Menu

Michelin Latitude Tour

The Michelin Latitude Tour is a Touring All Season tyre designed to be fitted to SUV and 4x4s.

7.0
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
91%
Wet Grip
80%
Road Feedback
77%
Handling
63%
Wear
78%
Comfort
74%
Buy again
64%
Snow Grip
80%
8 Reviews
76% Average
222,500 miles driven
Michelin Latitude Tour

Michelin Latitude Tour

All Season Premium
BETA
7 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 8
Avg Rating: 75.9%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 2.8
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Michelin Latitude Tour

Alternative Tyres

8.0/10
81% 59 reviews
7.5/10
83% 10 reviews
7.2/10
74% 27 reviews
6.9/10
79% 6 reviews
6.6/10
80% 14 reviews
72% 4 reviews
Size Fuel Wet Noise
17 inch
265/65R17 112 S B D 72
P265/65R17 110/0 S B D 72
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Michelin Latitude Tour >>

Questions and Answers for the Michelin Latitude Tour

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Michelin Latitude Tour. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Michelin Latitude Tour Reviews

Given 55% while driving a Land Rover Freelander 2006 (235/60 R18) on mostly country roads for 40,000 easy going miles
The wear went down to 3mm @ 40,000 miles The tread ‘flaked’ on the front driver’s side so had to replace recently rather than next year. Wet and dry expected for Michelins as always was a fan but the handling and steering left and road camber sensitive for 5 years i thought was the Land Rover Freelander’s age. Was going to change car but wife persuaded me to keep car as reliable. Fitted Pirelli Scorpion Verde and wow it steers straight!!! I am fuming with Michelin
May 29, 2023
Given 77% while driving a Hyundai Caligraphy awd 2.5T (/60 R18) on mostly town for 2,500 easy going miles
These tires are rated at 106 weight which is 2000 lbs prox and v rated which is up to 149 mph. They are on a Hyundai Caligraphy with awd and a 2.5T engine. The car is better than some of the muscle cars I had in the '60s. So, maybe the reason it rides hard is the tire is stiffer to handle a bid load and high speeds. Of course I do not go 149 to that is wasted. I am unhappy with the ride. Seems to be stiff, particularly when it is cold. The mfgr states TP should be 35 lbs, so that may be a little high for that size sidewall. The tires I took off were 255/40R 20, and rode very hard. In the '60s, we kept tires inflated at 32 and maybe that is what these tires need. Anyway, after new rims and tires, I am worn out on replacing, so what is, is on these and I am stuck with them for the future. Since I only drive 5,000 miles a year they should last me 10 years. I took them to a fairly steep hill in the pouring rain and slammed the accelerator and with awd the car took off like a rocket, so grip is outstanding.
June 12, 2022
Given 87% while driving a Honda CR V III (225/60 R18) on mostly motorways for 57,000 average miles
Have them on my CRV III since 2014! Done 90.000 km so far without an issue. They grip as day one, the sidewalls are a bit cracky but the tread is still fine that's why I have not replaced them as yet. Mostly highway kms but also some off road although not really tested on snow. Unbelievably quiet, still to day, never had a puncture nor air loss, simply outstanding tyres, will buy them again but cannot find the dimensions anymore, so I will have to settle either for 235/60/18 or 235/55/18.
August 17, 2020

How would you rate the Michelin Latitude Tour?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Michelin Latitude Tour Reviews

Given 61% while driving a Ford Kuga (235/55 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 40,000 average miles
I am a struto-camel ... they have the m + s symbol, but they are not really winter (you can use them if the temperature does not drop below -5 degrees Celsius) ... after 20,000 km, they already seem consumed as the duration life ... I say that I have them mounted on the new car, so the car was equipped by the manufacturer ...
November 5, 2018
Given 80% while driving a Audi Q5 (235/65 R17 H) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
Just got these from friend who did not need them any more with about 70% of life left. I put them on my wife's Audi Q5 tdi. Compared to my previous Contis and Dunlops they seem to be pretty smooth and comfortable with good grip. However if you like a "wide" look while sticking to original dimensions be aware that these Michelins look much narrower than say the Dunlop sport . If you don't care about that then it's an excellent choice.
May 16, 2018
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 93% while driving a Honda CR V III (225/65 R17 T) on mostly country roads for 3,000 spirited miles
Had these tyres fitted just before Christmas to replace the previous Bridgestones which the vehicle came with. I live in a semi rural area and have to pass quarries, which make the roads very wet and muddy for a large part of the year. The tread pattern is more "car like" than the previous 4x4 tyres although these Michelins are M+S rated. The most instant changes I noticed were much quieter, smoother and much better cornering with the car feeling less "stodgy". The ride did feel slightly stiffer, which was a suprise as they are T speed rated and the previous tyres were H rated. The wet and dry grip is good and these tyres combined with part time 4WD easily coped with the 6-7 inches of snow we had.The tyres at £150 each were relatively expensive but with a 600 treadwear rating I expect to get at least 3 years(35-40,000 miles)out of them. Would buy them again.
January 30, 2013
Rate the Michelin Latitude Tour