Renault Laguna 3 Tyres

On this page you will find the best real world tyre reviews from owners of the Renault Laguna 3.

Do you Drive a Renault Laguna 3? Why not add your own tyre review and help other owners pick the right tyre! After all, who knows what the best tyre for a Laguna 3 better than the owners?

Tyre Reviewed Dry Grip Wet Grip Feedback Handling Wear Comfort
Michelin CrossClimate Plus (109) 87% 86% 82% 74% 87% 87%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport (84) 93% 88% 90% 92% 64% 74%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 (303) 91% 88% 81% 84% 73% 78%
Uniroyal RainSport 2 (226) 85% 91% 78% 76% 76% 80%
Michelin CrossClimate (141) 88% 85% 83% 80% 84% 89%
Vredestein Quatrac 3 (48) 81% 86% 78% 75% 76% 76%
Nokian WR A3 (75) 92% 87% 88% 82% 90% 91%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 (80) 84% 76% 76% 79% 67% 72%
Matador MP 47 Hectorra 3 (28) 80% 66% 74% 76% 73% 79%
Giti GitiSynergy E1 (1) 80% 70% 70% 70% 60% 70%
Dunlop SP Sport 01 (124) 78% 67% 71% 69% 69% 65%
Kumho IZen KW27 (30) 75% 75% 73% 71% 80% 83%
Tristar All Season Power (2) 70% 60% 70% 75% 65% 75%
Dayton D320 (9) 78% 60% 60% 54% 60% 70%
Sunew YS618 (58) 60% 35% 46% 44% 52% 48%

Renault Laguna 3 Tyre Review Highlights

Writing about the Giti GitiSynergy E1 given 69% (205-60-16-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 12000 average miles
No bad but I am not happy too. Works well but the front tires wear off after 12000 miles as the normal should be at least 20000. As summer tires very bad at snow/ice but previously I had an other Chinese, cheaper brand of summer tires, and it was a lot better at snow/ice than this ones. If you find them around 30% cheaper or less than premium summer tires looks like a good choice but my next choice will be all weather tires.
tyre reviewed on 2022-12-25 15:43:52
Writing about the Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 given 51% (225-45-18-)
Driving on mostly motorways for 25000 spirited miles
Second Hankook tires and a big disappointment. Grip in the dry is average while in the wet they are catastrophic. They slide in corners both fast and slow, there is simply no grip. Winter tires have far more wet grip. Never again Hankook.
tyre reviewed on 2022-10-21 20:52:58
Writing about the Bridgestone Potenza Sport given 84% (225-45-18-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 15000 spirited miles
I had it as front tyres for about 4 months on a modified Renault laguna making around 220hp and that's how much they lived. The dry grip was excellent and even the wet was ok. If the wear wasn't so bad, would recommend it.
tyre reviewed on 2022-09-29 19:38:53
Writing about the Tristar All Season Power given 43% (205-60-16-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 8000 easy going miles
Cheap tyre, nothing really good about it. Comfort and noise is ok I guess. After 5000 miles tread was already visibly deteriorated, grip was never good, dry or wet. On the positive side, unlike most tyres I don't feel these have gotten worse with mileage. Didn't get any punctures, and no deformation/no need for rebalancing, so I guess they are not completely terrible.
tyre reviewed on 2022-05-31 12:32:59
Writing about the Michelin CrossClimate Plus given 89% (225-45-18-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 10000 average miles
Bought these tires in May of 2020 and they were fitted on Renault Laguna III 2.0 DCI 127kw automatic with 4 control. I live in Serbia where we have very hot summers and ~mild winters (it's usually 10-15 days of real snow). And all I can say is that they were/are awesome!! Very comfortable and reasonable quiet. The feel during the summer months was almost the same as with the prior Hankook summer tires (just my subjective feeling). They've also replaced Hankook winter tires. Last winter was without the snow altogether. But this winter we had really sudden snow, just when I was in the mountains. Was afraid at first but man o man, they were great. The grip was exceptional, even on mounting roads that were just covered with fresh snow. Now I'm selling the car and I'm thinking of buying CC 2 for my next one, guessing they will feel even better.
tyre reviewed on 2022-03-12 18:30:44
Writing about the Michelin CrossClimate given 83% (225-45-17-)
Driving on mostly country roads for 1500 average miles
No comments left
tyre reviewed on 2020-07-08 18:19:32
Writing about the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 given 94% (225-45-18-W)
Driving on mostly motorways for 10000 miles
strongly recommend
tyre reviewed on 2017-11-06 16:41:03
Writing about the Vredestein Quatrac 3 given 71% (225-45-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 14000 easy going miles
I bought 4 Quatrac 3s for my Renault Laguna 3 to cope with the winters in the Pennines of N England - lots of long steep hills, sharp bends and narrow roads, and snow every winter. Performance was very good - grip quite satisfactory in wet and dry (though I'm a cautious driver), but excellent in snow even on steep hills - in fact I had to try very hard to make them slip even on snow. They've gone through two winters, and about 14,000 miles - and the front pair now need replacing. They wear quicker than summer tyres (which are totally hopeless round here in the winter), but then, that's the trade-off.
tyre reviewed on 2016-03-16 23:07:16
Writing about the Matador MP 47 Hectorra 3 given 80% (225-45-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 5000 average miles
No comments left
tyre reviewed on 2016-03-07 11:54:52
Writing about the Dayton D320 given 78% (225-55-16-)
Driving on mostly motorways for 3000 easy going miles
I am using those tyres on my Renault Laguna III phase 2 for about 6 months. Easy going highway driving, destinations Sarajevo-Sofia-Istanbul, Sarajevo-Geneva, Sarajevo-Athens, or Sarajevo-Sofia-Bucharest. Do not get me wrong, I am very law obeying driver, no sanctions for the last 15 years at all, I keep the speed limits, and I seldom speed more than 140 km/h, sorry, this is my style. Have to replace my winter "Continentals", and the local garage in Sarajevo offered me this brand. Price is ~75.00 E/piece, mounting + balance included. Driving is perfect in dry or wet on highways, a bit more "bumpy" than my old Summer "Bridgestone Turanza"s, but this is felt exclusively out of highways only. Handling is good, fuel consumption in average is a bit higher than the Bridgestones", but not heavily damaging my pocket. I am leaving "progressiveness" & "wear" boxes just empty, cannot make a fair judgement for just couple of weeks. Also "by again" is empty - I like this brand, but could be that a cheaper brand will appear soon in my garage's stock, who knows? Bottom line - reliable tyre with great price/quality ratio.
tyre reviewed on 2014-06-01 20:03:09
Writing about the Kumho IZen KW27 given 79% (215-55-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 10000 average miles
Good comfort and good wear. Nice tyre for the price if you are not a racer.
tyre reviewed on 2014-03-21 16:16:59
Writing about the Uniroyal RainSport 2 given 53% (215-50-17-W)
Driving on mostly motorways for 3000 average miles
to soft sidewall! it's good in the rain but many other tyres perform the same!
I will never buy this tyre again. it's not bad if you like soft sidewall, but i don't!
tyre reviewed on 2013-05-09 13:34:22
Drive this car? Why not add your own tyre review and help other owners pick the right tyre