245/35 R18 Tyres

A very, very good tyre.

Previously, I had the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, and I can say that the Asymmetric 6 are considerably better than the evo3 in practically every aspect, grip in both dry and wet conditions and, most importantly, consistency of performance throughout the tyre's lifespan.
Straight-line aquaplaning is practically non-existent, even when the tyres are close to the TWI, which is much, much better than the evo3. With the evo3, once they were below half tread depth and in wet conditions, I considered their behaviour to be dangerous.
The Asymmetric 6 were only €15 more expensive per tyre than the evo3, and in my opinion, they are well worth the extra cost. I have much more confidence when driving in a sporty manner, both in dry and wet conditions. The tyre's behaviour is very linear and progressive, with no surprises.

One point I consider negative is the wear. The left rear tyre developed a rather strange wear pattern, it wore significantly more between the centre of the tyre and the outer shoulder, despite using the same tyre pressure on both sides and having the alignment checked and correct. I had never seen anything like this before. It may have been an issue with this particular tyre, but fortunately, it did not affect its performance. In this respect, the Hankooks are better, they lasted around 7,000 km more than the Asymmetric 6, and the wear was also more even across the entire tread.
The Asymmetric 6 are slightly more comfortable than the evo3 and also slightly quieter. They also have more rim protection, which is always welcome.

I highly recommend this tyre. Also use the Asymmetric 6 on the front axle in size 225/40 R18.

This tyre lasted 39,566 km / 24,585 mi, which is less than the Hankooks, but I am perfectly happy to make that trade-off for the extra grip and safety.

A tyre that does what it is supposed to do, considering the price.

Previously, I had Continental ContiSportContact 5 RunFlat and replaced them with the standard version of the Hankook (non-RunFlat). In terms of comfort, compared to the Contis, the evo3s are significantly better, mainly because they are not RunFlat, and the overall behaviour of the tyre is also better for that reason.
The tyre performs well on both dry and wet roads when it is new. However, its performance decreases significantly as it wears. Once it is around halfway worn, the levels of grip drop considerably, both in dry and wet conditions.
I do a lot of motorway driving and, on rainy days, straight-line aquaplaning becomes quite noticeable once the tyre is more than halfway worn. This does not happen when the tyre is new. The traction control also activates quite often, which does not make for a very pleasant experience.
In terms of noise, they are slightly quieter than the Conti´s. The tyre wears evenly. It could have a little more rim protection, as there is practically none.

This tyre lasted 46,127 km / 28,661 mi, which I consider to be quite good, having only been used on the rear axle.

Very noisy
Wet grip very poor with limited feel prior to losing grip