Continental ContiCrossContact Winter
WatchThe Continental ContiCrossContact Winter is a Touring All Season tyre designed to be fitted to SUV and 4x4s.
4
Reviews
76%
Average
120,852
miles driven
4
Tests (avg: 3rd)
All Tests
View Test Results4
Tests
3rd
Average
2nd
Best
5th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2013 Toroleo SUV / 4x4 Winter Tyre Test
5th/6
235/65 R17 • 2013
SUV tires with low rolling resistance, convincingly in the dry thanks to stable outer shoulder, xcellent traction with special silica compound
2013 Auto Bild SUV / 4x4 Winter Tyre Test
3rd/10
215/65 R16 • 2013
Balanced and very good performance in snow, lowest rolling resistance in the test
Average performance when braking on wet and dry roads, increased tyre noise
2011 Auto Bild 4x4 Winter Tyre Test
3rd/8
255/55 R18 • 2011
Short braking in the wet, balanced overall performance.
High price, average cornering on snow.
Alternative Tyres
72% 4 reviews
Questions and Answers for the Continental ContiCrossContact Winter
Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Continental ContiCrossContact Winter. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question
We will never publish or share your email address
Top 3 Continental ContiCrossContact Winter Reviews
Given 100%
while driving a
Audi A4 Allroad
(225/45 R17)
on a combination of roads
for 80,000 average miles
Best winter tyre for my car. I had dunlop 4d before this it way good tyre but noisy. This tyre is just perfect for every condition. Exxelent on snow. Traction, braking ... Just best . On wet is wery good too. On dry is best winter tyre for me becouse is quiet. Buy again for sure. Highly reccomend . Sorry for my bad english.
Given 31%
while driving a
Jeep XJ Cherokee
(225/70 R16)
on mostly country roads
for 152 easy going miles
The WORST TIRES I EVER BOUGHT IN MY ENTIRE LIFE!
Expensive and promising a lot, in fact they:
Increased the consummation in 15%.
Quite dangerous with aquaplaning.
A total disaster in mud, they force me to use 4x4 Low in a way where I passed at 4x2 with the old Michelin.
They are ready to change after 30.000 Km.
From BMW, Peugeot, Citroen, Alfa Romeo, Land Rover, UMM, Sport Classic Cars and many others I have always chose between Michelin, Bridgestone and BFGoodrich.
Never doing less than 60 to 70.000 Kms with each set.
(exception for Porsche and Spider naturally "eating" the back wheels)
The Cherokee came with Wrangler. I changed them after 500 Km. Another set of "pieces of rubber" sliding in wet road and a joke in Off-Road.
Now I am thinking about the General Grabber AT (not the older AT2, not bad at all), after drive a Gran Cherokee 4.0 equipped with the Grabber AT2.
Hesitating between these and Michelin or Bridgestone (always a wise Choice).
After 30 years driving and more than 5 million kilometers in all kind of conditions from Africa to Norway and many years between Portugal and Spain, I still feel stupid for spent a fortune in these Continental german tyres.
Expensive and promising a lot, in fact they:
Increased the consummation in 15%.
Quite dangerous with aquaplaning.
A total disaster in mud, they force me to use 4x4 Low in a way where I passed at 4x2 with the old Michelin.
They are ready to change after 30.000 Km.
From BMW, Peugeot, Citroen, Alfa Romeo, Land Rover, UMM, Sport Classic Cars and many others I have always chose between Michelin, Bridgestone and BFGoodrich.
Never doing less than 60 to 70.000 Kms with each set.
(exception for Porsche and Spider naturally "eating" the back wheels)
The Cherokee came with Wrangler. I changed them after 500 Km. Another set of "pieces of rubber" sliding in wet road and a joke in Off-Road.
Now I am thinking about the General Grabber AT (not the older AT2, not bad at all), after drive a Gran Cherokee 4.0 equipped with the Grabber AT2.
Hesitating between these and Michelin or Bridgestone (always a wise Choice).
After 30 years driving and more than 5 million kilometers in all kind of conditions from Africa to Norway and many years between Portugal and Spain, I still feel stupid for spent a fortune in these Continental german tyres.
Given 87%
while driving a
Toyota RAV4
(215/70 R16 T)
on mostly country roads
for 40,000 easy going miles
Very good tyres for winter, but also in summer.
We use them as all season tyres
We use them as all season tyres
Latest Continental ContiCrossContact Winter Reviews
Given 84%
while driving a
Audi Q7
(275/45 R20 V)
on a combination of roads
for 700 spirited miles
Had these fitted just over a week ago and had to cover over 700 miles last weekend. If I'd known how warm it'd be, I'd probably have left my Duelers on, but I'd already made the decision. Was expecting more noise and less grip on warm dry roads than the Bridgestones but grip was exceptional on the fantastic A roads through Scottish borders and Northumbria. Coming back on the M6 road noise was ever so slightly more than I was used to but you'd need to turn the radio off to notice the difference. Obviously don't know how they'll be in the snow and ice but really can't wait to find out. 5* for wear is only because it's too early for me to say. That said, my Q7 chews through tyres at an alarming rate so I'll not be at all surprised if I only get a couple of winters out of them.