Continental ContiCrossContact LX
The Continental ContiCrossContact LX is a Premium Touring All Season tyre designed to be fitted to SUV and 4x4
This tyre has been replaced by the Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Show All
Tyre review data from 13 tyre reviews averaging 69% over 277,100 miles driven.
Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Continental ContiCrossContact LX
Size |
Fuel |
Wet |
Noise |
Weight |
215/65 R16 98H XL DA |
E |
C |
72 |
10.73kgs |
215/65 R16 98H XL DA |
E |
C |
71 |
10.52kgs |
255/70 R16 111T XL |
E |
C |
73 |
16.49kgs |
255/70 R16 111T XL |
E |
C |
72 |
16.59kgs |
225/65 R17 102T XL |
C |
C |
72 |
11.08kgs |
225/65 R17 102T |
B |
C |
71 |
11.27kgs |
245/65 R17 111T XL |
E |
E |
72 |
16.36kgs |
255/60 R18 112V XL |
C |
C |
73 |
15.50kgs |
265/60 R18 110T XL |
E |
C |
72 |
17.93kgs |
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Continental ContiCrossContact LX. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question
We will never publish or share your email address
Top Continental ContiCrossContact LX Review
Given
89%
while driving a
Honda CRV
(225/65 R17 T) on
a combination of roads
for 40,000
easy going miles
This is the second set of tyres from new, & a change of pattern from the originally fitted tyres which wore out at 15k miles. I bought these on a deal, and I am changing one pair after 25k miles. I have been pleased overall with these tyres but I am a little fed up with the tendency of Continental tyres wearing unevenly, this is the fourth set of continentals on all model cars I have owned.
Latest Continental ContiCrossContact LX Reviews
Given
64%
while driving a
Ford Ranger
(265/60 R18 T) on
a combination of roads
for 20,000
average miles
The tyres were good initially but after approximately 5000 miles they started to become vague, especially during wet cornering. This reduces driving speeds in the wet.
The tyres are wearing very well, with the tread even across all four tyres. The tyres probably have about 50% life remaining which is excellent. They are standing up well to rough roads and to potholes.
Given
80%
while driving a
Honda CRV
(225/65 R17 H) on
a combination of roads
for 30,000
easy going miles
Great tyre. Good dry and wet grip. Excellent aquaplanning resistance, feels very safe. Good fuel consumption rating ... A little noisy on motorways ...
Would buy again but probably replaced by LX2?
Trying to pick the very best winter tyre? Watch this!
Given
80%
while driving a
Honda 1.6 I DTEC
(225/65 R17 T) on
mostly country roads
for 27,000
spirited miles
These Continental Cross Contact LX on my CRV were the original OEM tyre fitted. I have fitted another two pairs since I bought the vehicle new. First front pair lasted 23,000 miles, then fitted four new all round at 50,000 miles. The Continentals wear quicker than the Michelins on my previous CRV I owned, but give far more grip in the wet and the dry. In snow they are reasonably good, although not up to the standard of a full winter tyre. They are relatively quiet, give reasonable feedback and I will certainly be buying them again when the need arises.
Given
70%
while driving a
Renault Koleos
(225/60 R17 H) on
a combination of roads
for 18,000
average miles
Good in all aspects. Perhaps it has coincided that I punctured more than with other tires. A little weak in compound and sidewalls.
I have had the factory installed Continental Cross Contact Sport tires on my 2013 Mercedes ML 350. This is the second ML 350 I have owned. In total I have had 5 sidewall failures on the Continental tires. I have used both Micheline and Pirelli tires as replacement tires on these vehicles and never had a problem.
Granted I take my vehicle on gravel roads to a fishing club I belong to but I have been going there for over 30 years as have 40 other members and I have never had a problem with any other vehicle or tire combination. No other member has ever had a sidewall failure. Both Mercedes and Continental refuse to take this issue seriously. I can only imagine that the Continental tires are poorly constructed or they are inadequate for this vehicle.