Menu

Falken Azenis RT660

Falken's new rigid carcass construction enhances steering response and vehicle stability, while the motorsports-inspired tread compound provides unmatched grip for those who prioritize peak performance above all else. The track-ready RT660 is DOT-approved, saving drivers the hassle of swapping tires before each track day. Designed to heighten the connection between road and driver, and available in a wider range of fitments than its predecessor, the Falken AZENIS RT660 invites more enthusiasts to experience the difference.

The quick answer

Owners say 80% from 4 owner reviews Read the reviews
Tests say 2nd average finish across 2 independent tests Latest: P2 of 11 · 2022 See every test

Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tyre - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated January 2025.

  • 4owner reviews
  • 34,003miles driven
  • 2professional tests

Tyre Reviews Score

Falken Azenis RT660

8.2/10

Better than 69% of track and competition tyres

  • Limited Confidence
  • 2 tests
  • 4 owner reviews
Scores of the 48 track and competition tyres we have tested

How this score is built

Source Better than Weight
Independent tests2 tests · 2 publications · 2021-2022 69% 100%
Owner reviewsFewer than 5 reviews, so they do not count yet – 0%
Combined 69% 8.2

A fixed curve turns the combined figure into the 0 to 10 score, so roughly the top 10% of a group score 9 or more.

Category by category

How it compares with other track and competition tyres in each area, and how much each area counts. 50 is the middle of the group.

Category Better than Weight Tests
DryBraking and handling on dry roads 75% 63% 2
WetBraking, handling and aquaplaning in the wet Not tested, counted as average 37% –

Faded bars rest on one or two tests.

By discipline

The same results grouped by what the tyre was doing. They are not counted a second time.

HandlingEvery handling test, on any surface 76% 2

Confidence

  1. Limited
  2. Medium
  3. High

Its own test results decide 59% of the test figure. The other 41% is the average for its group, and it shrinks as more tests arrive.

High needs at least 3 tests, with its own results deciding 90% or more. Medium needs 2 tests and 70%. Anything less is Limited: expect the number to move as tests arrive.

The tests behind it

  1. 2022 2022 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test Tire Rack · 225/45 R17 P2 / 11
  2. 2021 2021 Track Day 200TW Tyre Test Tyre Reviews · 225/45 R17 P2 / 8

Tested 2 times by independent publications, the Falken Azenis RT660 averages a finish of 2nd.

2 Tests
0 Test Wins
2nd Average
2nd Best
2nd Worst
The latest test

2022 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test P2 of 11

The Falken Azenis RT660 was second fastest on average, a sharp and grippy tyre that rewards smooth steering. Drivers who are quick with their hands will need to adapt to how alert the front end is.

Strong: Dry Handling Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS

Every independent test of the Falken Azenis RT660, newest first
YearTestResultAward
20222022 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre TestTire Rack · 225/45 R17P2 / 11
20212021 Track Day 200TW Tyre TestTyre Reviews · 225/45 R17P2 / 8Tested by Tyre Reviews Highly Rec.

Videos

What are the BEST 200TW Tires?

What are the BEST 200TW Tires?

Awards
Highly Recommended
2021 Track Day 200TW Tyre Test
2021 · 225/45 R17
Frequently Asked Questions
How good is the Falken Azenis RT660 in the dry?
The Falken Azenis RT660 has a Tyre Reviews dry score of 75/100, and owners rate it 10/10 in the dry from 4 reviews.
Owner Questions
Ask a question

Questions and Answers for the Falken Azenis RT660

Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Falken Azenis RT660. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!

Falken Azenis RT660 Owner Reviews

Review this tyre

What owners say

Across 4 owner ratings the Falken Azenis RT660 averages 80%. Owners rate Dry Grip highest at 10 out of 10 and Comfort lowest at 4. 1 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles.

Owner ratings averaged from 4 ratings

  • Owner score 80%
  • Dry Grip 100%
  • Road Feedback 95%
  • Handling 95%
  • Wear 73%
  • Wet Grip 58%
  • Comfort 40%

Featured reviews

Most helpful 77%

“For a 200 treadwear tire the RT660s did better than I expected. Over two years and approximately six autocross schools and test and tunes along with a couple thousand road miles these tires held up well and exceeded the...”

  • Mazda MX5
  • 3,000 miles
Read full review → 825 found this helpful
Longest term 87%

“I use the tires for the complete opposite of they're intended use. I drive about 45000km's per year in my 2014 Ford Fiesta ST with now 340000km's on it and these are by far the best tires I have ever fitted to it. The...”

  • Ford fiesta st
  • 30,000 miles
Read full review → 925 found this helpful

All 4 Falken Azenis RT660 reviews

Score spread across 4 written reviews
77%
Member
For a 200 treadwear tire the RT660s did better than I expected. Over two years and approximately six autocross schools and test and tunes along with a couple thousand road miles these tires held up well and exceeded the performance expectations I had. During fast road driving they really didn’t show any negative behaviors, they just stuck. While not my first choice for driving in the rain, the few times they were driven in the rain they really handled it OK. The only downside that I noticed is that anytime you run over a painted stripe on the road or a slick piece of pavement, the tire tread makes a very distinctive noise. The first time I drove on them I actually thought I left wheel nuts loose and pulled over to check torque. Just like all 200 tread wear tires, they pick up every pebble and sand you encounter in parking lots (or your gravel driveway) and throw it into your wheel liner. This is just the cost of super sticky tires, but understand that going in.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 5
  • Road Feedback 10
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 6
  • Comfort 4
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 825
87%
Member
I use the tires for the complete opposite of they're intended use. I drive about 45000km's per year in my 2014 Ford Fiesta ST with now 340000km's on it and these are by far the best tires I have ever fitted to it. The grip is unbelievable in the dry, especially if you get a little bit of heat in them. You can feel the tires grab the road as you get heat in them, it's is uncanny. The wet performance is surprisingly good for a tire of this design, despite the aggressiveness of the tire it handles very well in damp/wet conditions in my opinion. However, obviously if it is really wet with standing water you will hydroplane, especially in a small light car. The wear compared to the Falken Azenis RT615 is amazing. I am on my second summer with them and still can get some more use out of them next summer, which is crazy for a 200 treadwear rating tire. Comfort, you aren't buying these tires for comfort, and my car isn't one to comment on that either.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 6
  • Road Feedback 10
  • Handling 10
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 5
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 925
76%
Member
For 2021 I needed new tires for autocross and with the RE71R no longer available, my shopping list was pretty short; the RT660 or the Yokahama A052. Both tires have had reports of not being happy on front-wheel drive, camber limited cars like my GTI. Between the two tires my autocross contacts recommended the RT660, and I decided to gamble on them. After all my experience being on the RE71R, I was a bit nervous. The RT660s did not disappoint. Positives - Good feedback though I miss the on -center feel and stiff sidewalls of the RE71R - Grip! I was pushing through a large sweeper at full throttle. I expected to lose grip and possibly spin, only to be pleasantly surprised. Negatives - Not much given my narrow expectations. - Accelerated wear. I will not get two seasons of autocross out of these like I did the RE71Rs After about 100 runs I have zero signs of tire chunking or delamination. I am extremely careful about my tire pressures, which in my case are generally 44 front and 39-40 rear. Tire wear is high, so I will not get two seasons of use out of these tires. I did have them flipped on the wheels and I rotated front/rear, but autocross is hard on tires. I will buy the RT660s again.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 6
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 6
  • Comfort 4
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 854

Which tyres do you drive?

Researching the Falken Azenis RT660? Rate the tyres you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.

Own the Falken Azenis RT660?
80%
Member
Stage 3 turbo w/ a mild tune. 17x7.5 SSR Comp-C wheels for a good fitment. These were bought to replace a well overdue set of Hanook RS-3 tires of the same size. I originally wanted to get their RS-4 tire, but couldn't find any in stock. After some searching, and several online reviews, I took a chance and "settled" on these Falken RT660 tires. "Settled" was the wrong thought about these tires. They are, quite frankly, amazing, but with some tradeoffs. At least in this application, they are very sensitive to setup. Alignment needs to be spot on the factory recommended specs, air pressures need to be tightly monitored (OEM is 32psi all around, but the rear end tends to oversteer at those pressures; 32psi front/28psi rear seems to be the sweet spot so far.) These characteristics are both a curse and a blessing. Once you get everything dialed in they will reward you with an insane level of grip. Lately I've pushed them pretty hard (maybe even too hard) on non-closed-course areas, and have yet to find the upper level of grip. I desperately need an event where I can explore the lofty capabilities these tires are exhibiting. In terms of noise level though, these the most "chatty" tire I've ever experienced. They "chirp" over every piece of seam sealer out there, and will frankly howl like the devil on the highway. Luckily, rolling the windows mostly up (or going faster, so wind noise drowns them out!) takes care of the problem nicely. While I ranked the "comfort" level relatively low above, I do not consider it so sufficiently evil that I regret the choice. In terms foul weather performance, this is my "toy" car, so it generally doesn't see anything other than bright and sunny days. That being said, I did get caught out by a particularly bad weather forecast, and was struck by some rather substantial rain. While I didn't drive with my usual zest, I none the less did not feel out of control in any way, at posted speeds. For fun at a traffic light I explored the levels of grip available for launching. It was more than adequate. As such I rated the wet grip just a bit above neutral. Short of being at a paid for event that receives precipitation, I won't be able to expand upon the wet weather characteristics. In terms of general wear, I didn't particularly baby these tires after initial install, but as of late have been even more spirited in their use. Visual evidence of such is not appearing yet, so they are at least handling my use quite well so far. One final note about the tires themselves. I do not know if it's the general norm for Falken's tires, but when these were mounted (and mounted properly; the shop put the yellow dot at the valve stem) 3 assemblies balanced perfectly (0 weight added) and 1 assembly has 0.25oz total weight added. I've NEVER had that happen before, so well done to Falken for that. Overall, I am extremely pleased with my purchase and would highly recommend them.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 6
  • Road Feedback 10
  • Handling 10
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 3
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 869
Find your next tyre
All tyre tests
Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.