Menu

Alfa Romeo MiTo Tyres

On this page you will find the best real world tyre reviews from owners of the Alfa Romeo MiTo.

Drive a Alfa Romeo MiTo? Why not add your own tyre review and help other owners pick the right tyre!

Review Your Tyres »
42 Tyre Reviews
77% Avg Rating
Tyre Reviewed Dry Grip Wet Grip Feedback Handling Wear Comfort
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 (409) 91% 89% 86% 85% 80% 87%
Toyo Proxes CF2 (108) 88% 82% 81% 83% 85% 86%
Vredestein Snowtrac 3 (34) 84% 91% 82% 76% 83% 86%
Falken Azenis FK520 (38) 89% 86% 82% 84% 78% 83%
Michelin Pilot Sport 3 PS3 (305) 90% 88% 84% 84% 73% 82%
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 (183) 88% 85% 81% 81% 79% 86%
Hankook Ventus Evo (9) 94% 94% 81% 89% 63% 85%
Kumho V70a (20) 99% 78% 89% 87% 56% 70%
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric (141) 90% 87% 82% 78% 70% 80%
Platin RP 420 (3) 90% 83% 83% 87% 73% 63%
Pirelli Sottozero Serie II (31) 84% 86% 88% 81% 81% 86%
Sava Intensa UHP 2 (52) 85% 78% 78% 77% 78% 81%
Kumho Ecsta KU39 (125) 86% 78% 80% 76% 73% 81%
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 (83) 87% 81% 78% 79% 73% 77%
Dunlop SportMaxx RT (180) 88% 84% 82% 81% 60% 82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71 (82) 86% 81% 80% 80% 72% 74%
Pirelli CINTURATO P1 (33) 81% 73% 77% 73% 80% 83%
Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme (64) 83% 86% 82% 77% 87% 86%
Bridgestone Potenza RE720 (20) 84% 77% 75% 77% 64% 70%
Nexen N Fera SU1 (145) 82% 75% 74% 75% 71% 79%
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 (194) 83% 77% 77% 72% 78% 71%
Sumitomo BC100 (17) 78% 75% 71% 69% 74% 74%
Continental Premium Contact 2 (200) 84% 77% 75% 73% 62% 73%
Davanti DX640 (100) 79% 71% 74% 72% 65% 77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005 (180) 80% 78% 72% 73% 66% 72%
Goodyear Excellence (127) 79% 70% 72% 71% 72% 73%
Dunlop SP Sport Maxx TT (55) 85% 73% 74% 76% 65% 65%
Pirelli PZero Nero (141) 83% 65% 71% 71% 67% 64%
Sunny SN3830 (18) 56% 45% 49% 44% 70% 67%
Accelera Alpha (131) 65% 44% 53% 48% 69% 56%
Alfa Romeo MiTo Tyre Review Highlights
Writing about the Bridgestone Turanza T005 given 57% (205-55-16)
Well, an end-of-life review for an NLA tire.
The T005 shines still to this day in one attribute, longevity.
Oh yeah, they do.

35.000km later and 7 years later, they still produce a safe combination. Although absolute grip is diminished, the way they provide the little grip left is safe and progressive. This is what I like and continue to like with T005, they have such a wide operating window, really in other vehicles without ABS they are the only tires that let you threshold brake without locking up, as they provide a wide plateau of grip and underotation. This progressive nature extends to all driving attributes, and even so many years down the line.

They were kings of comfort; even now, they still retain comfort, even though the sidewall has started collapsing and squishing down. Their prime is long gone, and they are a very, very deprecated model, especially in 16"+ offerings. having been superseded by many many better designs.

The next pair, which is rather soon going to be replaced, will be either the premium contact 7 or the primacy 5.
Based only on comfort and suspension component protection, and believe me, they have very big shoes to fill.

So for 16"+ DO NOT buy them, not cause they aren't good, but because there are better options out there, but for 15" or 14" (if you can find 14" T005) they are the only premium touring tire still available...
tyre reviewed on 2026-03-03 08:26:27
Writing about the Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 given 75% (215-45-17)
I 'm not disapointed with the good performe of those V12 evo2 tyres. I come from a set of Pirelli's Pzero Nero, mounted by Alfa Romeo when a new car, I'm trying those Hankook, and in dry conditions they are not far from Pirelli's. On wet conditions they are a little bit worse, also in handling corners... I'll miss my Pirelli's, but the excelent price/performance relation of the V12's made my choice for this tyre. The changes of grip with time it's under experimentation, naturally.
tyre reviewed on 2026-01-21 14:39:33
Writing about the Hankook Ventus Evo given 90% (215-40-18)
Driving on a combination of roads for 1250 spirited miles
This is a short update to my initial review (submitted on April 4, 2025). I only submitted a wet grip score this time. Had a few more commutes and a roundtrip to Germany of well over 1,000 kms. On the wet grip, drove on an absolutely flooded German Autobahn (windshield wipers struggled to keep up), and it was steady as you'd like. Lost grip for the first time taking a wet round-about at a irresponsibly high speed (no-one around to hurt but the car). Even then, I was impressed on how long it took to lose grip.

Overall, I have driven on these tyres over 2,000 kilometres by now. Very impressed with them. Maybe not the most sport-biased tyre available (steering feel, “soft” & silent), but very grippy in both dry & wet, and they inspire loads of confidence. Can recommend to anyone as an everyday ‘sportier’ tyre.
tyre reviewed on 2025-05-07 05:28:10
Writing about the Hankook Ventus Evo given 92% (215-40-18-)
Driving on mostly country roads for 250 spirited miles
My initial impressions of the Hankook Ventus EVO are very positive. At the time of writing, this tyre has just launched. Its launch coincided with the previous summer tyres (Dunlop Sport Maxx RT2) on my Alfa Romeo Mito QV warranting replacement due to some cracking on the sidewall (Dunlops were coming up on 6 years of age but still would’ve had tread for 1 or 2 summers more). The above, combined with getting a good deal on them, meant I chose to give these Hankooks a try.

The size is a bit of an unusual one, and therefore the price of this set, compared to a set of 225-section width A-brand tyres, is quite a bit higher. Of the A-tier brands that offer their latest tyre model in the 215-section width tyres (not all brands do…), Hankook was by far the best deal for me.

I’ve mounted the tyres after work and immediately went for a little evening (cooler temps around 10 °C) back-road blast. The amount of grip these tyres have impressed me right away. Compared to the Dunlops I’ve had on before, the Hankook’s compound feels softer and construction a touch more compliant. Therefore, the grip, both directionally and laterally, feels much more impressive. The tyre is quieter, and the ride is more comfortable. Braking feels very strong, as well as giving good feedback. If I may nit-pick, the steering response, I do experience as a touch slower. If one drives (close to) the speed limit, I’d doubt this would be of any bother at all.

Although I’ve tried many tyres in my life before, I do not have the data bank of Jonathan. I hope he gets to try them soon and share his experiences. Personally, I’d imagine that these tyres are amongst some of the best available. I know they’ve really impressed me personally.

Note: these are my initial impressions after just two days commuting and two back-road blasts (ca. 400 kms total). I will monitor the wear, performance in different conditions and update my review where possible.
tyre reviewed on 2025-04-04 08:13:05
Writing about the Platin RP 420 given 87% (195-55-16-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 15000 average miles
Really good value for this price category. Good handling in wet and also in dry roads. Maybe a bit more noisy..
tyre reviewed on 2024-11-05 16:51:51
Writing about the Pirelli CINTURATO P1 given 84% (195-55-16-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 25000 miles
About to fit my second set. Dry grip, comfort, handling and long tyre life are particular strengths. Wet grip is good enough, especially on one occasion a while back when an elderly motorist pulled out of a local garden centre without looking, and I to drop the anchors fast! Thoroughly recommend.
tyre reviewed on 2024-01-28 15:54:53
Writing about the Falken Azenis FK520 given 79% (215-45-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 500 average miles
No comments left
tyre reviewed on 2023-02-25 13:14:18
Writing about the Kumho Ecsta PS71 given 90% (215-40-18-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 200 spirited miles
Only traveled 200 kilometers so far but at this stage they are a fantastic tyre, replace all 4 for Kuhmo ps71, very quite , nice ride definitely improved over worn conti 5 on the front and Bridgestone on the rear, grip is great in the hot weather so far weve had, will update in a few months with some more ks on them
tyre reviewed on 2023-02-06 18:28:18
Writing about the Falken Azenis FK520 given 87% (215-45-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 2000 average miles
No comments left
tyre reviewed on 2023-01-10 08:50:07
Writing about the Sumitomo BC100 given 83% (195-55-16-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 200 spirited miles
Not had these for long but so far they're great for budget priced tyres. Didn't want to spend a fortune as I'm replacing my alloys soon. For the mileage I do they do the job.
tyre reviewed on 2022-12-01 14:26:15
Writing about the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 given 74% (225-45-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 25000 spirited miles
We bought these tyres for our Alfa Romeo MiTo QV in 2017, it lasted 40.000 kms, and I think it's not bad for an 170 hp FWD car, however we had to rotate between front amd rear. Grip was good, but not too special. Only sometimes did the tyres have an extra grip. But there wasn't any serious problems with handling, the car handled very stable every time. Tyres were a bit hard to our crapp Hungarian roads, on bad surfaces it shaked the car. I'm looking for buy the new tyres form another brand, that's why I'm here.
tyre reviewed on 2021-05-13 15:01:57
Writing about the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 given 83% (215-45-17-W)
Driving on mostly town for 25000 average miles
Much improved and better than Asymmetric II, that I didn't liked, mainly because they had very soft sides. Very good overall, medium wear, very good grip, a little bit noisy. After more than 3 years, they are still
tyre reviewed on 2020-04-25 10:19:50
Drive this car? Why not add your own tyre review and help other owners pick the right tyre