Menu
Aptany RA301 View Gallery (1)
165-315/30-55 R16-24 89 sizes 2016

Aptany RA301

The Aptany RA301 is a High Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.2
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
73%
Wet Grip
62%
Road Feedback
65%
Handling
65%
Wear
48%
Comfort
67%
Buy again
50%
21 Reviews
61% Average
158,285 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 13th)
Aptany RA301

Aptany RA301

Summer Budget
BETA
6.2 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2016
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 21
Avg Rating: 61.1%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.05
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2016 Test World Performance Tyre Test Test World 2016 225/40 R18 13/13 0 metrics
1
Tests
13th
Average
13th
Best
13th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
13th/13
Low noise level, low rolling resistance
Long braking distances and poor handling on dry and wet roads
Size Fuel Wet Noise
16 inch
205/55R16 91 V C B 70
20 inch
275/55R20 117 H XL C B 72
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Aptany RA301 >>

Questions and Answers for the Aptany RA301

Ask a question
April 4, 2018

APTANY MACRO 275/40/20 IS THE TIRE DIRECTIONAL? WHY DOES IT SAY OUTSIDE AND INSIDE ON THE TIRE, PLEASE ADVISE

If it says outside and inside then it is an asymmetric tyre. The tyre pattern would also confirm this.
November 15, 2018

what should the tread depth be on a new aptany 205/55R/16 91H RW211 winter tire

I don't know the exact figure, but it should be somewhere between 7 and 9mm
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 19 user reviews

Drivers' experiences with the Aptany RA301 are mixed, leaning negative overall. Many low- and mid-scoring reviews cite very fast wear and poor wet grip and confidence, while several high-scoring users praise wet traction, low noise, and value for money. Grip, noise, and comfort receive conflicting feedback depending on vehicle and driving style, but durability is a consistent weak point. It can work as a budget option for light, conservative use, but many report short tread life and slippery wet performance.

Strengths
  • Good wet grip for the price (some users)
  • Low road noise (some users)
  • Value/budget pricing
Areas for Improvement
  • Very fast tread wear
  • Poor wet grip and long braking (many users)
  • Premature vibration/pressure issues
  • Low confidence/unsafe feel in corners

Top 3 Aptany RA301 Reviews

Given 50% while driving a Volvo D4 Inscription (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 17,000 spirited miles
I've had these 19 months on the front, 187 bhp Volvo D4. Both are virtually bald. I do about 10k a year, so that's about 17k I've done in them. I've never known tyres wear so fast. On the rear I have a pair of Michelin summer tyres that still look like new with deep treads, despite being 36 months old. I don't do that many wheelspins and emergency stops. Turning off roundabouts and putting my footdown usually feels quite unsafe with side slides. Never again trusting this brand, not worth the hassle, despite being so cheap.
February 23, 2025
Given 26% while driving a Skoda Octavia vRS (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 600 spirited miles
Dealership slapped these bargain basement boots on my Octavia just before I bought it so it would get through an MOT. My initial thought was I'd keep them on until I wore them out but turns out I'll probably meet my end before that so I'll likely swap them out for set of Eagle F1s or similar to deny the reaper for a little longer. They were... Passable in the dry, car felt like it handled poorly but not in an unsafe way. The wet was a different story, the braking distance was suddenly measured in light-years and the car struggled to both find and keep traction while cornering and in in-gear acceleration (from some moderate but not excessive driving). It felt like my tyres had been replaced by some devious little gremlins with 4 circular blocks of ice.
In reality, these tyres are probably fine if fitted to a small city car or underpowered hatchback with a driver who is allergic to lateral acceleration. However, I'd make sure you are a beneficiary on their life insurance policy just in the event of a wet emergency stop or alternatively they live in the middle of the Sahara desert or the centre of death valley.
November 10, 2024
Given 30% while driving a Ford Focus (225/50 R17) on mostly motorways for 5,000 average miles
Had one fitted on my front left & it’s terrible. Hardly any grip when making sharp turns in the wet the car actually moves across instead of turning. Only reason I got it was because I had puncture with my davanti and the 247 call out company only had these ones to replace mine.
August 28, 2024

How would you rate the Aptany RA301?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Aptany RA301 Reviews

Given 21% while driving a Nissan Juke (215/55 R17) on mostly country roads for 20,000 average miles
Do not buy these tyres.
Absolute rubbish, only lasted 20000km
And never felt so scared driving in the wet, absolutely no grip and no stirring feeling. Spend a bit more for your safety .
July 29, 2023
Given 64% while driving a Porsche Cayenne Turbo (275/45 R20) on mostly town for 4,000 easy going miles
With only 7k km the front driver tire is kind of vibrating, could notice last time went to balance the Wheels. Im gonna try the 5 year warranty but Lost a Lot of confidence on them. Maybe because my car is Very heavy on the front: v8 4.5 twin turbo
January 18, 2022
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
BMW (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 8,000 average miles
Had them on the front of my 5 series BMW for two years. Cant understand the guy who says he has got under 2000 miles from them! Must be driving like a lunatic. Mine have been excellent, even in snow! Rear wheel drive of course, but the beemer isn't a lightweight. Good cornering grip, good in the rain and quiet. Have to change unfortunately, due to a screw in the tread, near a sidewall, otherwise I think they are good for thousands of miles yet. More than 4.5mm of tread left. Can't find any locally so will try another brand. Pity.
February 19, 2021
Given 39% while driving a Saab Automobile 9 5 2.2 TID Vector Estate (225/45 R17 W) on mostly country roads for 1,579 average miles
Had these tyres fitted at the end of September prior to an MOT. As is typical these days, money was tight so went down the budget tyre route. Well, today, mid December, I've moved them from the front to the back, to try and squeeze a few more miles out of them, and they are done. After 1,579 miles, they're on the wear markers. Dry and wet grip was adequate, but the wear rate is definitely not. Budget tyres... ...they're only cheap on the day. I will not be buying them again, nor any of their cheap Chinese brethren.
December 12, 2020
Given 79% while driving a Honda Accord Tourer (235/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 20,000 average miles
Just purchased my second set of the aptany RA301 235/45/17 97W for a Honda Accord Estate.I have these still fitted on a 2013 mondeo.For the price point these are excellent tyres.Dry grip is fine but its in the wet where these excell...they are incredable.Never once lost grip with these including wet...the way they cut through water even at motorway speeds is remarkable.The construction is good and i feel totally connected to the road at all times. There is one draw back though and thats tyre wear! Im no test pilot and they have covered 20k now with maybe 4/5k until they done.They are summer tyres so compound is soft.A few other things to factor in though...a premium brand tyre may get double the mileage if your lucky but they will cost at least 2-3X.Also after a few thousand miles your likely to have picked up a puncture or few...after 4 years and 25k miles i would want a fresh set of boots no matter what brand i had bought. Fuel rating C and most important for me rated B in the wet means you have a very safe tyre when you need it most.Pretty quiet on the open road as well. To sum up there cant be a better tyre out there than this for the money..£240 fitted with valves and balancing.My honda currently has equivalent ZV7 by avon....not a bad tyre by any means but they are no where close to the aptany in the wet and why im changing. Highly recommend and wont break the bank giving these a try.
August 28, 2020
Given 86% while driving a Kia Motors Forte (215/45 R17) on mostly town for 3,106 easy going miles
I'll be honest about buying these. The car they went on is a 2011 Kia Forte SX, that is driven mostly by my wife, to and from work on weekdays. I drive it on weekends when we run around town for groceries and such. given that it's on a 9 year old daily driven car, that is driven pretty conservatively, I didn't want to spend a lot on tires. I'm not willing to spend a boat load of money on a car that may expire in the near future. The last set of budget tires, with similar tread wear rating of ~300 lasted 2 summers. So if we get the same out of these, I'll be happy. Some would argue that spending more money on tires that would last, say 4 summers, would be a better choice. But, I like a value, and many times, budget doesn't allow spending that much on rubber at any given time. These were purchased in late March 2020, and mounted in mid April. Oil change was just done on July 7 2020, as well as a tire rotation. Wear has been even, and assuming that depth at new was 8mm, after 5000kms, they are down to just under 7mm. So, not bad at all for a 340 treadwear tire. When they were first mounted, both y wife and I noticed they were a bit noisier than the ones they replaced. On par with our winters. I also noticed they were a bit twitchy, as if the car needed an alignment. They track well now, and are very quiet on new pavement. It hasn't rained in a while, so I can't quite comment on how they perform in the rain. That being said, I adjust my driving for the conditions, so I'm sure they'll be ok. Would I buy them again? If it's for the Kia, then yes. But, I've got my eyes on Rotalla next time.
July 8, 2020
Given 44% while driving a Ford Focus MK3 (235/35 R18) on for 8,000 miles
These are the fastest wearing tyres I have ever bought. My last set lasted 30,000 miles, these are shot ofter 8,000
July 4, 2020
Given 37% while driving a Volkswagen Caddy (225/40 R18) on mostly country roads for 2,500 easy going miles
The worst tyres I’ve come across put them on in February an the fronts are gone already
May 16, 2020
Given 60% while driving a Ford Focus mk2 (205/50 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 8,500 average miles
Cheap tyres do the job for a year about 9000milies
On a mk2 ford focus 2.0i
Work well just bad wear rate
Will not buy again.
Ok on the back of car.

December 6, 2019
Given 21% while driving a Volkswagen Golf 7 GTD (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 7,000 spirited miles
Absolutely rubbish tyre bought my used car and the seller put 4 of these tyres on I assume he had the cheapest tyre they did which was these. Very noisey tyre very poor grip in rain just masses of understeer. Fronts haven't lasted 7000 miles and they are now 2mm. Would steer clear of these tyres. Dont understand people who buy cheap tyres not worth it when a 10k car is in a ditch because you saved 100 quid on tyres.
October 4, 2019
Given 91% while driving a Porsche Cayenne Turbo (275/45 R20 V) on mostly town for 1,000 easy going miles
Good for the money, quiet and look nice
June 29, 2019
Given 77% while driving a Chevrolet Equinox (235/55 R18 W) on mostly motorways for 5,000 spirited miles
I have them on a 2011 Equinox and only for a year so limited info. Like the low road noise and the performance on the highway. The SUV AWD has never been a good mileage vehicle and there is no change with these tires
June 23, 2019
Rate the Aptany RA301