Rockstone Radial F105
The Rockstone Radial F105 is a High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Car
Show All
Tyre review data from 25 tyre reviews averaging 33% over 392,000 miles driven.
Latest Group Test Results
2012 Autobild 50 Tyre Braking Test - 50th of 45 tyres
View All Tests >>
Sorry, we don't currently have any label data for the Rockstone Radial F105
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Rockstone Radial F105. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question
We will never publish or share your email address
Top 3 Rockstone Radial F105 Reviews
Given
34%
while driving a
BMW Alpina d3
(265/30 R19) on
mostly motorways
for 10,000
average miles
I wish I'd never bought these tyres! If you want a skid pan experience just buy a set. In the wet I'm going round every roundabout totally sideways at 10mph. At first I thought somebody must be coating my tyres in grease overnight for a laugh but it's been going on for too long now. I can only describe the wet handing as if driving a car on rims with no tyres at all! One time I actually stopped to check the tyres hadn't come off! They were still there, hard as ever and laughing in my face daring me to get back in the car!! As long as you don't mind writing off your car and yourself they do last forever. You can smoke them out on the spot all day and I guarantee the Tarmac will give up before the tyre they are that hardy. Hardy is great as long as you are hardy enough yourself to get out of your burning wreck of a car!! I've recently upgraded to sunew.
Given
36%
while driving a
Mitsubishi Colt
(175/65 R14) on
a combination of roads
for 0
average miles
Dry driving is ok, Wet driving is DANGEROUS. These tyres let go so suddenly in the wet at only 15mph turning into a side road ?!?!?! Please avoid if you value your life, there are much better alternatives.
Do your homework !
Given
60%
while driving a
Honda Civic Type R
(205/45 R17) on
mostly country roads
for 1,000
easy going miles
Dangerously bad from day one, mine are nowhere near worn out but I'm having to change them,as I quite like living.
Have you driven on the Rockstone Radial F105 tyre?
Have YOU got experience with the Rockstone Radial F105? Help millions of other tyre buyers
Review your Rockstone Radial F105 >
Latest Rockstone Radial F105 Reviews
Given
41%
while driving a
Toyota MK2 MR2 NA
(215/40 R17) on
mostly town
for 30,000
average miles
DO NOT BUY THESE TYRES. I don't take my car out in the wet because it. Wet roads wheels spins at 10km/hr in the straight, very embarrassing and more importantly DANGEROUS.In dry conditions slips in straight brakings from 60km/hr to stop in 40m with gradual braking. THESE ARE SAFETY HAZZARD TYRES. Toyota mr2 sw20 na. 50%tread left on tyres
Want the best tyre for real world driving? Watch this!
Given
36%
while driving a
Mitsubishi Colt
(175/65 R14) on
a combination of roads
for 0
average miles
Dry driving is ok, Wet driving is DANGEROUS. These tyres let go so suddenly in the wet at only 15mph turning into a side road ?!?!?! Please avoid if you value your life, there are much better alternatives.
Do your homework !
Given
53%
while driving a
Holden cruze
(225/40 R18 W) on
a combination of roads
for 20,000
easy going miles
I know what top tyres feel like and top tyres are a dream. I bought a brand new car that had rockstone tyres. I did not Google about rockstone before I drove so trusted what I had on my car. Naive I know. However I did not slow down. I drove hard and fast. Although I knew these tyres were not the best in wet I thought they were ok tyres. Long lasting. I overtook vehicles, drove new Zealand roads like I stole the car and felt fine. Maybe I'm a good driver. But after these reviews maybe I will change. 40000 km still 20000 to go maybe. No punctures.
Given
60%
while driving a
Ford Falcon BF
(225/45 R17) on
a combination of roads
for 40,000
easy going miles
As others have said. These tyres are MURDEROUS in the wet, I've had so many near misses with these. O the other hand I have not found them noisy or anything less than adequate in the dry, and I have had 70000 Ks out of them and only a bad alignment is causing me to replace them. I reckon that 100000 Ks might be possible with these tyres they show so little wear. But the main point to reiterate is they are TERRIBLE in the wet. If you can afford something better then you must buy it. CAR: Ford Falcon BA Mk1
Very poor tyre. Were fitted to the car when i got it guess they were cheap were aufull in almost every respect. noisy no grip and unpredictable. My advice is dont buy them.
Given
23%
while driving a
Holden commodore
(225/55 R16) on
mostly town
for 120,000
average miles
Recently bought a 2004 Holden utility fitted with these tyres. Everything was fine until it started to rain. Very little rear grip on cornering, this is like trying to drive a roller skate... very dangerous.
I am getting new Dunlops fitted tomorrow I'm fond of living.
Given
60%
while driving a
Honda Civic Type R
(205/45 R17) on
mostly country roads
for 1,000
easy going miles
Dangerously bad from day one, mine are nowhere near worn out but I'm having to change them,as I quite like living.
I have two of these on my car, along with a Rotella and a Sunew. It seems that the three of these combined is a potent combination. Potent as in the smell off my undies when I realize how dangerous it now was to drive at 140km/h in the rain on these!
I will be changing asap as I have also had the pleasure of ice skating around roundabouts and bends. I don't know how much mileage is on them nor do I ever want to know.
They are just horrendous.