Menu
Rockstone Radial F105 View Gallery (1)
195-255/30-55 R16-20 81 sizes 2007

Rockstone Radial F105

The Rockstone Radial F105 is a High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

4.2
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
38%
Wet Grip
20%
Road Feedback
33%
Handling
30%
Wear
54%
Comfort
36%
Buy again
21%
25 Reviews
33% Average
392,000 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 50th)
Rockstone Radial F105

Rockstone Radial F105

Summer Budget
BETA
4.2 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2012
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 25
Avg Rating: 33%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 1.36
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2012 Autobild 50 Tyre Braking Test Auto Bild 2012 225/45 R17 50/45 0 metrics
1
Tests
50th
Average
50th
Best
50th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
50th/45
Size Fuel Wet Noise
16 inch
205/55R16 91 W D C 71
17 inch
205/50R17 93 W XL D C 71
215/45R17 91 W XL D C 71
215/55R17 98 W XL C C 71
225/45R17 94 W XL C C 71
205/50R17 93 W XL D C 71
215/45R17 91 W XL D C 71
215/55R17 98 W XL C C 71
225/45R17 94 W XL C C 71
225/50R17 98 W XL C C 71
205/50R17 93 W XL D C 71
18 inch
225/40R18 92 W XL D C 71
245/40R18 97 W XL C C 71
255/35R18 94 W XL C C 71
225/40R18 92 W XL D C 71
245/40R18 97 W XL C C 71
245/45R18 100 W XL C C 71
255/35R18 94 W XL C C 71
245/40R18 97 W XL C C 71
245/45R18 100 W XL C C 71
19 inch
235/35R19 91 W XL D C 71
235/35R19 91 W XL D C 71
235/35R19 91 W XL D C 71
20 inch
245/35R20 95 W XL C C 71
245/35R20 95 W XL C C 71
245/35R20 95 W XL C C 71
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Rockstone Radial F105 >>

Questions and Answers for the Rockstone Radial F105

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Rockstone Radial F105. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Rockstone Radial F105 Reviews

Given 41% while driving a Toyota MK2 MR2 NA (215/40 R17) on mostly town for 30,000 average miles
DO NOT BUY THESE TYRES. I don't take my car out in the wet because it. Wet roads wheels spins at 10km/hr in the straight, very embarrassing and more importantly DANGEROUS.In dry conditions slips in straight brakings from 60km/hr to stop in 40m with gradual braking. THESE ARE SAFETY HAZZARD TYRES. Toyota mr2 sw20 na. 50%tread left on tyres
Ask a question | Helpful 854
March 22, 2019
Given 53% while driving a Holden cruze (225/40 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 20,000 easy going miles
I know what top tyres feel like and top tyres are a dream. I bought a brand new car that had rockstone tyres. I did not Google about rockstone before I drove so trusted what I had on my car. Naive I know. However I did not slow down. I drove hard and fast. Although I knew these tyres were not the best in wet I thought they were ok tyres. Long lasting. I overtook vehicles, drove new Zealand roads like I stole the car and felt fine. Maybe I'm a good driver. But after these reviews maybe I will change. 40000 km still 20000 to go maybe. No punctures.
August 1, 2015
Given 20% while driving a Vauxhall Insignia CDTI 160 (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 10,000 average miles
Very poor tyre. Were fitted to the car when i got it guess they were cheap were aufull in almost every respect. noisy no grip and unpredictable. My advice is dont buy them.
March 2, 2015
Have you driven on the Rockstone Radial F105 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Rockstone Radial F105? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Rockstone Radial F105 >

Latest Rockstone Radial F105 Reviews

Given 36% while driving a Mitsubishi Colt (175/65 R14) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
Dry driving is ok, Wet driving is DANGEROUS. These tyres let go so suddenly in the wet at only 15mph turning into a side road ?!?!?! Please avoid if you value your life, there are much better alternatives.
Do your homework !
April 27, 2016
Given 60% while driving a Ford Falcon BF (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 40,000 easy going miles
As others have said. These tyres are MURDEROUS in the wet, I've had so many near misses with these. O the other hand I have not found them noisy or anything less than adequate in the dry, and I have had 70000 Ks out of them and only a bad alignment is causing me to replace them. I reckon that 100000 Ks might be possible with these tyres they show so little wear. But the main point to reiterate is they are TERRIBLE in the wet. If you can afford something better then you must buy it. CAR: Ford Falcon BA Mk1
March 13, 2015
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 23% while driving a Holden commodore (225/55 R16) on mostly town for 120,000 average miles
Recently bought a 2004 Holden utility fitted with these tyres. Everything was fine until it started to rain. Very little rear grip on cornering, this is like trying to drive a roller skate... very dangerous.
I am getting new Dunlops fitted tomorrow I'm fond of living.
January 28, 2015
Given 60% while driving a Honda Civic Type R (205/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 1,000 easy going miles
Dangerously bad from day one, mine are nowhere near worn out but I'm having to change them,as I quite like living.
January 22, 2015
Given 11% while driving a Vauxhall Insignia CDTI 160 (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 5,000 spirited miles
I have two of these on my car, along with a Rotella and a Sunew. It seems that the three of these combined is a potent combination. Potent as in the smell off my undies when I realize how dangerous it now was to drive at 140km/h in the rain on these!

I will be changing asap as I have also had the pleasure of ice skating around roundabouts and bends. I don't know how much mileage is on them nor do I ever want to know.

They are just horrendous.
October 22, 2014
Given 30% while driving a Honda Civic Type R (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 3,000 average miles
If you enjoy going backways up a road at 60mph in the wet buy these tyres they are tremendous fun, tyres do not heat up whatsoever after hard driving, thankfully i had proper tyres on the front. One advantage is they dont seem to wear what so ever
May 9, 2014
Given 29% while driving a Holden SS Commodore (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 40,000 average miles
on the front, heaps of under steer, scary in the wet. black ice scary. on the back in the wet very entertaining, but frustrating if your in a hurry. lucky i had 2 tyres on the car and not a set of four
December 31, 2013
Given 34% while driving a BMW Alpina d3 (265/30 R19) on mostly motorways for 10,000 average miles
I wish I'd never bought these tyres! If you want a skid pan experience just buy a set. In the wet I'm going round every roundabout totally sideways at 10mph. At first I thought somebody must be coating my tyres in grease overnight for a laugh but it's been going on for too long now. I can only describe the wet handing as if driving a car on rims with no tyres at all! One time I actually stopped to check the tyres hadn't come off! They were still there, hard as ever and laughing in my face daring me to get back in the car!! As long as you don't mind writing off your car and yourself they do last forever. You can smoke them out on the spot all day and I guarantee the Tarmac will give up before the tyre they are that hardy. Hardy is great as long as you are hardy enough yourself to get out of your burning wreck of a car!! I've recently upgraded to sunew.
December 15, 2013
Given 21% while driving a BMW (235/45 R17 W) on mostly country roads for 1,000 average miles
The character of my car has completely changed since fitting these tyres. Previously quiet and controllable to noisy and unpredictable. Rockstone is an apt name for them. They feel rock hard and it's like driving on stones. They must be bad for me to write a review. These tyres should not be sold.
I inherited a set of alloys with these tyres fitted, my previous tyres having been Falkens. Dry grip is soso with a tendency to slip on manhole covers expansion joints on bridges etc. The grip in the wet is atrocious bordering on downright dangerous, and coupled with the banging and crashing noises that are transmitted through to the cabin I seriously thought that all the suspension and steering linkages were loose. I have zero confidence in these tyres in the wet and will be replacing them as soon as possible. At 50mph on damp country roads they will oversteer on corners and step out on white lines. I am 58 and have driven a huge variety of car tyre combinations. 'My 1955 land-rover series 1 with crossply tyres has better grip. I drive a BMW e39 525dse.
May 4, 2013
Given 29% while driving a Vauxhall monaro (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 500 spirited miles
Had to buy these tyres in an emergency as a result of a blow out and only having a foam fix kit that would not do the job.
There's are budget tyres good for going on your gran's car who never goes over 30mph or drives in the wet.
Now for me they did offer some surprising grip off the line for my Vauxhall monaro but I did not have the bottle to push them in the corners but for the wet, OMG!!!! With or with out the traction control on they was like having wooden wheels on ice. These tyres are now off my car having done less than 500 mile (so if you want to buy them they are on eBay)
In short if you drive slow and careful all the time and price is the biggest factor for you there will probably make you happy. If you drive like you stole the car you will not be happy.
April 23, 2013
Given 36% while driving a Isuzu KB 280 DT 4x4 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 6,000 easy going miles
wet grip is terrible and you can feel each bad point in the road
March 14, 2013
Given 26% while driving a MG ZT Plus 135 (tuned) (225/45 R18) on mostly country roads for 5,000 spirited miles
yikes, you will need new underpants in the wet. Never again......
please please don't do it
February 14, 2013