Menu
Continental CrossContact A/TR View Gallery (1)
205-275/40-85 R15-20 63 sizes 2016

Continental CrossContact A/TR

This specialist tyre for on and off-road driving is initially available in 21 sizes for 15 to 20-inch rims and in widths from 205 to 275 mm with aspect ratios of between 40 and 80 percent. The assortment is scheduled for further expansion early next year. The CrossContact ATR is approved for speeds of up to 240 km/h and suitable for a wide range of SUVs and 4x4 models.

With its on/off-road ratio of 70/30 percent, the new CrossContact ATR is positioned between classic off-highway tires like the ContiCrossContact AT (50/50) and more on-road products like the ContiCrossContact LX 2 (80/20) and PremiumContact 6 (100/0), neatly rounding out Continental's broad portfolio for the SUV and 4x4 segment.

7.3
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
89%
Wet Grip
81%
Road Feedback
83%
Handling
80%
Wear
79%
Comfort
74%
Buy again
76%
7 Reviews
80% Average
208,000 miles driven
Continental CrossContact ATR

Continental CrossContact ATR

Summer Premium
BETA
7.3 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 7
Avg Rating: 80.2%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.12
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Continental CrossContact ATR

Size Fuel Wet Noise
15 inch
235/75 R 15 109 T XL D C 72
235/75 R 15 109 T XL D C 72
17 inch
225/60 R 17 99 H D C 71
235/65 R 17 108 V XL D C 72
265/65 R 17 112 H D C 72
265/70 R 17 115 T D C 72
225/60 R 17 99 H D C 71
265/70R17 115 T B D 72
265/65R17 112 H C D 72
18 inch
235/60 R 18 107 V XL D C 72
235/60 R 18 107 V XL D C 72
235/60R18 107 V XL C C 72
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Continental CrossContact ATR >>

Questions and Answers for the Continental CrossContact ATR

Ask a question
November 28, 2022

I am struggling to choose between the following all terrain tyres for my Range Rover Sport L320. There is not much choice in the tyre size on the car 275/40r20 and I think the choice is the following: General Grabber AT3 Matador MP72 Conti Crosscontact ATR Will be towing trailer with hardcore across UK farmland, maybe field but wet braking on tarmac is important also, and your test of the General Grabber looks scary for that. I am at a loss, the Matador gets some good amateur comments, will the ATR be good enough across the fields Help!!!

I've not tested the ATR, however the tread pattern looks suspiciously like the American market <a href="Tyre/Continental/TerrainContact-AT.htm">TerrainContact AT</a> so it might be worth checking out the test of that.
September 27, 2025

Do these have the 3 peak mountain symbol needed in europe?

No, I don't believe the CrossContact ATRs are 3PMSF marked, but you might want to double check with Continental.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Size Price Range  
Available in 3 tyre sizes - View all.

Top 3 Continental CrossContact ATR Reviews

Given 64% while driving a Toyota RAV4 (225/65 R17) on a combination of roads for 20,000 spirited miles
I understand it's an AT tire but it's very uncomfortable and jarring to drive compared to my Yokohama geolander g015 AT tires I ran before. The snow performance was a disappointment, I definitely don't think these can stay on all winter if you're living in a snowy area. That said, dry grip has been very impressive, and they feel very sure footed and handle confidently. No issue with wet traction either.
December 17, 2024
Given 100% while driving a Mercedes Benz ML (265/45 R20) on a combination of roads for 1,000 spirited miles
The best 4x4 suv tyre I have ever had the pleasure to own, amazing grip in both wet and dry conditions, other cars were aquaplaning recently and this just charged straight through the standing water at 70mph, had solid ice on a gradient (-10 degrees centigrade) and it ploughed straight up the hill in my Mercedes ML, they look the part too with their really good looking tread pattern and sidewall wedges design. The 70/30 mix (70% On road / 30% off-road) ratio means I can leave these tyres on all year round so the massive outlay on them isn't so massive after all. If you can afford them, buy them, your motor deserves the best, you and your safety is paramount so don't be a cheapskate, buy the Continental Cross Contact ATR tyres, replace all 4 tyres with these and rest in the knowledge you have the best tyres available for any SUV/4x4 bar none!
December 17, 2022
Given 99% while driving a Skoda (215/65 R16) on mostly country roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Excellent mixed tire in my eyes, surprisingly efficient in the rain, not tested in snow, otherwise no complaints, perhaps a slight increase in consumption compared to previous summer increases.
March 27, 2022

How would you rate the Continental CrossContact ATR?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Continental CrossContact ATR Reviews

Given 89% while driving a Subaru Forester (225/60 R17) on a combination of roads for 82,000 average miles
Have had these tyres for 4 years and counting on a Forester. Have done over 130,000 Km so far. These tyres are exceptional. Still have roughly 3-4mm of tread all around at the moment. Have driven in all conditions. All performance good, with snow performance exceptional. Everyday road performance seems perfect. Wet performance is pretty good, haven’t had any issues anyway. Efficiency seems pretty good, didn’t perform any worse than stock geolander tyres.
November 14, 2021
Given 31% while driving a Land Rover Discovery 4 (255/55 R19) on mostly town for 27,000 average miles
DO NOT BUY. CONTINENTAL DOES NOT STAND BEHIND WARRANTY. Tires lasted approximately 27k miles, very light, around the town driving. Called to complain about the lack of mileage and to ask about the 60k mile warranty. Was given the run around by Joe. Continental wants you to jump through hoops and to buy there tires again before they decide if they will prorate old tires. Side not, dealership who installed tires also contacted Continental and was given same runaround.
June 30, 2021
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 97% while driving a Toyota fortuner (265/65 R17) on a combination of roads for 48,000 spirited miles
Very good in my experince, still using the tire for more than 70k milage now and still looking good with nitro. Will be changing it when i reach to 80k next week.. with proper rotation every 10k milage the tire speaks for itself.. 100% satisfied customer.
June 20, 2020
Given 81% while driving a Nissan Qashqai (225/60 R17) on mostly country roads for 20,000 spirited miles
Excellent tyre for on and off road use. Very good in dry conditions. Very good traction in wet conditions but not so good in hydroplanning. Exceptional in snow, almost as good as a snow tyre. Very good traction in gravel and mud as well. Tread wear seems very satisfying for the moment. My only choice for years to come, better than any allterrain i have tryied.
April 18, 2019
Rate the Continental CrossContact ATR