Menu
Marshal Matrac MH11 View Gallery (1)

Marshal Matrac MH11

Marshal Tyres High Performance Summer

The Marshal Matrac MH11 is a High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.5
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
92%
Wet Grip
64%
Road Feedback
88%
Handling
80%
Wear
88%
Comfort
76%
Buy again
70%
5 Reviews
80% Average
27,050 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 37th)
Marshal Matrac MH11

Marshal Matrac MH11

Summer Economy
BETA
6.5 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2015
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 5
Avg Rating: 79.6%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 1.95
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2015 Market Overview - Braking Test Auto Bild 2015 185/60 R15 37/52 0 metrics
All Tests
View Test Results
1
Tests
37th
Average
37th
Best
37th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2015 Market Overview - Braking Test
185/60 R15 • 2015
37th/52

Questions and Answers for the Marshal Matrac MH11

Ask a question
April 13, 2021

What is the treadwear, traction and temperature?

Sorry, I don't have that data for the MH11 in any sizes.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Marshal Matrac MH11 Reviews

Given 76% while driving a Peugeot 1.4 HDi (185/65 R15 T) on a combination of roads for 250 average miles
Our local dealer did nor have size in khumo so recommended these for rear of my electrical van in xl and i did notice an increase of stopping distance @ first against the worn continentals .
But they have now worn in a bit and being a firmer rubber van not rolling so much and we don't speed in it , so should wear well on the bipper . Will see how they wear and if breaking distance improves when softened up a bit and less side wall bulge when van loaded with kit and ladders .
Ask a question | Helpful 543
April 17, 2016
Given 52% while driving a MG MGF NON VVC (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 10,000 spirited miles
I had two of these tyres on my MGF they were on the front. The car tracked all over the Road, quite disconcerting! changed them to the rear and they behaved much better, however they seem to be constructed from very hard material and are useless in the Wet, beware.
Ask a question | Helpful 558
May 4, 2012
Given 91% while driving a Honda Civic (195/55 R15) on mostly country roads for 8,600 spirited miles
I had these On my civic EK4 as a midrange tyre, and it really does do evrything, very very good dry grip on the limit, very good feedback and comfy ride, the only thing that lets them down is there not the best in the wet, but then no tyre is amazing in the wet, a really good all rounder tyre and a very good price, equally as good as the top named brands for a fraction of the cost, my next set of tyres will be matrac's! for the price and performance you cant beat them
Ask a question | Helpful 523
April 6, 2012
Have you driven on the Marshal Matrac MH11 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Marshal Matrac MH11? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Marshal Matrac MH11 >

Latest Marshal Matrac MH11 Reviews

Given 84% while driving a Citroën berlingo (185/65 R15) on mostly country roads for 200 average miles
hi i have only had these fitted a few days but i am quite impressed so far,i have just replaced dunlop after 14 months(13000 mls )which i was not very impressed with,there was a lot of road noise and not very good grip in the wet !I am very impressed with the marshal tyres i on the car at the moment at around ?20.00 less per tyre,will have to see how they go.
Ask a question | Helpful 542
October 11, 2009