, very high rolling resistance.
Good.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
11th |
38.8 M |
36 M |
+2.8 M |
92.78% |
| Dry Handling |
5th |
117.3 Km/H |
118.8 Km/H |
-1.5 Km/H |
98.74% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
9th |
38.5 M |
34.6 M |
+3.9 M |
89.87% |
| Wet Handling |
8th |
68.7 Km/H |
71 Km/H |
-2.3 Km/H |
96.76% |
| Straight Aqua |
1st |
82.6 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
8th |
71.3 dB |
70 dB |
+1.3 dB |
98.18% |
| Tyre Weight |
11th |
8.97 Kg |
7.48 Kg |
+1.49 Kg |
83.39% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
3rd |
74 |
65 |
+9 |
87.84% |
| Rolling Resistance |
11th |
9.9 kg / t |
7.6 kg / t |
+2.3 kg / t |
76.77% |
Good aquaplaning resistance, stable dry balance.
Long braking distances in the dry and wet, high rolling resistance.
Satisfactory.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
10th |
38.4 M |
36 M |
+2.4 M |
93.75% |
| Dry Handling |
10th |
116.8 Km/H |
118.8 Km/H |
-2 Km/H |
98.32% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
10th |
39.8 M |
34.6 M |
+5.2 M |
86.93% |
| Wet Handling |
10th |
68.5 Km/H |
71 Km/H |
-2.5 Km/H |
96.48% |
| Straight Aqua |
5th |
80.9 Km/H |
82.6 Km/H |
-1.7 Km/H |
97.94% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
7th |
71 dB |
70 dB |
+1 dB |
98.59% |
| Tyre Weight |
4th |
7.76 Kg |
7.48 Kg |
+0.28 Kg |
96.39% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
6th |
80 |
65 |
+15 |
81.25% |
| Rolling Resistance |
8th |
8.4 kg / t |
7.6 kg / t |
+0.8 kg / t |
90.48% |
Very good cornering grip in the dry.
Very long dry and wet braking, limited ride comfort. Devaluation due to long wet braking result.
Average.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
5th |
37.6 M |
36 M |
+1.6 M |
95.74% |
| Dry Handling |
1st |
118.8 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
11th |
41.8 M |
34.6 M |
+7.2 M |
82.78% |
| Wet Handling |
11th |
68.2 Km/H |
71 Km/H |
-2.8 Km/H |
96.06% |
| Straight Aqua |
11th |
77.3 Km/H |
82.6 Km/H |
-5.3 Km/H |
93.58% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
10th |
71.7 dB |
70 dB |
+1.7 dB |
97.63% |
| Tyre Weight |
8th |
7.89 Kg |
7.48 Kg |
+0.41 Kg |
94.8% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
2nd |
69 |
65 |
+4 |
94.2% |
| Rolling Resistance |
10th |
8.8 kg / t |
7.6 kg / t |
+1.2 kg / t |
86.36% |
Thanks for this. I need a set of 185/60/15’s for my Audi A2, a car that transmits tyre / road noise into the cabin and can give quite large variations in fuel consumption depending on tyre choice.
All things considered, I’ve gone for your test winner Michelins- I’m hoping that in such a light car the wear I’ll get out of them before performance drops off unacceptably will justify their price.
How would you rank them by comfort? I'm a little confused... Michelin Primacy 4 was always said to be one of the most confort tyres,and maybe Nokian too,but here is nothing told about that neither in Pros or Cons..
I'm about to buy this size for my Nissan Note 2nd gen. but it's a little too hard on poor serbian roads,but i wouls keep these nice 16" rims,so i would choose by comfort level primarly.
Check out my 16 inch test, linked top right
Another great example that the 'same tyre' ain't the same in different sizes. Winner in one size can loose a few points in another one. Still, usually the differences between the leading models in various sizes aren't worrying. More like, interesting to see ;) Nicely done Primacy 4! In other recent tests more like 'comfy, all-round, not excelling in any category' and here - clear winner. Goodyear EGP2 - winner in the most popular size, here close behind. So many conditions play some role in those tests, but still - a good tyre is a good tyre :) Thanks for sharing another fresh test results!
It's a really fascinating year for tyre testing, there's some super interesting results appearing as more are published!
Is the tyre size of this test the 195/65 R15 or the 195/55 R15 (the one we can see bellow the tyres photos)? The website's search engine can't even find the prices for 5 of the them. Jonathan, you probably typed the size incorrectly.
You may have a point, it was actually 195/55 R16! all updated now, thank you.
It was the H speed category tested, could be useful to add.
Some were V, it's listed under each tyre picture :)